Literature DB >> 12557971

Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions.

Sven Prevrhal1, Julia C Fox, John A Shepherd, Harry K Genant.   

Abstract

Measurement of the width of thin structures such as the cortical shell of the vertebral body or femoral neck with computed tomography (CT) is limited by the spatial resolution of the CT system. Limited spatial resolution exists both within the CT image plane and perpendicular to it and can be described by the in-plane point spread function (PSF) and the across-plane slice sensitivity profile (SSP), respectively. The goal of this study was to confirm that errors of thickness measurement of thin structures critically depend on the spatial positioning of the object and the spatial resolution limitations of CT in all three dimensions, and to assess the size of the errors themselves. We compared computer models that incorporated both effects to experimentally assessed cortical thicknesses of the European Spine Phantom. Analysis included varying CT slice width, the orientation of measurement and angle beta of misalignment of longitudinal scanner and phantom axes. Agreement of models with measurements was good in all configurations with an overall error of 0.17 mm. This showed that PSF and SSP are adequate system characteristics to predict deviation of measured values from true widths. Errors between measurements and true cortical thickness values delta(true) averaged to 1.5 mm were strongly positively correlated with slice width d and beta. When the across-plane partial volume effect was eliminated, limited in-plane resolution still accounted for overestimation of delta(true) by 0.68 (137%), 0.27 (27%), and 0.06 mm (4%) for delta(true)=0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm, respectively. For delta(true) of 1.0 mm and above, it was shown that although the absolute cortical thickness values might not be accurately measurable, relative differences between two values are reflected in measurement. Implications for cortical thickness measurement are that the spinal cortical shell is too thin, whereas accurate assessment at locations of the femoral neck exhibiting a thicker cortical shell of both difference and absolute values should be possible with CT even for larger misalignment angles, especially when a smaller CT slice width is chosen.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12557971     DOI: 10.1118/1.1521940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  36 in total

Review 1.  Measuring the structural strength of bones with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: principles, technical limitations, and future possibilities.

Authors:  Thomas Beck
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Application of CT-PSF-based computer-simulated lung nodules for evaluating the accuracy of computer-aided volumetry.

Authors:  Ayumu Funaki; Masaki Ohkubo; Shinichi Wada; Kohei Murao; Toru Matsumoto; Shinji Niizuma
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-03-25

3.  Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis.

Authors:  Wenjun Li; Miki Sode; Isra Saeed; Thomas Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Imaging of small spherical structures in CT: simulation study using measured point spread function.

Authors:  Masaki Ohkubo; Shinichi Wada; Masayuki Kunii; Toru Matsumoto; Kanae Nishizawa
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Data management solution for large-volume computed tomography in an existing picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

Authors:  Takashi Yoshinobu; Katsumi Abe; Yasuo Sasaki; Makiko Tabei; Seiji Tanaka; Motoichiro Takahashi; Satoru Furuhashi; Ikue Tanaka; Takashi Shizukuishi; Takuya Aizawa; Toshiya Maebayashi; Masakuni Sakaguchi; Yoshitaka Okuhata; Junko Kikuta; Naoya Ishibashi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  A method for evaluating the performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in lung cancer CT screening: detection limit for nodule size and density.

Authors:  Hajime Kobayashi; Masaki Ohkubo; Akihiro Narita; Janaka C Marasinghe; Kohei Murao; Toru Matsumoto; Shusuke Sone; Shinichi Wada
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Assessing fracture risk using gradient boosting machine (GBM) models.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Atkinson; Terry M Therneau; L Joseph Melton; Jon J Camp; Sara J Achenbach; Shreyasee Amin; Sundeep Khosta
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Comprehensive assessment of the slice sensitivity profiles in breast tomosynthesis and breast CT.

Authors:  Anita Nosratieh; Kai Yang; Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data.

Authors:  G M Treece; A H Gee; P M Mayhew; K E S Poole
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.