Literature DB >> 16204665

Clinical results from transplanting incompatible live kidney donor/recipient pairs using kidney paired donation.

Robert A Montgomery1, Andrea A Zachary, Lloyd E Ratner, Dorry L Segev, Janet M Hiller, Julie Houp, Mathew Cooper, Louis Kavoussi, Thomas Jarrett, James Burdick, Warren R Maley, J Keith Melancon, Tomasz Kozlowski, Christopher E Simpkins, Melissa Phillips, Amol Desai, Vanessa Collins, Brigitte Reeb, Edward Kraus, Hamid Rabb, Mary S Leffell, Daniel S Warren.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: First proposed 2 decades ago, live kidney paired donation (KPD) was considered a promising new approach to addressing the shortage of organs for transplantation. Ethical, administrative, and logistical barriers initially proved formidable and prevented the implementation of KPD programs in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of KPD for the management of patients with incompatible donors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective series of paired donations matched and transplanted from a pool of blood type or crossmatch incompatible donors and recipients with end-stage renal disease (6 conventional and 4 unconventional KPD transplants) at a US tertiary referral center (between June 2001 and November 2004) with expertise in performing transplants in patients with high immunologic risk. INTERVENTION: Kidney paired donation and live donor renal transplantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient survival, graft survival, serum creatinine levels, rejection episodes.
RESULTS: A total of 22 patients received transplants through 10 paired donations including 2 triple exchanges at Johns Hopkins Hospital. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 1-42 months), the patient survival rate was 100% and the graft survival rate was 95.5%. Twenty-one of the 22 patients have functioning grafts with a median 6-month serum creatinine level of 1.2 mg/dL (range, 0.8-1.8 mg/dL) (106.1 micromol/L [range, 70.7-159.1 micromol/L]). There were no instances of antibody-mediated rejection despite the inclusion of 5 patients who were highly sensitized to HLA antigens due to previous exposure to foreign tissue. Four patients developed acute cellular rejection (18%).
CONCLUSIONS: This series of patients who received transplants from a single-center KPD pool provides evidence that recipients with incompatible live donors, even those with rare blood type combinations or high degrees of HLA antigen sensitization, can receive transplants through KPD with graft survival rates that appear to be equivalent to directed, compatible live donor transplants. If these results can be generalized, broader availability of KPD to the estimated 6000 patients with incompatible donors could result in a large expansion of the donor pool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16204665     DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.13.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  29 in total

1.  Willingness of the United States general public to participate in kidney paired donation.

Authors:  Dorry L Segev; Neil R Powe; Misty U Troll; Nae-Yuh Wang; Robert A Montgomery; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Intermediate-term outcomes with expanded criteria deceased donors in kidney transplantation: a spectrum or specter of quality?

Authors:  Robert J Stratta; Michael S Rohr; Aimee K Sundberg; Alan C Farney; Erica L Hartmann; Phillip S Moore; Jeffrey Rogers; Samy S Iskandar; Michael D Gautreaux; David F Kiger; William Doares; Teresa K Anderson; Gloria Hairston; Patricia L Adams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Barriers to living donor kidney transplantation among black or older transplant candidates.

Authors:  Francis L Weng; Peter P Reese; Shamkant Mulgaonkar; Anup M Patel
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Incentive compatibility in kidney exchange problems.

Authors:  Silvia Villa; Fioravante Patrone
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2009-12

5.  Expand the Pool of Living Donors for Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Jayme E Locke
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Living donor age and kidney allograft half-life: implications for living donor paired exchange programs.

Authors:  Peter Chang; Jagbir Gill; James Dong; Caren Rose; Howard Yan; David Landsberg; Edward H Cole; John S Gill
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Temporal changes in the composition of a large multicenter kidney exchange clearinghouse: Do the hard-to-match accumulate?

Authors:  Courtenay M Holscher; Kyle Jackson; Alvin G Thomas; Christine E Haugen; Sandra R DiBrito; Karina Covarrubias; Sommer E Gentry; Matthew Ronin; Amy D Waterman; Allan B Massie; Jacqueline Garonzik Wang; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Characteristics of compatible pair participants in kidney paired donation at a single center.

Authors:  Francis L Weng; Tracy Grogan; Anup M Patel; Shamkant Mulgaonkar; Marie M Morgievich
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 9.  Incompatible kidney transplantation: lessons from a decade of desensitization and paired kidney exchange.

Authors:  Daniel S Warren; Robert A Montgomery
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.829

10.  Kidney paired donation in the presence of donor-specific antibodies.

Authors:  Jeremy M Blumberg; Hans A Gritsch; Elaine F Reed; J M Cecka; Gerald S Lipshutz; Gabriel M Danovitch; Suzanne McGuire; David W Gjertson; Jeffrey L Veale
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 10.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.