Literature DB >> 12616177

Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

Steven J Linton1, Katja Boersma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the predictive utility of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in identifying patients at risk for developing persistent back pain problems.
DESIGN: Prospective, where participants completed the questionnaire and their cases were followed for 6 months to assess outcome with regard to pain, function, and absenteeism due to sickness. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seven patients, recruited from seven primary care units.
RESULTS: Discriminant analyses showed that the items on the questionnaire were significantly related to future problems. For absenteeism due to sickness, 68% of the patients were correctly classified into one of three groups, whereas an even distribution would have produced 33%. The analyses for function correctly classified 81%, and for pain 71%, into one of two groups, compared with a chance level of 50%. A total score analysis demonstrated that a cutoff score of 90 points had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 65% for absenteeism due to sickness, and a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 79% for functional ability.
CONCLUSIONS: The results underscore that psychological variables are related to outcome 6 months later, and they replicate and extend earlier findings indicating that the Orebro Screening Questionnaire is a clinically reliable and valid instrument. The total score was a relatively good predictor of future absenteeism due to sickness as well as function, but not of pain. The results suggest that the instrument could be of value in isolating patients in need of early interventions and may promote the use of appropriate interventions for patients with psychological risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12616177     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200303000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  132 in total

1.  Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gareth T Jones; Ruth E Johnson; Nicola J Wiles; Carol Chaddock; Richard G Potter; Chris Roberts; Deborah P M Symmons; Gary J Macfarlane
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Implementing the work disability prevention paradigm among therapists in Hong Kong: facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Andy S K Cheng; Edwin W C Lee; Eva Schonstein; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  How is recovery from low back pain measured? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Tasha R Stanton; Christopher M Williams; Christopher G Maher; Julia M Hush
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Problematic pain - redefining how we view pain?

Authors:  Chris Barker; Ann Taylor; Martin Johnson
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2014-02

5.  Secondary prevention of work disability: community-based psychosocial intervention for musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Michael J L Sullivan; L Charles Ward; Dean Tripp; Douglas J French; Heather Adams; William D Stanish
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

6.  Predicting return to work after low back injury using the Psychosocial Risk for Occupational Disability Instrument: a validation study.

Authors:  I Z Schultz; J Crook; J Berkowitz; R Milner; G R Meloche
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

7.  Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; T Kohlmann; M Pfingsten; G Lindena; U Marnitz; K Pfeifer; J F Chenot
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Clinical prediction rule for return to work after back pain.

Authors:  Christopher Maher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Occupational advice to help people return to work following lower limb arthroplasty: the OPAL intervention mapping study.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Carol Coole; Avril Drummond; Sayeed Khan; Catriona McDaid; Catherine Hewitt; Lucksy Kottam; Sarah Ronaldson; Elizabeth Coleman; David A McDonald; Fiona Nouri; Melanie Narayanasamy; Iain McNamara; Judith Fitch; Louise Thomson; Gerry Richardson; Amar Rangan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity.

Authors:  Katie A Butera; Steven Z George; Trevor A Lentz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.