Literature DB >> 29807312

Infant perception of sex differences in biological motion displays.

Tawny Tsang1, Marissa Ogren1, Yujia Peng1, Bryan Nguyen1, Kerri L Johnson1, Scott P Johnson2.   

Abstract

We examined mechanisms underlying infants' ability to categorize human biological motion stimuli from sex-typed walk motions, focusing on how visual attention to dynamic information in point-light displays (PLDs) contributes to infants' social category formation. We tested for categorization of PLDs produced by women and men by habituating infants to a series of female or male walk motions and then recording posthabituation preferences for new PLDs from the familiar or novel category (Experiment 1). We also tested for intrinsic preferences for female or male walk motions (Experiment 2). We found that infant boys were better able to categorize PLDs than were girls and that male PLDs were preferred overall. Neither of these effects was found to change with development across the observed age range (∼4-18 months). We conclude that infants' categorization of walk motions in PLDs is constrained by intrinsic preferences for higher motion speeds and higher spans of motion and, relatedly, by differences in walk motions produced by men and women.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological motion perception; Motion processing; Preferences; Sex differences; Social categorization; Visual social attention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29807312      PMCID: PMC5986598          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  61 in total

1.  On perceptual readiness.

Authors:  J S BRUNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Biological motion preference in humans at birth: role of dynamic and configural properties.

Authors:  Lara Bardi; Lucia Regolin; Francesca Simion
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-03

3.  Gender recognition from point-light walkers.

Authors:  Frank E Pollick; Jim W Kay; Katrin Heim; Rebecca Stringer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  More Than Meets the Eye: Split-Second Social Perception.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Kerri L Johnson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Development of visual preference for own- versus other-race faces in infancy.

Authors:  Shaoying Liu; Wen Sara Xiao; Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Yueyan Zhang; Hui Chen; Liezhong Ge; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2015-02-09

Review 6.  Sex differences in the human visual system.

Authors:  John E Vanston; Lars Strother
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Infants' perception of emotion from body movements.

Authors:  Nicole Zieber; Ashley Kangas; Alyson Hock; Ramesh S Bhatt
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-06-26

8.  Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception.

Authors:  J R Pomerantz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1983-12

9.  The development of infant sensitivity to biomechanical motions.

Authors:  B I Bertenthal; D R Proffitt; N B Spetner; M A Thomas
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1985-06

10.  Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants.

Authors:  P C Quinn; P D Eimas; S L Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  2 in total

1.  Motion or emotion: Infants discriminate emotional biological motion based on low-level visual information.

Authors:  Marissa Ogren; Brianna Kaplan; Yujia Peng; Kerri L Johnson; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2019-05-18

2.  Infants' identification of gender in biological motion displays.

Authors:  Scott P Johnson; Mingfei Dong; Marissa Ogren; Damla Senturk
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2021-05-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.