Literature DB >> 17997647

Actual and illusory differences in constant speed influence the perception of animacy similarly.

Paul A Szego1, M D Rutherford.   

Abstract

The ability to perceive objects as alive is the first step in social cognition. When the status of an object is ambiguous--if far away or fast moving--animacy is best perceived using motion cues. Previous studies have revealed that acceleration is a robust cue to animacy. The current study tests the prediction that, in the absence of acceleration, an object traveling at a relatively faster constant speed is more likely to be perceived as animate. Experiment 1 confirmed this hypothesis. Experiment 2 investigated the robustness of this finding by employing an illusory speed difference: Participants viewed dots moving at the same speed across apparently smaller and apparently larger central circles that were actually equally sized. Two thirds of participants perceived a dot traveling across an apparently larger circle to be faster or alive. Experiment 3 showed that participants' responses were not due to response bias. Together, these results suggest that our perceptions of animacy are influenced by constant speed differences, and that the perceptual association of speed and animacy is influenced by actual and illusory speed differences similarly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997647     DOI: 10.1167/7.12.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  Intention perception in high functioning people with Autism Spectrum Disorders using animacy displays derived from human actions.

Authors:  Phil McAleer; Jim W Kay; Frank E Pollick; M D Rutherford
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-08

2.  Infants' perception of chasing.

Authors:  Willem E Frankenhuis; Bailey House; H Clark Barrett; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-10-31

3.  Children's Perception of Animacy: Social Attributions to Moving Figures.

Authors:  Ruth Hofrichter; Megan E Mueller; M D Rutherford
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Speed Overestimation of the Moving Away Object in the Intentional Reaction Causal Effect.

Authors:  Giulia Parovel; Stefano Guidi
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-12-26

5.  No evidence of spontaneous preference for slowly moving objects in visually naïve chicks.

Authors:  Bastien S Lemaire
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.