Literature DB >> 24488236

The surgical epicondylar axis is a consistent reference of the distal femur in the coronal and axial planes.

Hideo Kobayashi1, Yasushi Akamatsu, Ken Kumagai, Yoshihiro Kusayama, Ryo Ishigatsubo, Shuntaro Muramatsu, Tomoyuki Saito.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Various rotational landmarks including the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) are used for preoperative planning and intra-operative reference of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the axial plane. The aim of the study was to elucidate the relationships between the SEA and other femoral anatomical landmarks, including the mechanical axis, distal and posterior knee joints, the trochlear groove, and the anterior femoral condyle, in both the coronal and axial planes.
METHODS: Angular and linear measurements were taken of sixty femora using Orthomap3D, which has a tool to analyse computed tomography image data that makes it possible to measure three-dimensional distances and angles precisely. The inter- and intra-observer reliabilities of these measurements were evaluated. Comparisons were made according to height, weight, body mass index, and gender.
RESULTS: The angle between the mechanical axis and the SEA was 90.2° (95% CI 90.0°-90.4°). There was a significant correlation for each linear measurement between the SEA and the distal/posterior knee joint line and for each linear measurement between the SEA and the anterior medial/lateral femoral condyle. A significant difference was observed between genders in the linear measurements. Significant correlations were found between height and weight and linear parameters.
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the relationships between the SEA and other femoral anatomical landmarks is useful in preoperative planning, intra-operative landmark, and postoperative assessment of TKA. The SEA is a consistent parameter of femoral alignment in the coronal plane and a stable reference for femoral rotation in the axial plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24488236     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2867-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Cyril Boeri
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02

3.  Relationship between the tibial anteroposterior axis and the surgical epicondylar axis in varus and valgus knees.

Authors:  Shinya Kawahara; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Hiroaki Mitsuyasu; Hiroyuki Nakahara; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Michael P Nett; W Norman Scott; Henry D Clarke; Keith R Berend; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review.

Authors:  J Victor
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  The gap technique does not rotate the femur parallel to the epicondylar axis.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Hinrich Boenicke; Sascha Pfiel; Georgi Wassilew; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  N Yoshino; S Takai; Y Ohtsuki; Y Hirasawa
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The anatomy and functional axes of the femur.

Authors:  Y Yoshioka; D Siu; T D Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Gender and condylar differences in distal femur morphometry clarified by automated computer analyses.

Authors:  Kang Li; Evan Langdale; Scott Tashman; Christopher Harner; Xudong Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Coronal alignment is a predictor of the rotational geometry of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee.

Authors:  T Luyckx; F Zambianchi; F Catani; J Bellemans; J Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  15 in total

1.  Using the anatomical tibial axis for total knee arthroplasty alignment may lead to an internal rotation error.

Authors:  Csaba Forster-Horvath; Valerie Kremo; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Andrej Maria Nowakowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Usefulness of long tibial axis to measure medial tibial slope for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Y Akamatsu; M Sotozawa; H Kobayashi; Y Kusayama; K Kumagai; T Saito
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The orientation of the surgical epicondylar axis varies in varus and non-varus knees in the coronal plane.

Authors:  Yunjie Zhang; Xiaofeng Wang; Yunchao Shao; Qing Xia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The shape and orientation of the trochlea run more parallel to the posterior condylar line than generally believed.

Authors:  C Vercruysse; H Vandenneucker; J Bellemans; L Scheys; T Luyckx
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The plane of the distal femur anterior cortex is a useful index for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Baoxi Yu; Ming Fu; Zhiqi Zhang; Peihui Wu; Zhiyu Huang; Hong Sun
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-26

6.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: anthropometric measurements with CT-based patient-specific instruments planning show high variability of the posterior condylar angle.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont; Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab; Frederic Paternostre; Peter Koch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Referencing the sulcus line of the trochlear groove and removing intraoperative parallax errors improve femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon Talbot; Pandelis Dimitriou; Michael Mullen; John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Computed tomography is not necessary to assess rotation of the femoral component in navigation-assisted total knee replacement.

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Alfonso Noriega-Fernandez; Ivan Perez-Coto; Manuel A Sandoval García; Andres A Sierra-Pereira; Sergio Roncero-Gonzalez; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Carreira
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Averaging rotational landmarks during total knee arthroplasty reduces component malrotation caused by femoral asymmetry.

Authors:  Tat Woon Chao; Liam Geraghty; Pandelis Dimitriou; Simon Talbot
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Combined Rotational Alignment Change after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Different Tibial Component Designs: Implications for Optimal Tibial Component Rotational Alignment.

Authors:  Seung Joon Rhee; Jae Young Cho; Seung Hyeon Jeung; Kein Boon Poon; Yoon Young Choi; Jeung Tak Suh
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.