Literature DB >> 3733536

Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave.

B M Johnstone, R Patuzzi, G K Yates.   

Abstract

From the original measurements of G. von Békésy (1942) until a few years ago, the basilar membrane was considered to undergo simple passive linear vibration. Recent measurements have completely altered this notion. It is now known that the BM is highly non linear and very sharply tuned. Indeed, BM can now account for most of the properties of the eighth nerve response to sound. The non linearity can be approximated by a hyperbolic function and appears to be part of an active process in the outer hair cell. At the characteristic frequency, CAP threshold (10 dB SPL) corresponds to 0.3 nm motion and the non linearity shows half saturation at 10 nm. The sigmoid shape of the full range BM input-output curve is due to the combination of a less sensitive linear passive component with the added sensitivity of the active non linear function. A hyperbolic input-output function is also present in the cochlear microphonics, and at low frequencies the half saturation value again corresponds to 10 nm BM displacement. With induced threshold loss (e.g. noise trauma) the nonlinearity disappears from the BM, but is still present in the CM. This suggests that the pathology is in the active mechanical feedback process, rather than in the receptor system. It appears that BM mechanics at low amplitudes near the resonant frequency is controlled by a nonlinear mechano-electrical transducer followed by a vulnerable, linear, active mechanism (electro-mechanical?) feeding back in positive phase onto BM vibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3733536     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90090-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  32 in total

1.  Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Limiting frequency of the cochlear amplifier based on electromotility of outer hair cells.

Authors:  Mark Ospeck; Xiao-xia Dong; Kuni H Iwasa
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Signaling by sensory receptors.

Authors:  David Julius; Jeremy Nathans
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Current aspects of hearing loss from occupational and leisure noise.

Authors:  S Plontke; H-P Zenner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-12-28

6.  Theoretical conditions for high-frequency hair bundle oscillations in auditory hair cells.

Authors:  Jong-Hoon Nam; Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Auditory responses in the barn owl's nucleus laminaris to clicks: impulse response and signal analysis of neurophonic potential.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane.

Authors:  I J Russell; K E Nilsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; A Recio; S S Narayan; L Robles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.