PURPOSE: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of parallel-imaging compressed-sensing 4D phase contrast (PICS-4DPC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) venous flow quantification in children with patients referred for cardiac MRI at our children's hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance, 22 consecutive patients without shunts underwent 4DPC as part of clinical cardiac MRI examinations. Flow measurements were obtained in the superior and inferior vena cava, ascending and descending aorta, and the pulmonary trunk. Conservation of flow to the upper, lower, and whole body was used as an internal physiologic control. The arterial and venous flow rates at each location were compared with paired t-tests and F-tests to assess relative accuracy and precision. RESULTS: Arterial and venous flow measurements were strongly correlated with the upper (ρ = 0.89), lower (ρ = 0.96), and whole body (ρ = 0.97); net aortic and pulmonary trunk flow rates were also tightly correlated (ρ = 0.97). There was no significant difference in the value or precision of arterial and venous flow measurements in upper, lower, or whole body, although there was a trend toward improved precision with lower velocity-encoding settings. CONCLUSION: With PICS-4DPC MRI, the accuracy and precision of venous flow quantification are comparable to that of arterial flow quantification at velocity-encodings appropriate for arterial vessels.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of parallel-imaging compressed-sensing 4D phase contrast (PICS-4DPC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) venous flow quantification in children with patients referred for cardiac MRI at our children's hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance, 22 consecutive patients without shunts underwent 4DPC as part of clinical cardiac MRI examinations. Flow measurements were obtained in the superior and inferior vena cava, ascending and descending aorta, and the pulmonary trunk. Conservation of flow to the upper, lower, and whole body was used as an internal physiologic control. The arterial and venous flow rates at each location were compared with paired t-tests and F-tests to assess relative accuracy and precision. RESULTS: Arterial and venous flow measurements were strongly correlated with the upper (ρ = 0.89), lower (ρ = 0.96), and whole body (ρ = 0.97); net aortic and pulmonary trunk flow rates were also tightly correlated (ρ = 0.97). There was no significant difference in the value or precision of arterial and venous flow measurements in upper, lower, or whole body, although there was a trend toward improved precision with lower velocity-encoding settings. CONCLUSION: With PICS-4DPC MRI, the accuracy and precision of venous flow quantification are comparable to that of arterial flow quantification at velocity-encodings appropriate for arterial vessels.
Authors: M Markl; R Bammer; M T Alley; C J Elkins; M T Draney; A Barnett; M E Moseley; G H Glover; N J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Albert Hsiao; Michael Lustig; Marcus T Alley; Mark Murphy; Frandics P Chan; Robert J Herfkens; Shreyas S Vasanawala Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Michael Markl; Mary T Draney; Michael D Hope; Jonathan M Levin; Frandics P Chan; Marcus T Alley; Norbert J Pelc; Robert J Herfkens Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Michael Markl; Frandics P Chan; Marcus T Alley; Kris L Wedding; Mary T Draney; Chris J Elkins; David W Parker; Ryan Wicker; Charles A Taylor; Robert J Herfkens; Norbert J Pelc Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Michal Schäfer; Cynthia Myers; R Dale Brown; Maria G Frid; Wei Tan; Kendall Hunter; Kurt R Stenmark Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Emilie Bollache; Alex J Barker; Ryan Scott Dolan; James C Carr; Pim van Ooij; Rouzbeh Ahmadian; Alex Powell; Jeremy D Collins; Julia Geiger; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Liliana E Ma; Michael Markl; Kelvin Chow; Hyungkyu Huh; Christoph Forman; Alireza Vali; Andreas Greiser; James Carr; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker; Ning Jin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Florian Schuchardt; Laure Schroeder; Constantin Anastasopoulos; Michael Markl; Jochen Bäuerle; Anja Hennemuth; Johann Drexl; José M Valdueza; Irina Mader; Andreas Harloff Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Zoran Stankovic; Bernd Jung; Jeremy Collins; Maximilian F Russe; James Carr; Wulf Euringer; Lena Stehlin; Zoltan Csatari; Peter C Strohm; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Albert Hsiao; Ufra Yousaf; Marcus T Alley; Michael Lustig; Frandics Pak Chan; Beverley Newman; Shreyas S Vasanawala Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 4.813