Literature DB >> 17909181

Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise.

Joshua New1, Leda Cosmides, John Tooby.   

Abstract

Visual attention mechanisms are known to select information to process based on current goals, personal relevance, and lower-level features. Here we present evidence that human visual attention also includes a high-level category-specialized system that monitors animals in an ongoing manner. Exposed to alternations between complex natural scenes and duplicates with a single change (a change-detection paradigm), subjects are substantially faster and more accurate at detecting changes in animals relative to changes in all tested categories of inanimate objects, even vehicles, which they have been trained for years to monitor for sudden life-or-death changes in trajectory. This animate monitoring bias could not be accounted for by differences in lower-level visual characteristics, how interesting the target objects were, experience, or expertise, implicating mechanisms that evolved to direct attention differentially to objects by virtue of their membership in ancestrally important categories, regardless of their current utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909181      PMCID: PMC2034212          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703913104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Changing faces: a detection advantage in the flicker paradigm.

Authors:  T Ro; C Russell; N Lavie
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

2.  Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion.

Authors:  Z Kourtzi; N Kanwisher
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search.

Authors:  M Turatto; G Galfano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention.

Authors:  S R Langton; V Bruce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or representational momentum.

Authors:  C Senior; J Barnes; V Giampietro; A Simmons; E T Bullmore; M Brammer; A S David
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  What controls attention in natural environments?

Authors:  H Shinoda; M M Hayhoe; A Shrivastava
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention.

Authors:  Fei Fei Li; Rufin VanRullen; Christof Koch; Pietro Perona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention.

Authors:  Derrick Parkhurst; Klinton Law; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.

Authors:  M M Chun; Y Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects.

Authors:  R VanRullen; S J Thorpe
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  107 in total

1.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

2.  Explicit semantic stimulus categorization interferes with implicit emotion processing.

Authors:  Harald T Schupp; Ralf Schmälzle; Tobias Flaisch
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Human Actions Support Infant Memory.

Authors:  Lauren H Howard; Amanda L Woodward
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2019-10-17

4.  Fear reactions to snakes in naïve mouse lemurs and pig-tailed macaques.

Authors:  Lucie Weiss; Pavel Brandl; Daniel Frynta
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Spontaneous resting-state BOLD fluctuations reveal persistent domain-specific neural networks.

Authors:  W Kyle Simmons; Alex Martin
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  The Conundrum of Modern Art : Prestige-Driven Coevolutionary Aesthetics Trumps Evolutionary Aesthetics among Art Experts.

Authors:  Jan Verpooten; Siegfried Dewitte
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

7.  Adaptive memory: Animacy, threat, and attention in free recall.

Authors:  Juliana K Leding
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

8.  Natural forces as agents: reconceptualizing the animate-inanimate distinction.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

9.  Distinct brain activity in processing negative pictures of animals and objects - the role of human contexts.

Authors:  Zhijun Cao; Yanbing Zhao; Tengteng Tan; Gang Chen; Xueling Ning; Lexia Zhan; Jiongjiong Yang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Visual search efficiency is greater for human faces compared to animal faces.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Haley L Husband; Krysten Yee; Alison Fullerton; Krisztina V Jakobsen
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.