BACKGROUND: Economic constraints in operating an effective maintenance dialysis program leaves renal transplantation as the only viable option for end-stage renal disease patients in India. Kidney paired donation (KPD) is a rapidly growing modality for facilitating living donor (LD) transplantation for patients who are incompatible with their healthy, willing LD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aim of our study was to report a single-center feasibilities and outcomes of KPD transplantation between 2000 and 2012. We performed KPD transplants in 70 recipients to avoid blood group incompatibility (n = 56) or to avoid a positive crossmatch (n = 14). RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 2.72 ± 2.96 years, one-, five- and ten-year patient survival were 94.6, 81, 81 %, and death-censored graft survival was 96.4, 90.2, 90.2 %, respectively. Ten percent of patients were lost, mainly due to infections (n = 4). There was 14.2 % biopsy-proven acute rejection, and 5.7 % interstitial fibrosis with tubular atrophy eventually leading to graft loss. CONCLUSION: The incidences of acute rejection, patient/graft survival rates were acceptable in our KPD program and, therefore, we believe it should be encouraged. These findings are valuable for encouraging participation of KPD pairs and transplant centers in national KPD program. It should be promoted in centers with low-deceased donor transplantation. Our study findings are relevant in the context of Indian government amending the Transplantation of Human Organs Act to encourage national KPD program. To our knowledge, it is largest single-center report from India.
BACKGROUND: Economic constraints in operating an effective maintenance dialysis program leaves renal transplantation as the only viable option for end-stage renal diseasepatients in India. Kidney paired donation (KPD) is a rapidly growing modality for facilitating living donor (LD) transplantation for patients who are incompatible with their healthy, willing LD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aim of our study was to report a single-center feasibilities and outcomes of KPD transplantation between 2000 and 2012. We performed KPD transplants in 70 recipients to avoid blood group incompatibility (n = 56) or to avoid a positive crossmatch (n = 14). RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 2.72 ± 2.96 years, one-, five- and ten-year patient survival were 94.6, 81, 81 %, and death-censored graft survival was 96.4, 90.2, 90.2 %, respectively. Ten percent of patients were lost, mainly due to infections (n = 4). There was 14.2 % biopsy-proven acute rejection, and 5.7 % interstitial fibrosis with tubular atrophy eventually leading to graft loss. CONCLUSION: The incidences of acute rejection, patient/graft survival rates were acceptable in our KPD program and, therefore, we believe it should be encouraged. These findings are valuable for encouraging participation of KPD pairs and transplant centers in national KPD program. It should be promoted in centers with low-deceased donor transplantation. Our study findings are relevant in the context of Indian government amending the Transplantation of Human Organs Act to encourage national KPD program. To our knowledge, it is largest single-center report from India.
Authors: Robert A Montgomery; Andrea A Zachary; Lloyd E Ratner; Dorry L Segev; Janet M Hiller; Julie Houp; Mathew Cooper; Louis Kavoussi; Thomas Jarrett; James Burdick; Warren R Maley; J Keith Melancon; Tomasz Kozlowski; Christopher E Simpkins; Melissa Phillips; Amol Desai; Vanessa Collins; Brigitte Reeb; Edward Kraus; Hamid Rabb; Mary S Leffell; Daniel S Warren Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Peter Chang; Jagbir Gill; James Dong; Caren Rose; Howard Yan; David Landsberg; Edward H Cole; John S Gill Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Mohan M Rajapurkar; George T John; Ashok L Kirpalani; Georgi Abraham; Sanjay K Agarwal; Alan F Almeida; Sishir Gang; Amit Gupta; Gopesh Modi; Dilip Pahari; Ramdas Pisharody; Jai Prakash; Anuradha Raman; Devinder S Rana; Raj K Sharma; R N Sahoo; Vinay Sakhuja; Ravi Raju Tatapudi; Vivekanand Jha Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Vivek B Kute; Himanshu V Patel; Pankaj R Shah; Pranjal R Modi; Veena R Shah; Sayyed J Rizvi; Bipin C Pal; Manisha P Modi; Priya S Shah; Umesh T Varyani; Pavan S Wakhare; Saiprasad G Shinde; Viajay A Ghodela; Minaxi H Patel; Varsha B Trivedi; Hargovind L Trivedi Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2016-10-16 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: Vivek B Kute; Sanjay K Agarwal; Manisha Sahay; Anant Kumar; Manish Rathi; Narayan Prasad; Rajkumar K Sharma; Krishan L Gupta; Sunil Shroff; Sandip K Saxena; Pankaj R Shah; Pranjal R Modi; Vishwanath Billa; Laxmikant K Tripathi; Sreebhushan Raju; Dhamedndra S Bhadauria; Tarun K Jeloka; Dhananjai Agarwal; Amresh Krishna; Rajshekhar Perumalla; Manoj Jain; Sandeep Guleria; Michael A Rees Journal: Indian J Nephrol Date: 2018 Jan-Feb
Authors: Vivek B Kute; Himanshu V Patel; Pankaj R Shah; Pranjal R Modi; Veena R Shah; Sayyed J Rizvi; Bipin C Pal; Manisha P Modi; Priya S Shah; Umesh T Varyani; Pavan S Wakhare; Saiprasad G Shinde; Vijay A Ghodela; Minaxi H Patel; Varsha B Trivedi; Hargovind L Trivedi Journal: World J Transplant Date: 2017-04-24
Authors: Vivek B Kute; Himanshu V Patel; Umesh T Varyani; Pankaj R Shah; Pranjal R Modi; Veena R Shah; Sayyed J Rizvi; Bipin C Pal; Priya S Shah; Pavan S Wakhare; Vijay A Ghodela; Saiprasad G Shinde; Varsha B Trivedi; Minaxi H Patel; Hargovind L Trivedi Journal: World J Nephrol Date: 2016-11-06
Authors: Irfan Ahmad; Sanjiv Saxena; Ravi Bansal; Rajesh Goel; Prit P Singh; Jagdeep Balyan; Amit S Malhotra; Bhaskar Borah Journal: Indian J Nephrol Date: 2021-01-27