Literature DB >> 7492864

Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: implications for osteoporotic fracture.

J C Lotz1, E J Cheal, W C Hayes.   

Abstract

The rates of fracture at sites with different relative amounts of cortical and trabecular bone (hip, spine, distal radius) have been used to make inferences about the pathomechanics of bone loss and the existence of type I and type II osteoporosis. However, fracture risk is directly related to the ratio of tissue stress to tissue strength, which in turn is dependent not only on tissue composition but also tissue geometry and the direction and magnitude of loading. These three elements determine how the load is distributed within the tissue. As a result, assumptions on the relative structural importance of cortical and trabecular bone, and how these tissues are affected by bone loss, can be inaccurate if based on regional tissue composition and bone density alone. To investigate the structural significance of cortical and trabecular bone in the proximal femur, and how it is affected by bone loss, we determined the stress distributions in a normal and osteoporotic femur resulting from loadings representing: (1) gait; and (2) a fall to the side with impact onto the greater trochanter. A three-dimensional finite element model was generated based on a representative femur selected from a large database of femoral geometries. Stresses were analyzed throughout the femoral neck and intertrochanteric regions. We found that the percentage of total load supported by cortical and trabecular bone was approximately constant for all load cases but differed depending on location. Cortical bone carried 30% of the load at the subcapital region, 50% at the mid-neck, 96% at the base of the neck and 80% at the intertrochanteric region. These values differ from the widely held assumption that cortical bone carries 75% of the load in the femoral neck and 50% of the load at the intertrochanteric region. During gait, the principal stresses were concentrated within the primary compressive system of trabeculae and in the cortical bone of the intertrochanteric region. In contrast, during a fall, the trabecular stresses were concentrated within the primary tensile system of trabeculae with a peak magnitude 4.3 times that present during gait. While the distribution of stress for the osteoporotic femur was similar to the normal, the magnitude of peak stress was increased by between 33% and 45%. These data call into question several assumptions which serve as the basis for theories on the pathomechanics of osteoporosis. In addition, we expect that the insight provided by this analysis will result in the improved development and interpretation of non-invasive techniques for the quantification of in vivo hip fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7492864     DOI: 10.1007/bf01774015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  38 in total

1.  Hip fractures; the role of muscle contraction or intrinsic forces in the causation of fractures of the femoral neck.

Authors:  L D SMITH
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1953-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density.

Authors:  J C Rice; S C Cowin; J A Bowman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The mechanical properties of bone in osteoporosis.

Authors:  R P Dickenson; W C Hutton; J R Stott
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981-08

4.  An evaluation of the approaches of optimization models in the prediction of muscle forces during human gait.

Authors:  A G Patriarco; R W Mann; S R Simon; J M Mansour
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur.

Authors:  T D Brown; A B Ferguson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1980-06

6.  Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall.

Authors:  W C Hayes; E R Myers; J N Morris; T N Gerhart; H S Yett; L A Lipsitz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Bone age, mineral density, and fatigue damage.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; E Seeman; K P Offord; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K A Johnson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Epidemiology of hip fractures in Göteborg, Sweden, 1940-1983.

Authors:  C Zetterberg; S Elmerson; G B Andersson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The association of age, race, and sex with the location of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  R Y Hinton; G S Smith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  59 in total

1.  Evidence of a hypermineralised calcified fibrocartilage on the human femoral neck and lesser trochanter.

Authors:  J E Shea; E G Vajda; R D Bloebaum
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Age-specific reference values of hip geometric indices from a representative sample of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.

Authors:  M Iki; N DongMei; J Tamaki; Y Sato; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral neck both contribute to proximal femur failure load prediction.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; D M L Cooper; S Kontulainen; P Guy; B B Forster; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Targeted exercises against hip fragility.

Authors:  R Nikander; P Kannus; P Dastidar; M Hannula; L Harrison; T Cervinka; N G Narra; R Aktour; T Arola; H Eskola; S Soimakallio; A Heinonen; J Hyttinen; H Sievänen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Age-and region-dependent changes in three-dimensional microstructural properties of proximal femoral trabeculae.

Authors:  W-Q Cui; Y-Y Won; M-H Baek; D-H Lee; Y-S Chung; J-H Hur; Y-Z Ma
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Reduced Sirtuin1 expression at the femoral neck in women who sustained an osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  M El-Haj; I Gurt; E Cohen-Kfir; V Dixit; H Artsi; L Kandel; O Yakubovsky; O Safran; R Dresner-Pollak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Effects of hip abductor muscle forces and knee boundary conditions on femoral neck stresses during simulated falls.

Authors:  W J Choi; P A Cripton; S N Robinovitch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effects of a multi-component exercise program and calcium-vitamin-D3-fortified milk on bone mineral density in older men: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S Kukuljan; C A Nowson; S L Bass; K Sanders; G C Nicholson; M J Seibel; J Salmon; R M Daly
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  In vivo microdamage is an indicator of susceptibility to initiation and propagation of microdamage in human femoral trabecular bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Anthony J Laneve; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.