Literature DB >> 17998177

The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips.

C B Hing1, D L Back, M Bailey, D A Young, R E Dalziel, A J Shimmin.   

Abstract

We report an independent prospective review of the first 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings in 212 patients at a mean follow-up of five years (4 to 6). Two patients, one with a loose acetabular component and the other with suspected avascular necrosis of the femoral head, underwent revision. There were two deaths from unrelated causes and one patient was lost to follow-up. The survivorship with the worst-case scenario was 97.8% (95% confidence interval 95.8 to 99.5). The mean Harris hip score improved significantly (paired t-test, p < 0.05) from 62.54 (8 to 92) pre-operatively to 97.7 (61 to 100) at a mean of three years (2.1 to 4.3), then deteriorated slightly to a mean of 95.2 (47 to 100) at a mean of five years. The mean flexion improved from 91.5 degrees (25 degrees to 140 degrees) to 110.4 degrees (80 degrees to 145 degrees) at a mean of three years with no further improvement at five years (111.2 degrees; 70 degrees to 160 degrees). On radiological review at five years, one patient had a progressive lucent line around the acetabular component and six had progressive lucent lines around the femoral component. A total of 18 femoral components (8%) had migrated into varus and those with lucent lines present migrated a mean of 3.8 degrees (1.02 degrees to 6.54 degrees) more than the rest. Superolateral notching of the femoral neck and reactive sclerosis at the tip of the peg of the femoral component were associated with the presence of lucent lines (chi-squared test, p < 0.05), but not with migration of the femoral component, and are of unknown significance. Our results with the Birmingham hip resurfacing continue to be satisfactory at a mean follow-up of five years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17998177     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  52 in total

1.  High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Ronny Pilz; Urs Munzinger; Otmar Hersche; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

3.  Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu; Lee Webb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Does a plastic drape reduce incidence of heterotopic ossification after hip resurfacing?

Authors:  John S Shields; Ali Mofidi; William G Ward; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Indications and results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital.

Authors:  B Ollivere; S Duckett; A August; M Porteous
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Role of the extraosseus blood supply in osteoarthritic femoral heads?

Authors:  Ralf Schoeniger; Norman Espinosa; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The gluteal sling: an anatomical study.

Authors:  C Isik; N Apaydin; H I Acar; A Zahar; M Bozkurt
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Does hip resurfacing require larger acetabular cups than conventional THA?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Michael S H Kain; Otmar Hersche; Urs Munzinger; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.