Literature DB >> 35496720

Discriminative and Predictive Analysis of the Brazilian Version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) Short-Form in Patients With Low Back Pain.

Fernanda F Fuhro1, Felipe R C Fagundes1, Ana Carolina T Manzoni1, Cristina M N Cabral1.   

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the discriminative and predictive validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire Short-Form (ÖMPSQ-Short).
Methods: In this prospective longitudinal cohort study, the ÖMPSQ-Short was administered to 150 patients with acute, subacute, and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A 6-month follow-up was also completed to assess the predictive ability of the questionnaire for risk of pain, disability, and absence from work. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire, pain numerical rating scale, and additional questions related to work and absence from work were also used.
Results: The ÖMPSQ-Short cutoff point was determined by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity, which yielded a value of 44 points for the Brazilian population. Analysis of the 2 × 2 contingency tables showed that the ÖMPSQ-Short correctly classified high-risk patients with pain. Predictive capacity was assessed by univariate linear regression analysis. The ÖMPSQ-Short was able to predict pain, disability, and absence from work in patients with acute pain and disability in patients with subacute pain, and disability and absence from work in patients with chronic pain, but with a small predictive capacity.
Conclusion: The ÖMPSQ-Short cutoff demonstrated the ability to classify patients with low and high risk of involvement of psychosocial factors. However, due to its small predictive capacity, we suggest that the ÖMPSQ-Short should not be used to predict pain, disability, and absence from work over 6 months. However, we recommend using it as a guide to discuss the patient's clinical condition.
© 2022 by National University of Health Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic Pain; Disability Evaluation; Low Back Pain; Work

Year:  2022        PMID: 35496720      PMCID: PMC9051136          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2021.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  31 in total

1.  Predicting chronicity in acute back pain: validation of a French translation of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.

Authors:  O Nonclercq; A Berquin
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-03-27

2.  Psychometric characteristics of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Functional Rating Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Chris G Maher; Jane Latimer; Paulo Henrique Ferreira; Giovanni Campos Pozzi; Rodrigo Nogueira Ribeiro
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; K Halldén
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Low back pain: a call for action.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Maurits van Tulder; Birgitta Öberg; Lucíola Menezes Costa; Anthony Woolf; Mark Schoene; Peter Croft
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Prediction of outcome in patients with low back pain--A prospective cohort study comparing clinicians' predictions with those of the Start Back Tool.

Authors:  Alice Kongsted; Cathrine Hedegaard Andersen; Martin Mørk Hansen; Lise Hestbaek
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-06-23

6.  Measuring psychosocial variables in patients with (sub) acute low back pain complaints, at risk for chronicity: a validation study of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire-Dutch Language Version.

Authors:  Hans Heneweer; Nienke J van Woudenberg; Frank van Genderen; Luc Vanhees; Harriet Wittink
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Low back and radicular pain: a pathway for care developed by the British Pain Society.

Authors:  J Lee; S Gupta; C Price; A P Baranowski
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Katja Boersma
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best?

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Chris G Maher; Jane Latimer; Paulo Henrique Ferreira; Manuela Loureiro Ferreira; Giovanni Campos Pozzi; Ludmilla Motta Andrade Freitas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.