Literature DB >> 30006845

Minimal versus obligatory dissection of the diaphragmatic hiatus during magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery.

James M Tatum1, Evan Alicuben1, Nikolai Bildzukewicz1, Kamran Samakar1, Caitlin C Houghton1, John C Lipham2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device was initially implanted with minimal hiatal dissection (MHD) at the diaphragmatic hiatus. Due to concern of possible MSA device dysfunction if herniated into an occult or small hiatal hernia, and increased understanding to the role of defective crura in reflux disease, the operative procedure was changed to planned obligatory dissection (OD) of the hiatus at the time of all implantations.
METHODS: Between December 2012 and September 2016, 182 patients underwent MSA implant at a single medical center and have complete records available for review through September 2017. The MHD dissection period extended from December 2012 to September 2015, from September 2015 to 2016 all patients underwent OD.
RESULTS: MHD occurred 53% (96/182) versus OD in 47% (86/182), mean follow-up time in days for MHD and OD was 554 (SD 427) versus 374 (298) days. Intraoperative measurement of hernia size for the MHD versus OD was 0.77 (1.1) versus 3.95 (2.4) cm, p < 0.001. At first visit follow-up, there was no difference in any dysphagia (p = 0.11). Recurrent GERD (defined as resumption of PPI after successful initial post-operative wean) was less frequent after OD than after MHD, 3.6 versus 16.3%, p = 0.006. Delayed onset dysphagia was 1.2% in the OD group versus 8.6% in the MHD group, p = 0.04. Recurrent hiatal hernia of 2 cm or greater occurred in 0.0% of the OD and 11.5% of the MHD, p = 0.03. Repeat surgery for hiatal hernia repair has occurred in 0% of the OD and 6.6% of the MHD, p = 0.02.
CONCLUSION: OD of the hiatus with crural closure resulted in less recurrence of reflux symptoms and hiatal hernia, despite an increased proportion of patients with larger hiatal hernia and more complex anatomic disease at the time of operation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GERD; Hiatal hernia; LINX; MSA; Magnetic sphincter augmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30006845     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6343-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years.

Authors:  John C Lipham; Tom R DeMeester; Robert A Ganz; Luigi Bonavina; Greta Saino; Daniel H Dunn; Paul Fockens; Willem Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Anatomical and functional deficiencies of the crural diaphragm in patients with esophagitis.

Authors:  M Â N E Souza; R A Nobre; P C Bezerra; A A Dos Santos; D Sifrim
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  The phrenic ampulla: distal esophagus or potential hiatal hernia?

Authors:  S Lin; J G Brasseur; P Pouderoux; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-02

4.  Efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with large hiatal hernias.

Authors:  Kais A Rona; Jessica Reynolds; Katrin Schwameis; Joerg Zehetner; Kamran Samakar; Paul Oh; David Vong; Kulmeet Sandhu; Namir Katkhouda; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; John C Lipham
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Role of the lower esophageal sphincter and hiatal hernia in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M Fein; M P Ritter; T R DeMeester; S Oberg; J H Peters; J A Hagen; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas; Thomas J Lee
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.750

7.  Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Robert A Ganz; Jeffrey H Peters; Santiago Horgan; Willem A Bemelman; Christy M Dunst; Steven A Edmundowicz; John C Lipham; James D Luketich; W Scott Melvin; Brant K Oelschlager; Steven C Schlack-Haerer; C Daniel Smith; Christopher C Smith; Dan Dunn; Paul A Taiganides
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Short-term outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for medically resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Brian E Louie; Alexander S Farivar; Dale Shultz; Christina Brennan; Eric Vallières; Ralph W Aye
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Length and pressure of the reconstructed lower esophageal sphincter is determined by both crural closure and Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Brian E Louie; Seema Kapur; Maurice Blitz; Alexander S Farivar; Eric Vallières; Ralph W Aye
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation.

Authors:  F P Buckley; Reginald C W Bell; Kate Freeman; Stephanie Doggett; Rachel Heidrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  Does Treatment of the Hiatus Influence the Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Chronic GERD?

Authors:  Matías Mihura Irribarra; Sandra Blitz; Candice L Wilshire; Anee Sophia Jackson; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Christy M Dunst; Brian E Louie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Effect of Increased Intra-abdominal Pressure on the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stefano Siboni; Luigi Bonavina; Benjamin D Rogers; Ciara Egan; Edoardo Savarino; C Prakash Gyawali; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.174

3.  Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  E N Kirkham; B G Main; K J B Jones; J M Blazeby; N S Blencowe
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Six to 12-year outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Davide Ferrari; Emanuele Asti; Veronica Lazzari; Stefano Siboni; Daniele Bernardi; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.