Literature DB >> 36001289

Return to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Following ACL Reconstruction.

Anna Cronström1,2, Eva Tengman3, Charlotte K Häger3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of sustaining a graft rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is high. Contributing risk factors are, however, still not clearly identified.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to identify and quantify risk factors for graft rupture after ACLR.
METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42020140129) based on PRISMA guidelines was performed. MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched from inception to September 2021. Prospective and retrospective studies addressing risk factors for graft rupture after ACLR in males/females of all ages were considered. Meta-analyses using a random effect model (effect measure: odds ratio [OR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) were performed. The GRADE tool was used to assess evidence quality.
RESULTS: Following full-text screening of 310 relevant papers, 117 were eventually included, incorporating up to 133,000 individuals in each meta-analysis. Higher Tegner activity level (≥ 7 vs < 7) at primary injury (OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.69-9.04), increased tibial slope (degrees) (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.26-3.86), lower psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.32-3.61), early surgery (< 12 vs ≥ 12 months) (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.58-2.22), RTS (pre-injury level) (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.21-2.91) and family history of ACL injury (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34-2.31) were all associated with increased odds of graft rupture. Higher age (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.39-0.59), female sex (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.98), fewer self-reported knee symptoms pre-reconstruction (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95) and concomitant cartilage injuries (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.79) instead decreased the odds. Meta-analysis revealed no association between body mass index, smoking, joint laxity, RTS time, knee kinematics, muscle strength or hop performance and graft rupture.
CONCLUSION: Conspicuous risk factors for graft rupture were mainly sports and hereditary related. Few studies investigated function-related modifiable factors or included sports exposure data.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36001289     DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01747-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.928


  232 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injury in football (soccer): a review of the literature from a gender-related perspective.

Authors:  Markus Waldén; Martin Hägglund; Jonas Werner; Jan Ekstrand
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Consequences of a ligament injury on neuromuscular function and relevance to rehabilitation - using the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee as model.

Authors:  Eva Ageberg
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; Jeffrey Lyman; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Justin Roe; James Linklater
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Return to sport matters-longer-term quality of life after ACL reconstruction in people with knee difficulties.

Authors:  S R Filbay; I N Ackerman; T G Russell; K M Crossley
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Return to play, performance, and career duration after anterior cruciate ligament rupture: A case-control study in the five biggest football nations in Europe.

Authors:  Daniel Niederer; Tobias Engeroff; Jan Wilke; Lutz Vogt; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Trends and Demographics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States.

Authors:  Michael P Leathers; Alexa Merz; Jeffrey Wong; Trevor Scott; Jeffrey C Wang; Sharon L Hame
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 7.  Quality of life in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Filbay; A G Culvenor; I N Ackerman; T G Russell; K M Crossley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  Risk of Secondary Injury in Younger Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amelia J Wiggins; Ravi K Grandhi; Daniel K Schneider; Denver Stanfield; Kate E Webster; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Mechanisms, prediction, and prevention of ACL injuries: Cut risk with three sharpened and validated tools.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Mark V Paterno; Carmen E Quatman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  The Effects of Level of Competition, Sport, and Sex on the Incidence of First-Time Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Pamela M Vacek; Maira K Newell; Timothy W Tourville; Helen C Smith; Sandra J Shultz; James R Slauterbeck; Robert J Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.