L Yang1, A V Sycheva, D M Black, R Eastell. 1. Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK. l.yang@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
UNLABELLED: We used new approaches to the analysis of diagnostic scans to detect changes in bone density in different regions of the hip after 3 years of treatment with the zoledronic acid. We showed that the drug significantly increases hip bone density compared to placebo at regions where hip fractures usually occur. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to identify whether treatment with zoledronic acid exerts site-specific differential effects on volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) at the hip. METHODS: We analysed quantitative computed tomography scans of the hip obtained at baseline and 36 months in 179 women participating in the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial. Cortical, trabecular and integral BMDs were determined at three main regions of interest-the femoral neck (FN), trochanter (TR) and total hip (TH)-and several sub-regions of interest, namely the proximal, middle, distal, anterior, posterior, inferomedial and superolateral FN, and the middle and distal TR. RESULTS: Volumetric BMD increased significantly (p < 0.05) from baseline with zoledronic acid compared to placebo. Trabecular vBMD increased as follows: FN, 5.4 %; FN sub-regions, 6.0 % (proximal), 4.4 % (middle), 5.6 % (distal), 7.5 % (anterior), 7.0 % (superolateral) and 5.4 % (posterior); TR, 6.5 % and TH, 5.7 %. Cortical vBMD increased as follows: FN sub-regions, 5.0 % (proximal FN) and 2.3 % (anterior); TR, 4.6 %; middle TR, 2.7 % and TH, 3.8 %. CONCLUSIONS: The effects on vBMD of annual infusion of 5 mg of zoledronic acid are site-specific and dominated by trabecular changes.
UNLABELLED: We used new approaches to the analysis of diagnostic scans to detect changes in bone density in different regions of the hip after 3 years of treatment with the zoledronic acid. We showed that the drug significantly increases hip bone density compared to placebo at regions where hip fractures usually occur. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to identify whether treatment with zoledronic acid exerts site-specific differential effects on volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) at the hip. METHODS: We analysed quantitative computed tomography scans of the hip obtained at baseline and 36 months in 179 women participating in the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial. Cortical, trabecular and integral BMDs were determined at three main regions of interest-the femoral neck (FN), trochanter (TR) and total hip (TH)-and several sub-regions of interest, namely the proximal, middle, distal, anterior, posterior, inferomedial and superolateral FN, and the middle and distal TR. RESULTS: Volumetric BMD increased significantly (p < 0.05) from baseline with zoledronic acid compared to placebo. Trabecular vBMD increased as follows: FN, 5.4 %; FN sub-regions, 6.0 % (proximal), 4.4 % (middle), 5.6 % (distal), 7.5 % (anterior), 7.0 % (superolateral) and 5.4 % (posterior); TR, 6.5 % and TH, 5.7 %. Cortical vBMD increased as follows: FN sub-regions, 5.0 % (proximal FN) and 2.3 % (anterior); TR, 4.6 %; middle TR, 2.7 % and TH, 3.8 %. CONCLUSIONS: The effects on vBMD of annual infusion of 5 mg of zoledronic acid are site-specific and dominated by trabecular changes.
Authors: K L Bell; N Loveridge; J Power; N Garrahan; M Stanton; M Lunt; B F Meggitt; J Reeve Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Dennis M Black; John P Bilezikian; Kristine E Ensrud; Susan L Greenspan; Lisa Palermo; Trisha Hue; Thomas F Lang; Joan A McGowan; Clifford J Rosen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-08-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dennis M Black; Pierre D Delmas; Richard Eastell; Ian R Reid; Steven Boonen; Jane A Cauley; Felicia Cosman; Péter Lakatos; Ping Chung Leung; Zulema Man; Carlos Mautalen; Peter Mesenbrink; Huilin Hu; John Caminis; Karen Tong; Theresa Rosario-Jansen; Joel Krasnow; Trisha F Hue; Deborah Sellmeyer; Erik Fink Eriksen; Steven R Cummings Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dennis M Black; Susan L Greenspan; Kristine E Ensrud; Lisa Palermo; Joan A McGowan; Thomas F Lang; Patrick Garnero; Mary L Bouxsein; John P Bilezikian; Clifford J Rosen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C David L Thomas; Paul M Mayhew; Jon Power; Kenneth Es Poole; Nigel Loveridge; John G Clement; Chris J Burgoyne; Jonathan Reeve Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Michael R McClung; Jose R Zanchetta; Arne Høiseth; David L Kendler; Chui Kin Yuen; Jacques P Brown; Sigitas Stonkus; Stefan Goemaere; Chris Recknor; Grattan C Woodson; Michael A Bolognese; Edward Franek; Maria Luisa Brandi; Andrea Wang; Cesar Libanati Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Chamith S Rajapakse; Alexander R Farid; Daniel C Kargilis; Brandon C Jones; Jae S Lee; Alyssa J Johncola; Alexandra S Batzdorf; Snehal S Shetye; Michael W Hast; Gregory Chang Journal: Bone Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Cheng Li; Dakai Jin; Cheng Chen; Elena M Letuchy; Kathleen F Janz; Trudy L Burns; James C Torner; Steven M Levy; Punam K Saha Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: O Museyko; A Heinemann; M Krause; B Wulff; M Amling; K Püschel; C C Glüer; W Kalender; K Engelke Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 4.507