Gwendolyn P Quinn1,2, Bradley J Zebrack3, Ivana Sehovic1, Meghan L Bowman1, Susan T Vadaparampil1,2. 1. Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida. 2. Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. 3. School of Social Work, University of Michigan School of Social Work, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the rate at which cancer survivors successfully adopt a child or about their experiences negotiating a costly, and perhaps discriminatory, process regarding the prospective parent's health history. The current study describes the results of a learning activity in which nurses contacted an adoption agency to learn more about the process for survivors with the goal of helping nurses provide patients with accurate information for making a well-informed decision regarding adoption. METHODS: Training program participants identified an adoption agency (local, state, or international) and conducted an interview using a semistructured guide. After the interview, participants created a summary of responses to the questions. The authors examined responses to each question using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 77 participants (98% completion rate) across 15 states provided a summary. Responses were distributed across the following categories: adoption costs, steps required for survivors seeking adoption, challenges for survivors seeking adoption, birth parents' reservations, and planned institutional changes to increase adoption awareness. The majority of respondents reported improving their knowledge of adoption and cancer, increased challenges for survivors, and the need to educate patients concerning the realities of adoption policies. The need for a letter stating the survivor was 5 years cancer free was identified as a significant obstacle for survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses are charged with following practice guidelines that include recommendations for appropriate reproductive health referrals. Cancer survivors would benefit from a health care provider who can provide education and concrete information when patients are making a decision about fertility and adoption.
BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the rate at which cancer survivors successfully adopt a child or about their experiences negotiating a costly, and perhaps discriminatory, process regarding the prospective parent's health history. The current study describes the results of a learning activity in which nurses contacted an adoption agency to learn more about the process for survivors with the goal of helping nurses provide patients with accurate information for making a well-informed decision regarding adoption. METHODS: Training program participants identified an adoption agency (local, state, or international) and conducted an interview using a semistructured guide. After the interview, participants created a summary of responses to the questions. The authors examined responses to each question using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 77 participants (98% completion rate) across 15 states provided a summary. Responses were distributed across the following categories: adoption costs, steps required for survivors seeking adoption, challenges for survivors seeking adoption, birth parents' reservations, and planned institutional changes to increase adoption awareness. The majority of respondents reported improving their knowledge of adoption and cancer, increased challenges for survivors, and the need to educate patients concerning the realities of adoption policies. The need for a letter stating the survivor was 5 years cancer free was identified as a significant obstacle for survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses are charged with following practice guidelines that include recommendations for appropriate reproductive health referrals. Cancer survivors would benefit from a health care provider who can provide education and concrete information when patients are making a decision about fertility and adoption.
Authors: K Wasilewski-Masker; K D Seidel; W Leisenring; A C Mertens; M Shnorhavorian; C W Ritenour; M Stovall; D M Green; C A Sklar; G T Armstrong; L L Robison; L R Meacham Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Sara E Barton; Julie S Najita; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Wendy M Leisenring; Marilyn Stovall; Rita E Weathers; Charles A Sklar; Leslie L Robison; Lisa Diller Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-07-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Heather Clayton; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Ji-Hyun Lee; Lindsey M King; Cheryl A Miree; Michael Nieder; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Carrie L Nieman; Karen E Kinahan; Susan E Yount; Sarah K Rosenbloom; Kathleen J Yost; Elizabeth A Hahn; Timothy Volpe; Kimberley J Dilley; Laurie Zoloth; Teresa K Woodruff Journal: Cancer Treat Res Date: 2007
Authors: Taylor L Morgan; Braedon P Young; Keagan G Lipak; Vicky Lehmann; James Klosky; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; Meghan Bowman Curci; Richard R Reich; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Susan T Vadaparampil; Clement K Gwede; Cathy Meade; Joanne Kelvin; Richard R Reich; Joyce Reinecke; Meghan Bowman; Ivana Sehovic; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-05-17
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; Teresa K Woodruff; Caprice A Knapp; Meghan Lorraine Bowman; Joyce Reinecke; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Jessica R Gorman; Brian W Whitcomb; Daniel Standridge; Vanessa L Malcarne; Sally A D Romero; Samantha A Roberts; H Irene Su Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Susan T Vadaparampil; Juliette Christie; Meghan Bowman; Ivana Sehovic; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: J Contin Educ Nurs Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 1.224
Authors: Janella N Hudson; Nathanael B Stanley; Leena Nahata; Meghan Bowman-Curci; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care Date: 2017-03-28