Literature DB >> 23121710

Infants' perception of chasing.

Willem E Frankenhuis1, Bailey House, H Clark Barrett, Scott P Johnson.   

Abstract

Two significant questions in cognitive and developmental science are first, whether objects and events are selected for attention based on their features (featural processing) or the configuration of their features (configural processing), and second, how these modes of processing develop. These questions have been addressed in part with experiments focused on infants' perception of faces, human body shapes, and biological motion of individual agents. Here, we investigate 4- and 10-month-old infants' (N=192) attention to social motions, specifically to chasing-a ubiquitous, ancient, and fitness-relevant mode of interaction. We constructed computer-generated animations of chasing that had three properties: acceleration, high turning rates, and attraction ("heat-seeking"). In the first experiment we showed chasing side-by-side with a control display of inanimate, billiard-ball-like motions. Infants strongly preferred attending to chasing. In the next three studies, we systematically investigated the effect of each property in turn (acceleration, turning, and attraction) by showing a display of that property side-by-side with the control display. Infants preferentially attended to acceleration, and to attraction, but not to turning. If infants preferred chasing for its configuration, then the sum of the effect sizes of individual properties should be smaller than their combined effects. That is not what we found: instead, on three measures of visual behavior, the summed effects of individual properties equaled (or exceeded) that of chasing. Moreover, although attraction drew little attention and turning no attention at all, acceleration drew (nearly) as much attention as chasing. Our results thus provide evidence that infants preferred chasing because of its features, not its configuration.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23121710      PMCID: PMC3529835          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  30 in total

1.  Perceptual causality and animacy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Development of visual perception.

Authors:  Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-22

3.  Balancing sampling and specialization: an adaptationist model of incremental development.

Authors:  Willem E Frankenhuis; Karthik Panchanathan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 5.  Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction.

Authors:  D H Rakison; D Poulin-Dubois
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Visual perception of intentional motion.

Authors:  W H Dittrich; S E Lea
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Actual and illusory differences in constant speed influence the perception of animacy similarly.

Authors:  Paul A Szego; M D Rutherford
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Development of preferences for the human body shape in infancy.

Authors:  Virginia Slaughter; Michelle Heron; Susan Sim
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-10

9.  Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: a preliminary theoretical statement.

Authors:  G Turkewitz; P A Kenny
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.038

10.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise.

Authors:  Joshua New; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  15 in total

1.  Infant perception of sex differences in biological motion displays.

Authors:  Tawny Tsang; Marissa Ogren; Yujia Peng; Bryan Nguyen; Kerri L Johnson; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-09

Review 2.  Life is in motion (through a chick's eye).

Authors:  Bastien S Lemaire; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Oxytocin shapes parental motion during father-infant interaction.

Authors:  Omri Weisman; Emilie Delaherche; Margot Rondeau; Mohamed Chetouani; David Cohen; Ruth Feldman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Children's Perception of Animacy: Social Attributions to Moving Figures.

Authors:  Ruth Hofrichter; Megan E Mueller; M D Rutherford
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The neural basis of non-verbal communication-enhanced processing of perceived give-me gestures in 9-month-old girls.

Authors:  Marta Bakker; Katharina Kaduk; Claudia Elsner; Joshua Juvrud
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-06

6.  Goal attribution to inanimate moving objects by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).

Authors:  Takeshi Atsumi; Hiroki Koda; Nobuo Masataka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Infants' identification of gender in biological motion displays.

Authors:  Scott P Johnson; Mingfei Dong; Marissa Ogren; Damla Senturk
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2021-05-27

8.  Social Eavesdropping in Zebrafish: Tuning of Attention to Social Interactions.

Authors:  Rodrigo Abril-de-Abreu; José Cruz; Rui F Oliveira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Peer attachment formation by systemic redox regulation with social training after a sensitive period.

Authors:  Mamiko Koshiba; Genta Karino; Aya Senoo; Koki Mimura; Yuka Shirakawa; Yuta Fukushima; Saya Obara; Hitomi Sekihara; Shimpei Ozawa; Kentaro Ikegami; Toyotoshi Ueda; Hideo Yamanouchi; Shun Nakamura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Attentional capture by social stimuli in young infants.

Authors:  Maxie Gluckman; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.