Literature DB >> 23643050

Determination of the interfacial rheological properties of a poly(DL-lactic acid)-encapsulated contrast agent using in vitro attenuation and scattering.

Shirshendu Paul1, Daniel Russakow, Tyler Rodgers, Kausik Sarkar, Michael Cochran, Margaret A Wheatley.   

Abstract

The stabilizing encapsulation of a microbubble-based ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) critically affects its acoustic properties. Polymers, which behave differently from materials commonly used (i.e., lipids or proteins) for monolayer encapsulation, have the potential for better stability and improved control of encapsulation properties. Air-filled microbubbles coated with poly(DL-lactic acid) (PLA) are characterized here using in vitro acoustic experiments and several models of encapsulation. The interfacial rheological properties of the encapsulation are determined according to each model using attenuation of ultrasound through a suspension of microbubbles. Then the model predictions are compared with scattered non-linear (sub- and second harmonic) responses. For this microbubble population (average diameter, 1.9 μm), the peak in attenuation measurement indicates a weighted-average resonance frequency of 2.5-3 MHz, which, in contrast to other encapsulated microbubbles, is lower than the resonance frequency of a free bubble of similar size (diameter, 1.9 μm). This apparently contradictory result stems from the extremely low surface dilational elasticity (around 0.01-0.07 N/m) and the reduced surface tension of the poly(DL-lactic acid) encapsulation, as well as the polydispersity of the bubble population. All models considered here are shown to behave similarly even in the non-linear regime because of the low surface dilational elasticity value. Pressure-dependent scattering measurements at two different excitation frequencies (2.25 and 3 MHz) revealed strongly non-linear behavior with 25-30 dB and 5-20 dB enhancements in fundamental and second-harmonic responses, respectively, for a contrast agent concentration of 1.33 μg/mL in the suspension. Sub-harmonic responses are registered above a relatively low generation threshold of 100-150 kPa, with up to 20 dB enhancement beyond that pressure. Numerical predictions from all models show good agreement with the experimentally measured fundamental response, but not with the experimental second-harmonic response. The characteristic features of sub-harmonic responses and the steady response beyond the threshold are matched well by model predictions. However, prediction of the threshold value depends on estimated properties and size distribution. The variation in size distribution from sample to sample leads to variation in estimates of encapsulation properties: the lowest estimated value for surface dilational viscosity better predicts the sub-harmonic threshold.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643050      PMCID: PMC3674163          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  40 in total

1.  In vitro echogenicity characterization of poly[lactide-coglycolide] (plga) microparticles and preliminary in vivo ultrasound enhancement study for ultrasound contrast agent application.

Authors:  Sonia Lavisse; Angelo Paci; Valerie Rouffiac; Cecile Adotevi; Paule Opolon; Pierre Peronneau; Philippe Bourget; Alain Roche; Michel Perricaudet; Elias Fattal; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Dhiman Chatterjee; Kausik Sarkar; Pankaj Jain; Nathan E Schreppler
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Polymeric ultrasound contrast agents targeted to integrins: importance of process methods and surface density of ligands.

Authors:  Margaret A Wheatley; Justin D Lathia; Kelleny L Oum
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.988

4.  Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Method for microbubble characterization using primary radiation force.

Authors:  Hendrik J Vos; Francesco Guidi; Enrico Boni; Piero Tortoli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Characterization of acoustic properties of PVA-shelled ultrasound contrast agents: ultrasound-induced fracture (part II).

Authors:  Dmitry Grishenkov; Claudio Pecorari; Torkel B Brismar; Gaio Paradossi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Effect of shell type on the in vivo backscatter from polymer-encapsulated microbubbles.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Justin D Lathia; Daniel A Merton; Ji-Bin Liu; Ngocyen T Le; Barry B Goldberg; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  In vitro measurement of attenuation and nonlinear scattering from echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Daniel Russakow; Rahul Nahire; Tapas Nandy; Avinash H Ambre; Kalpana Katti; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Growth and dissolution of an encapsulated contrast microbubble: effects of encapsulation permeability.

Authors:  Kausik Sarkar; Amit Katiyar; Pankaj Jain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Ultrasound triggered cell death in vitro with doxorubicin loaded poly lactic-acid contrast agents.

Authors:  J R Eisenbrey; P Huang; J Hsu; M A Wheatley
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.890

View more
  9 in total

1.  An iterative fullwave simulation approach to multiple scattering in media with randomly distributed microbubbles.

Authors:  Aditya Joshi; Brooks D Lindsey; Paul A Dayton; Gianmarco Pinton; Marie Muller
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Effects of droplet size and perfluorocarbon boiling point on the frequency dependence of acoustic vaporization threshold.

Authors:  Mitra Aliabouzar; Krishna N Kumar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Material Properties, Dissolution and Time Evolution of PEGylated Lipid-Shelled Microbubbles: Effects of the Polyethylene Glycol Hydrophilic Chain Configurations.

Authors:  Roozbeh H Azami; Mitra Aliabouzar; Jenna Osborn; Krishna N Kumar; Flemming Forsberg; John R Eisenbrey; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Acoustic vaporization threshold of lipid-coated perfluoropentane droplets.

Authors:  Mitra Aliabouzar; Krishna N Kumar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Lipid Coated Microbubbles and Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Enhance Chondrogenesis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in 3D Printed Scaffolds.

Authors:  Mitra Aliabouzar; Lijie Grace Zhang; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The relation of Bleomycin Delivery Efficiency to Microbubble Sonodestruction and Cavitation Spectral Characteristics.

Authors:  Martynas Maciulevičius; Mindaugas Tamošiūnas; Mindaugas S Venslauskas; Saulius Šatkauskas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Synchronized Optical and Acoustic Droplet Vaporization for Effective Sonoporation.

Authors:  Wei-Wen Liu; Sy-Han Huang; Pai-Chi Li
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Echogenic Exosomes as ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Jenna Osborn; Jessica E Pullan; James Froberg; Jacob Shreffler; Kara N Gange; Todd Molden; Yongki Choi; Amanda Brooks; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-06-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.