Literature DB >> 36222937

Life is in motion (through a chick's eye).

Bastien S Lemaire1, Giorgio Vallortigara2.   

Abstract

Cognitive scientists, social psychologists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, ethologists and many others have all wondered how brains detect and interpret the motion of living organisms. It appears that specific cues, incorporated into our brains by natural selection, serve to signal the presence of living organisms. A simple geometric figure such as a triangle put in motion with specific kinematic rules can look alive, and it can even seem to have intentions and goals. In this article, we survey decades of parallel investigations on the motion cues that drive animacy perception-the sensation that something is alive-in non-human animals, especially in precocial species, such as the domestic chick, to identify inborn biological predispositions. At the same time, we highlight the relevance of these studies for an understanding of human typical and atypical cognitive development.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Domestic chicks; Human newborns; Motion perception; animacy; predispositions

Year:  2022        PMID: 36222937     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01703-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   2.899


  78 in total

1.  Development of motion processing in children with autism.

Authors:  Dagmara Annaz; Anna Remington; Elizabeth Milne; Mike Coleman; Ruth Campbell; Michael S C Thomas; John Swettenham
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-11

2.  Perception of chasing in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).

Authors:  Takeshi Atsumi; Yasuo Nagasaka
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion.

Authors:  E Bonda; M Petrides; D Ostry; A Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Amygdalo-cortical projections in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  D G Amaral; J L Price
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-12-20       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Cortical route for facelike pattern processing in human newborns.

Authors:  Marco Buiatti; Elisa Di Giorgio; Manuela Piazza; Carlo Polloni; Giuseppe Menna; Fabrizio Taddei; Ermanno Baldo; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain.

Authors:  S-J Blakemore; P Boyer; M Pachot-Clouard; A Meltzoff; C Segebarth; J Decety
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Cortical and subcortical afferents to the amygdala of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J P Aggleton; M J Burton; R E Passingham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-05-26       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Animacy perception in dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans (Homo sapiens): Comparison may be perturbed by inherent differences in looking patterns.

Authors:  Judit Abdai; Bence Ferdinandy; Attila Lengyel; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Novel approach to study the perception of animacy in dogs.

Authors:  Judit Abdai; Cristina Baño Terencio; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Selection for specific behavioural traits does not influence preference of chasing motion and visual strategy in dogs.

Authors:  Judit Abdai; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.