Literature DB >> 8675844

Pitch of iterated rippled noise.

W A Yost1.   

Abstract

Iterated rippled noise (IRN) stimuli are generated by a cascade of delay (d), gain (g), and add networks. The matched pitch of IRN stimuli was determined as a function of the type of network used to generate IRN stimuli, the delay (d = 2, 4, and 8 ms), the number of iterations (n = 1,2,3,4,6,8) of the delay and add networks, and whether the delayed noise was added (g = 1) to or subtracted (g = -1) from the undelayed noise. The matched pitch of IRN stimuli did not depend on the type of network. When g = 1 (addition), the matched pitch did not depend on the number of stages of iterations (n) and was always equal to the reciprocal of the delay (1/d). When g = -1 (subtraction), the match pitch depended on n. When n = 1, the matched pitch of IRN stimuli was ambiguous having two pitches in the region of 1/d +/- 10%. When n = 8, the match pitch was equal to 1/2d. This change in the pitch occurred between n = 2 and 6. The results are discussed in terms of spectral and temporal models of complex pitch processing. A temporal model based on autocorrelation was able to provide quantitative predictions for the pitch of these IRN stimuli. However, a spectral type of model can also account for the pitch of these IRN stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8675844     DOI: 10.1121/1.415873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  41 in total

1.  Pitch perception: a dynamical-systems perspective.

Authors:  J H Cartwright; D L González; O Piro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Perception of the missing fundamental by chinchillas in the presence of low-pass masking noise.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-25

4.  Discrimination of first- and second-order regular intervals from random intervals as a function of high-pass filter cutoff frequency.

Authors:  William A Yost; Dan Mapes-Riordan; Raymond Dye; Stanley Sheft; William Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Some problems in the measurement of the frequency-resolving ability of hearing.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

6.  Pitch strength of regular-interval click trains with different length "runs" of regular intervals.

Authors:  William A Yost; Dan Mapes-Riordan; William Shofner; Raymond Dye; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Language-dependent changes in pitch-relevant neural activity in the auditory cortex reflect differential weighting of temporal attributes of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yi Xu; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.710

8.  Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel E Shearer; Michelle R Molis; Keri O Bennett; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Perception of the pitch of unresolved harmonics by 3- and 7-month-old human infants.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.