Literature DB >> 15834343

Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: patients consulting primary care for the first time.

Margreth Grotle1, Jens I Brox, Merit B Veierød, Bredo Glomsrød, Jan H Lønn, Nina K Vøllestad.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Inception cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical course of acute low back pain and to evaluate prognostic factors for nonrecovery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have explored clinical course and prognostic factors in patients who consult primary care for their first time because of an episode of low back pain of <3 weeks duration.
METHODS: A total of 123 patients with acute low back pain <3 weeks consulting primary care for the first time were included, and 120 completed 3 months follow-up. Baseline assessments included sociodemographic characteristics, back pain history and current status, psychological questionnaires and clinical examination. Main outcome measures were pain intensity, disability by Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, and recovery of disability. Potential prognostic factors for recovery or not were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: At 4 weeks and 3 months 76% of the patients had recovered. Mean pain intensity and mean disability scores dropped 58% and 68%, respectively, of initial levels during the 3 months. The proportion with sickness absence was 8% at 4 weeks and 6% at 3 months. Several sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors were of prognostic value. Compared with their respective reference categories, age above 45 years (odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 1.4-14.0), smoking (3.0, 1.1-8.5), two or more neurological signs (4.6, 1.4-14.9), a score of >or=90 on the psychosocial screening (3.1, 1.0-9.4), and high levels of distress (4.1, 1.3-12.8) were the best prognostic factors of nonrecovery at 3 months.
CONCLUSION: During a period of 3 months, 24% of the patients had not recovered. Psychological factors and neurological signs were strongly associated with nonrecovery at 3 months. In addition to the traditional examination of neurological symptoms and signs, psychological factors should be considered already at the initial visit of an episode of low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15834343     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158972.34102.6f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  54 in total

Review 1.  How is recovery from low back pain measured? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Tasha R Stanton; Christopher M Williams; Christopher G Maher; Julia M Hush
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Initial pain and disability characteristics can assist the prediction of the centralization phenomenon on initial assessment of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Alon Rabin; Yaniv Shmushkevich; Leonid Kalichman
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-11-05

3.  Alexithymia and 7.5-year incidence of compensated low back pain in 1207 urban public transit operators.

Authors:  Wolf E Mehling; Niklas Krause
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian D Mallen; George Peat; Elaine Thomas; Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Nina K Vøllestad; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?

Authors:  Audrey Long; Stephen May; Tak Fung
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

7.  Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Mark J Hancock; Christopher G Maher; Jane Latimer
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

8.  Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster; Elaine Thomas; Annette Bishop; Kate M Dunn; Chris J Main
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 7.926

9.  Pelvic girdle pain--associations between risk factors in early pregnancy and disability or pain intensity in late pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hilde Stendal Robinson; Marit B Veierød; Anne Marit Mengshoel; Nina K Vøllestad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Extending conceptual frameworks: life course epidemiology for the study of back pain.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.