Literature DB >> 23184671

Contact patch to rim distance predicts metal ion levels in hip resurfacing.

James P Yoon1, Michel J Le Duff, Alicia J Johnson, Karren M Takamura, Edward Ebramzadeh, Harlan C Amstutz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Component design, size, acetabular orientation, patient gender, and activity level have been suggested as factors leading to elevated metal ion concentrations after-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MMHRA). The calculation of the contact patch to rim (CPR) distance integrates component size, design, and acetabular orientation and may be a good predictor of elevated metal ion levels. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We evaluated the effects and the predictive value of the CPR distance on serum cobalt (CoS) and chromium (CrS) ion levels.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 182 patients with Conserve Plus MMHRAs at a minimum of 12 months after surgery (median, 57 months; range, 12-165 months). CoS and CrS levels were analyzed using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine which if any of the factors related to serum ion levels.
RESULTS: Patients with CPR distances of 10 mm or less had a 37-fold increased risk of having elevated CoS of 7 μg/L or higher. Similarly, these patients had an 11-fold increased risk of having elevated CrS of 7 μg/L or higher. Sex and University of California Los Angeles activity scores did not influence the postoperative CoS and CrS levels. The negative predictive value for CPR distance less than 10 mm was 99.3% for CoS greater than 7 μg/L and 98.0% for CrS greater than 7 μg/L.
CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest the CPR distance would be a useful indicator to determine which patients are at risk for elevated ion levels. Patients with CPR distances greater than 10 mm need not be monitored unless they become symptomatic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184671      PMCID: PMC3613526          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2711-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  41 in total

1.  Arthroprosthetic cobaltism: neurological and cardiac manifestations in two patients with metal-on-metal arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Stephen S Tower
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  "Asymptomatic" pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Simon J Ostlere; Peter McLardy-Smith; Nicholas A Athanasou; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  How do serum cobalt and chromium levels change after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Diane L Back; D A Young; A J Shimmin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components.

Authors:  R De Haan; P A Campbell; E P Su; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-09

5.  Metal-on-metal bearing in hip prosthesis generates 100-fold less wear debris than metal-on-polyethylene.

Authors:  H L Anissian; A Stark; A Gustafson; V Good; I C Clarke
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-12

6.  The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips.

Authors:  C B Hing; D L Back; M Bailey; D A Young; R E Dalziel; A J Shimmin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-11

7.  Characterization of the running-in period in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an in vivo and in vitro metal ion analysis.

Authors:  Christian Heisel; Nikolaus Streich; Michael Krachler; Eike Jakubowitz; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

9.  Does ion release differ between hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Antonio Moroni; Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Edge loading in metal-on-metal hips: low clearance is a new risk factor.

Authors:  Richard J Underwood; Angelos Zografos; Ritchie S Sayles; Alister Hart; Philippa Cann
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.617

View more
  6 in total

1.  Letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Harlan Amstutz; Michel Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Acetabular component thickness does not affect mid-term clinical results in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Mariam Al-Hamad; Michel J Le Duff; Karren M Takamura; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Implant-specific outcomes and risk factors for failure.

Authors:  Chan-Woo Park; Seung-Jae Lim; Joo-Hwan Kim; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Does femoral neck to cup impingement affect metal ion levels in hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Michel J Le Duff; Alicia J Johnson; Andrew J Wassef; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

6.  Comparing 1-year and 10-year whole blood metal ion results following Birmingham hip resurfacing for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Scott J Watt Kearns; Jonathan Bourget-Murray; Kelly Johnston; Jason Werle
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.840

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.