| Literature DB >> 28507916 |
Vivek B Kute1, Himanshu V Patel1, Pankaj R Shah1, Pranjal R Modi1, Veena R Shah1, Sayyed J Rizvi1, Bipin C Pal1, Manisha P Modi1, Priya S Shah1, Umesh T Varyani1, Pavan S Wakhare1, Saiprasad G Shinde1, Vijay A Ghodela1, Minaxi H Patel1, Varsha B Trivedi1, Hargovind L Trivedi1.
Abstract
One third of healthy willing living kidney donors are rejected due to ABO blood group incompatibility and donor specific antibody. This increases pre-transplant dialysis duration leading to increased morbidity and mortality on the kidney transplantation waiting list. Over the last decade kidney paired donation is most rapidly increased source of living kidney donors. In a kidney transplantation program dominated by living donor kidney transplantation, kidney paired donation is a legal and valid alternative strategy to increase living donor kidney transplantation. This is more useful in countries with limited resources where ABO incompatible kidney transplantation or desensitization protocol is not feasible because of costs/infectious complications and deceased donor kidney transplantation is in initial stages. The matching allocation, ABO blood type imbalance, reciprocity, simultaneity, geography were the limitation for the expansion of kidney paired donation. Here we describe different successful ways to increase living donor kidney transplantation through kidney paired donation. Compatible pairs, domino chain, combination of kidney paired donation with desensitization or ABO incompatible transplantation, international kidney paired donation, non-simultaneous, extended, altruistic donor chain and list exchange are different ways to expand the donor pool. In absence of national kidney paired donation program, a dedicated kidney paired donation team will increase access to living donor kidney transplantation in individual centres with team work. Use of social networking sites to expand donor pool, HLA based national kidney paired donation program will increase quality and quantity of kidney paired donation transplantation. Transplant centres should remove the barriers to a broader implementation of multicentre, national kidney paired donation program to further optimize potential of kidney paired donation to increase transplantation of O group and sensitized patients. This review assists in the development of similar programs in other developing countries.Entities:
Keywords: Developing country; Kidney paired donation; Living donor kidney transplantation; Renal replacement therapy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28507916 PMCID: PMC5409913 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i2.134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Transplant ISSN: 2220-3230
Outcome of single center kidney paired donation program India[40-44]
| Duration | 2006-2011 | 2008-2011 | 2010-2013 | 2000-2012 | 2013 |
| Patients ( | 44 | 14 | 26 | 70 | 56 |
| 2-way exchange | 22 | 7 | 13 | 35 | 25 |
| Follow up | 3 yr | 12-18 mo | 20 mo (median) | 2.72 yr (mean) | 1 yr |
| Graft survival | 100% | 100% | 92.30% | 81% | 97.50% |
| Patient survival | 97.70% | 100% | 96.16% | 90% | 94.60% |
| Acute rejection | - | 14.20% | 11.50% | 14.20% | 16% |
| Reason for joining kidney paired donation ( | |||||
| ABO incompatible | 40 | 8 | 26 | 56 | 52 |
| Sensitized | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4 |
Advantages and disadvantages of single vs multicentre kidney paired donation transplant
| Donor pool | Less | More |
| Donor transport | Not required | Required |
| Shipping of kidneys | Not required | Required |
| Surgical team skills | Same | Different |
| Surgical team requirement | More | Less |
| Cold ischemia time | Less | More |
| Hospital atmosphere | Familiar | Unfamiliar |
| Follow up | Same center | Difficult follow up |
| Administrative cost | Less | More |