Dina M Flink1, Laxmi A Kondapalli2, Yvonne Kellar-Guenther3. 1. 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado. 2. 2 Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine , Lone Tree, Colorado. 3. 3 School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora, Colorado.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Fertility Attitudes and Cancer Treatment Study (FACTS) aims at better understanding the reasons and priorities of young adult cancer patients making decisions for fertility preservation (FP). Identifying the factors that center around a patient's fertility decisions will support the development of educational tools for providers and improve clinical care to meet patients' reproductive needs. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted of 27 newly diagnosed male and female cancer patients who had presented for an oncofertility consultation. Interviews lasted ∼30 minutes and were transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was conducted to explore the factors driving decisions for future fertility. Themes were grouped to address the following topics: reasons for/against FP, patient priorities, informational needs, support, wellness, and satisfaction with information. Strength of the theme was determined by examining the frequency of a response. RESULTS: Patients who chose FP versus those who did not choose FP and men versus women proved to be more similar than different in their reasoning, priorities, and informational needs for FP decisions. Patients who chose FP identified a "concern for future fertility" as a top reason to do so and "parenthood" as a top priority. For those who did not choose FP, "cancer treatment" was identified as their top priority. For patients identifying financial barriers, 50% of them were able to overcome this to pursue FP. CONCLUSIONS: Reproductive-aged patients diagnosed with a new cancer should be referred to a reproductive specialist and provided the opportunity to come to a fertility decision on their own before initiating cancer treatment.
PURPOSE: The Fertility Attitudes and Cancer Treatment Study (FACTS) aims at better understanding the reasons and priorities of young adult cancerpatients making decisions for fertility preservation (FP). Identifying the factors that center around a patient's fertility decisions will support the development of educational tools for providers and improve clinical care to meet patients' reproductive needs. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted of 27 newly diagnosed male and female cancerpatients who had presented for an oncofertility consultation. Interviews lasted ∼30 minutes and were transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was conducted to explore the factors driving decisions for future fertility. Themes were grouped to address the following topics: reasons for/against FP, patient priorities, informational needs, support, wellness, and satisfaction with information. Strength of the theme was determined by examining the frequency of a response. RESULTS:Patients who chose FP versus those who did not choose FP and men versus women proved to be more similar than different in their reasoning, priorities, and informational needs for FP decisions. Patients who chose FP identified a "concern for future fertility" as a top reason to do so and "parenthood" as a top priority. For those who did not choose FP, "cancer treatment" was identified as their top priority. For patients identifying financial barriers, 50% of them were able to overcome this to pursue FP. CONCLUSIONS: Reproductive-aged patients diagnosed with a new cancer should be referred to a reproductive specialist and provided the opportunity to come to a fertility decision on their own before initiating cancer treatment.
Authors: Rebecca J Lee; Ann Wakefield; Sharon Foy; Sacha J Howell; Andrew M Wardley; Anne C Armstrong Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Ursula Balthazar; Allison M Deal; Marc A Fritz; Laxmi A Kondapalli; Ja Yeon Kim; Jennifer E Mersereau Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Bethany A Bell-Ellison; Clement K Gwede; Terrance L Albrecht Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: William Hart; Dolores Albarracín; Alice H Eagly; Inge Brechan; Matthew J Lindberg; Lisa Merrill Journal: Psychol Bull Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 17.737
Authors: Andrea C Johnson; Darren Mays; Kathryn Rehberg; Aziza Shad; Kenneth P Tercyak Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Janella N Hudson; Nathanael B Stanley; Leena Nahata; Meghan Bowman-Curci; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care Date: 2017-03-28
Authors: Julia Stal; Serena Y Yi; Sally Cohen-Cutler; Phuong Gallagher; Afsaneh Barzi; David R Freyer; Joel E Milam; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Kimberly A Miller Journal: Oncologist Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 5.837