Literature DB >> 23167639

The decision-making process of young adult women with cancer who considered fertility cryopreservation.

Patricia E Hershberger1, Lorna Finnegan, Penny F Pierce, Bert Scoccia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide an in-depth description of the decision-making process that women who are diagnosed with cancer undergo as they decide whether to accept or decline fertility cryopreservation.
DESIGN: A qualitative, grounded theory approach. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven women (mean age = 29 years) who were diagnosed with cancer and were eligible for egg, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation were recruited from the Internet and two university centers.
METHODS: Each woman participated in a semistructured interview by phone (n = 21) or e-mail (n = 6). Data were analyzed using the constant-comparative method to inductively ascertain the women's decision-making process. NVivo 8 software was used to assist with data retrieval and analysis.
RESULTS: The decision-making process consists of four major phases that women experience to actively formulate a decision: identify, contemplate, resolve, and engage. In the identify phase, women acquire knowledge and experience a "double hit" scenario that is often devastating. Within the contemplate phase, five interrelated dimensions emerged including constructing and/or endorsing preferences and values and undergoing decisional debriefing sessions. A decision is reached in the resolve phase and carried out in the engage phase. Among the participants, 14 declined fertility cryopreservation and 13 accepted egg and/or embryo cryopreservation.
CONCLUSION: The descriptive theoretical framework clarifies the underlying processes that women with cancer undergo to decide about fertility cryopreservation. Quality of care for women with cancer can be improved by implementing appropriately timed information and tailored developmental and contextual counseling to support decision making.
© 2012 AWHONN, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23167639      PMCID: PMC4164048          DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01426.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  38 in total

1.  The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: initial findings from a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Karen Kavanaugh; Ellen Olshansky; Alan Schwartz; Ilan Tur-Kaspa
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Development of an informational web site for recruiting research participants: process, implementation, and evaluation.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Karen Kavanaugh; Rebekah Hamilton; Susan C Klock; Lisa Merry; Ellen Olshansky; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Age-related differences in the quality of life of breast carcinoma patients after treatment.

Authors:  L B Wenzel; D L Fairclough; M J Brady; D Cella; K M Garrett; B C Kluhsman; L A Crane; A C Marcus
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a procedure with promise, risks, and a need for a registry.

Authors:  Lisa A Kolp; Ziad Hubayter
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Creating a continuum of care: integrating obstetricians and gynecologists in the care of young cancer patients.

Authors:  Betty Y Kong; Robin M Skory; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Variation in distress among women with infertility: evidence from a population-based sample.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Karina M Shreffler; Lone Schmidt; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Otis Brawley; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 8.  Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ana Cobo; César Diaz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Dominick Frosch; Angelo E Volandes; Adrian Edwards; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Fertility preservation for female cancer patients: early clinical experience.

Authors:  Susan C Klock; John X Zhang; Ralph R Kazer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Psychological Counseling of Female Fertility Preservation Patients.

Authors:  Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Mary Ellen Pavone; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Kristin N Smith; Ralph R Kazer
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2015

2.  Adoption and cancer survivors: Findings from a learning activity for oncology nurses.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Bradley J Zebrack; Ivana Sehovic; Meghan L Bowman; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Young Adult Female Cancer Survivors' Decision Regret About Fertility Preservation.

Authors:  Catherine Benedict; Bridgette Thom; Joanne F Kelvin
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Priorities in Fertility Decisions for Reproductive-Aged Cancer Patients: Fertility Attitudes and Cancer Treatment Study.

Authors:  Dina M Flink; Laxmi A Kondapalli; Yvonne Kellar-Guenther
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Toward theoretical understanding of the fertility preservation decision-making process: examining information processing among young women with cancer.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Lorna Finnegan; Susan Altfeld; Sara Lake; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Adherence of Primary Care Physicians to Evidence-Based Recommendations to Reduce Ovarian Cancer Mortality.

Authors:  Sherri L Stewart; Julie S Townsend; Mary C Puckett; Sun Hee Rim
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Reasons Why Young Women Accept or Decline Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Heather Sipsma; Lorna Finnegan; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2015-11-25

8.  Comparing appropriateness and equivalence of email interviews to phone interviews in qualitative research on reproductive decisions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Karen Kavanaugh
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.257

9.  Medical egg freezing: the importance of a patient-centered approach to fertility preservation.

Authors:  Marcia C Inhorn; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Lynn M Westphal; Joseph Doyle; Norbert Gleicher; Dror Meirow; Hila Raanani; Martha Dirnfeld; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  "Will It Affect Our Chances of Having Children?" and Feeling "Like a Ticking Bomb" -The Fertility Concerns and Fears of Cancer Progression and Recurrence in Cancer Treatment Decision-Making Among Young Women Diagnosed With Gynaecological or Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sobota; Gozde Ozakinci
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.