Literature DB >> 26830851

Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Robert Sershon1, Rishi Balkissoon2, Craig J Della Valle3.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is an alternative to conventional, stemmed total hip arthroplasty (THA). The best reported results are young, active patients with good bone stock and a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Since the 1990s, metal-on-metal (MoM) HRA has achieved excellent outcomes when used in the appropriate patient population. Concerns regarding the metal-on-metal bearing surface including adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) to metal debris have recently lead to a decline in the use of this construct. The current paper aims to provide an updated review on HRA, including a critical review of the most recent literature on HRA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Metal-on-metal arthroplasty

Year:  2016        PMID: 26830851      PMCID: PMC4762803          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9324-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  80 in total

1.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part I: the role of materials.

Authors:  Duncan Dowson; Cath Hardaker; Magnus Flett; Graham H Isaac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Femoral neck fracture after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: prevalence, time to fracture, and outcome after revision.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Callum W McBryde; Matthew P Revell; Paul B Pynsent
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Phillip S Ragland; Gracia Etienne; Thorsten M Seyler; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  The 2012 Otto Aufranc Award: The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Catherine Van Der Straeten; George Grammatopoulos; Harinderjit S Gill; Alessandro Calistri; Patricia Campbell; Koen A De Smet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.

Authors:  J Daniel; C Pradhan; H Ziaee; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Does the extent of osteonecrosis affect the survival of hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Satoshi Nakasone; Masaki Takao; Takashi Sakai; Takashi Nishii; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with total hip arthroplasty: two to five year outcomes in men younger than sixty five years.

Authors:  Leslie A Fink Barnes; Skylar H Johnson; David A Patrick; William Macaulay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Predicting wear and blood metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Ashley K Matthies; Johann Henckel; Suzie Cro; Alexander Suarez; Philip C Noble; John Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Implant-specific outcomes and risk factors for failure.

Authors:  Chan-Woo Park; Seung-Jae Lim; Joo-Hwan Kim; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.

Authors:  Ran Tao; Fan Liu; Ya-Ke Liu; Yue Lu; Hua Xu; Yi Cao; Zhen-Yu Zhou; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Activity levels following hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A tool to help manage patient expectations.

Authors:  Jack W Martin; Mark A Williams; Karen L Barker
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

4.  Biomimetic Multispiked Connecting Ti-Alloy Scaffold Prototype for Entirely-Cementless Resurfacing Arthroplasty Endoprostheses-Exemplary Results of Implantation of the Ca-P Surface-Modified Scaffold Prototypes in Animal Model and Osteoblast Culture Evaluation.

Authors:  Ryszard Uklejewski; Piotr Rogala; Mariusz Winiecki; Renata Tokłowicz; Piotr Ruszkowski; Maria Wołuń-Cholewa
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Computer-assisted Navigation in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Case Study utilizing the ReCap Femoral Resurfacing System.

Authors:  Ameer Elbuluk; Karlina Fiaes; Jessica R Benson; Edwin Su
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2019

6.  Living with a recalled implant: a qualitative study of patients' experiences with ASR hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Bitar; Ferid Krupic; Li Felländer-Tsai; Sead Crnalic; Per Wretenberg
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  The Effect of Travel Distance on Outcomes for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a High-Volume Center.

Authors:  Tony S Shen; Patawut Bovonratwet; Rachelle Morgenstern; Aaron Z Chen; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-24

8.  Gait after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: an age-matched controlled prospective study.

Authors:  Anatole V Wiik; Rhiannon Lambkin; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.082

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.