Literature DB >> 15973100

Restoration of normal distensive characteristics of the esophagogastric junction after fundoplication.

John E Pandolfino1, Jennifer Curry, Guoxiang Shi, Raymond J Joehl, James G Brasseur, Peter J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the mechanical characteristics of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) of postfundoplication patients and compare them with previously reported data on normal subjects and GERD patients.
METHODS: Eight normal subjects, 9 GERD patients, and 8 fundoplication patients were studied with concurrent manometry, fluoroscopy, and stepwise controlled barostat distention of the EGJ. The minimal barostat pressure required to open the EGJ during the interswallow period was determined. Thereafter, barium swallows were imaged in 5-mm Hg increments of intrabag pressure. EGJ diameter and length were measured at each pressure during deglutitive relaxation.
RESULTS: EGJ opening diameter during deglutitive relaxation was on average 0.5 cm greater in GERD patients compared with normal subjects and fundoplication patients (P < 0.05). EGJ opening pressure and opening diameter were comparable between normal subjects and fundoplication patients; however, the EGJ length was 32% longer in fundoplication patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Fundoplication restores distensibility of the EGJ to a level similar to normal subjects. Since trans-EGJ flow is related to EGJ length and EGJ diameter, these findings suggest that retrograde flow through the EGJ would be decreased by both a reduction in diameter and an increase in length of the EGJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15973100      PMCID: PMC1357703          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167868.44211.f0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  7 in total

1.  Esophagogastric junction pressure topography after fundoplication.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; S Lin; M Manka; G Shi; R J Joehl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Effect of laparoscopic partial fundoplication on reflux mechanisms.

Authors:  Maud A Lindeboom; Jan Ringers; Jan-Wilten A Straathof; Pieter J J van Rijn; Peter Neijenhuis; Ad A M Masclee
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Asymmetry of lower esophageal sphincter pressure: is it related to the muscle thickness or its shape?

Authors:  J Liu; V K Parashar; R K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-06

4.  Standardization of barostat procedures for testing smooth muscle tone and sensory thresholds in the gastrointestinal tract. The Working Team of Glaxo-Wellcome Research, UK.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; M Delvaux
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Pathophysiological measurement and results after laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Kaja Ludwig; Joern Bernhardt; Gerlind Amtsberg; Maczej Patrzyk; Lutz Wilhelm; Andreas Hoene
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J G Hunter; T L Trus; G D Branum; J P Waring; W C Wood
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The effect of total and anterior partial fundoplication on antireflux mechanisms of the gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Emmanuel Chrysos; Elias Athanasakis; George Pechlivanides; Anastasios Tzortzinis; Apostolos Mantides; Evaghelos Xynos
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.565

  7 in total
  24 in total

1.  Geometry and biomechanics of the esophagogastric junction: implications for antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Johannes Lenglinger; Margit Eisler; Martin Riegler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Functional oesophago-gastric junction imaging.

Authors:  Barry P McMahon; Asbjørn M Drewes; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Lessons learned from surgical management of achalasia: does "cardia" result from pouch-like transformation of distal esophagus?

Authors:  Johannes Lenglinger; Margit Eisler; Martin Riegler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Biomechanics of the esophagogastric junction in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-06

5.  Effects of mosapride on esophageal motor activity and esophagogastric junction compliance in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kousuke Fukazawa; Kenji Furuta; Kyoichi Adachi; Yoshiya Moritou; Tsukasa Saito; Ryusaku Kusunoki; Goichi Uno; Shino Shimura; Masahito Aimi; Shunji Ohara; Shunji Ishihara; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 6.  Esophageal motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Irene Martinucci; Nicola de Bortoli; Maria Giacchino; Giorgia Bodini; Elisa Marabotto; Santino Marchi; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-05-06

7.  Is that 'floppy' fundoplication tight enough?

Authors:  Brexton Turner; Melissa Helm; Emily Hetzel; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP).

Authors:  Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Ikuo Hirano; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Identification of risk factors for postoperative dysphagia after primary anti-reflux surgery.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Tommy H Lee; András Legner; Fumiaki Yano; Thomas Dworak; Sumeet K Mittal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Esophagogastric junction distensibility is greater following Toupet compared to Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Reece K DeHaan; Daniel Davila; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.