Literature DB >> 9893072

Structure of the femoral neck in hip fracture: cortical bone loss in the inferoanterior to superoposterior axis.

K L Bell1, N Loveridge, J Power, N Garrahan, M Stanton, M Lunt, B F Meggitt, J Reeve.   

Abstract

Although bone mass is a contributory risk factor for hip fracture, its distribution about the femoral neck is also important. Femoral neck biopsies were obtained from 13 females with intracapsular hip fracture (fracture: mean age 74.3 +/- 2.3 years [SEM]) and 19 cadaveric samples (control: 9 males and 10 females 79.4 +/- 1.7 years) and the areas of cortical and cancellous bone were quantitated in octants. In the control group, although males had larger bones than females, the proportions of cortical and cancellous bone were not different (p > 0.05) between the genders. The total amount of bone, as a proportion of bone + marrow, was significantly reduced in the fractures compared with the female controls (%Tt.Ar: fracture 27.83 +/- 1.18, female control 33.62 +/- 1.47; p = 0.0054). Reductions in cortical bone area occurred in all regions but particularly in the inferior, inferoanterior, and anterior octants (p < 0.05). There were no differences between cases and controls in the regional amount of cancellous bone (all regions, p > 0.178). Marked reductions in mean cortical bone width between the fracture and female control group occurred in the anterior, inferoanterior (31%), and superoposterior (25%) regions. Representing cortical widths as simple Fourier functions of the angle about the center of area (R2adj = 0.79) showed in the cases that there was preservation of the cortical bone in the inferior region, with the proportional loss of cortical bone being greatest in the inferoanterior and superoposterior regions. It is concluded that loss of cortical, rather than cancellous, bone predominates in cases of femoral neck fracture. This loss occurs primarily along the inferoanterior to superoposterior axis. As this axis bears the greatest strain during a fall, it is hypothesized that specific thinning of the cortex in these regions leads to an exaggerated propensity to fracture in those so affected, above that resulting from an equivalent general decrease in bone mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9893072     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.1.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  62 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  L G Raisz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Potential clinical relevance of digital radiogrammetry for quantification of periarticular bone demineralization in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis depending on severity and compared with DXA.

Authors:  J Böttcher; A Malich; A Pfeil; A Petrovitch; G Lehmann; J P Heyne; G Hein; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Variations in morphological and biomechanical indices at the distal radius in subjects with identical BMD.

Authors:  Galateia J Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Regional variation of intracortical porosity in the midshaft of the human femur: age and sex differences.

Authors:  C David L Thomas; Sophie A Feik; John G Clement
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; P M de Bakker; D Liu; S Kontulainen; P Guy; T R Oxland; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity.

Authors:  K M Kim; J K Brown; K J Kim; H S Choi; H N Kim; Y Rhee; S-K Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Two new regions of interest to evaluate separately cortical and trabecular BMD in the proximal femur using DXA.

Authors:  Sven Prevrhal; Margarita Meta; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Increased cancellous bone in the femoral neck of patients with coxarthrosis (hip osteoarthritis): a positive remodeling imbalance favoring bone formation.

Authors:  G R Jordan; N Loveridge; J Power; M T Clarke; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.