Literature DB >> 15126066

The role of salience in localized attentional interference.

Jeffrey R W Mounts1, Brandon E Gavett.   

Abstract

Observers were cued to attend to two discs from an array and made a discrimination of a target presented within one of the discs. In Experiments 1 and 2, the relative attentional salience of the two attended items was manipulated via the cues (size changes in Experiment 1; size and color changes in Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, the relative salience was manipulated via the luminance contrast of the items themselves. In Experiment 4, relative attentional salience was controlled through a probability manipulation. In all experiments, target performance improved with the relative salience of the target, as well as with increased spatial separation between the two items. This localized interference between cued items varied with visual field. Results are discussed in the context of competition-based models of attentional selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126066     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection.

Authors:  Thomas A Carlson; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Localized attentional interference reflects competition for reentrant processing.

Authors:  Kelly S Steelman-Allen; Jason S McCarley; Jeffrey R W Mounts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

3.  Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Jianguo Lü; Hermann J Müller; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: implications for the perceptual load theory.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Guanlan Kang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  When emotion blinds: a spatiotemporal competition account of emotion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Lingling Wang; Briana L Kennedy; Steven B Most
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-07

7.  Interhemispheric integration in visual search.

Authors:  Stewart Shipp
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Context and competition in the capture of visual attention.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Ana Torralbo; Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-10

10.  Evidence inhibition responds reactively to the salience of distracting information during focused attention.

Authors:  Natalie Wyatt; Liana Machado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.