Literature DB >> 23108683

Does the severity of preoperative varus deformity influence postoperative alignment in both conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty?

Dae Kyung Bae1, Sang Jun Song, Dong Beom Heo, Dae Hyun Tak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The postoperative alignment was compared according to the severity of preoperative varus deformity in computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty (CAS-TKA).
METHODS: The study reviewed 127 consecutive CAS-TKA and 236 conventional TKA, retrospectively. In CAS-TKA, 77 knees with a varus deformity ≤15.0° were classified in group CAS-A and 50 knees with a varus deformity >15.0° were classified in group CAS-B. In conventional groups, 204 knees with a varus deformity ≤15.0 were classified in group Conventional-A and 32 knees with a varus deformity >15.0° were classified in group Conventional-B. The postoperative mechanical axis (MA) was compared among groups CAS-A, CAS-B, Conventional-A and Conventional-B.
RESULTS: The average postoperative MA was 0.7° varus in group CAS-A, 2.8° varus in group CAS-B, 1.1° varus in group Conventional-A and 3.2° varus in group Conventional-B (p < 0.001). The postoperative MA was within 3° in 81.8, 62.0, 58.8 and 37.5 % of group CAS-A, CAS-B, Conventional-A and Conventional-B, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The severity of preoperative varus deformity influences postoperative alignment despite using CAS. More careful correction of the alignment is required, especially in TKA performed on patients with a greater varus deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23108683     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2263-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  33 in total

1.  Novel approach to reducing discrepancies in radiographic and navigational limb alignments in computer-assisted TKA.

Authors:  Byung June Chung; Isaac Dileep; Chong Bum Chang; Yeon Gwi Kang; Yong Bum Park; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Computerized tomography scout view for determining distal femoral resection angle in intramedullary instrumentation of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Murad Uslu; Baris Ozsar; Meric Cirpar; Simay Kara; Fatih Eksioglu; Ozgur Cetik
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice.

Authors:  W P Yau; K Y Chiu; J L Zuo; W M Tang; T P Ng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Seiji Kubo; Atsushi Kitagawa; Takaaki Chin; Tetsuhiro Iguchi; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies.

Authors:  J Y Lazennec; M A Rousseau; A Rangel; M Gorin; C Belicourt; A Brusson; Y Catonné
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Radiographic measures of knee alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: effect of weightbearing status and associations with dynamic joint load.

Authors:  Adrian V Specogna; Trevor B Birmingham; Michael A Hunt; Ian C Jones; Thomas R Jenkyn; Peter J Fowler; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty in knees with osteoarthritis due to extra-articular deformity.

Authors:  Fabio Catani; Vitantonio Digennaro; Andrea Ensini; Alberto Leardini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: a comparison of tourniquet time, blood loss and length of stay.

Authors:  Sanil H Ajwani; Morgan Jones; Jeremy W Jarratt; Gordon J Shepard; William G Ryan
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Total knee arthroplasty with use of computer-assisted navigation compared with conventional guiding systems in the same patient: radiographic results in Asian patients.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Huang; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Kuo-Ti Peng; Robert Wen-Wei Hsu; Yi-Jan Weng; Wun-Jer Shen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Luigi Molfetta; Davide Caldo
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Shorter survival rate in varus-aligned knees after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hai-Xiao Liu; Ping Shang; Xiao-Zhou Ying; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Alignment in knee flexion position during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jae-Hyuk Yang; Anshul Dahuja; Jin-Kak Kim; Se-Hyeok Yun; Jung-Ro Yoon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Case-related factors affecting cutting errors of the proximal tibia in total knee arthroplasty assessed by computer navigation.

Authors:  Tadashi Tsukeoka; Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi; Kensuke Yoshino; Mashiko Suzuki
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Risk factors for tibial implant malpositioning in total knee arthrosplasty-consecutive series of one thousand, four hundred and seventeen cases.

Authors:  Romain Gaillard; Simone Cerciello; Sebastien Lustig; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Registration of Proximal Tibial Centre May Need to be Selectively Lateralized to Avoid Coronal Malalignment in Digitally-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arun Mullaji
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  Does patella position influence ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jung-Ro Yoon; Kwang-Jun Oh; Joon Ho Wang; Jae-Hyuk Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Preoperative Measurement of Tibial Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Accuracy of Postoperative Limb Alignment Restoration.

Authors:  Pei-Hui Wu; Zhi-Qi Zhang; Shu-Ying Fang; Zi-Bo Yang; Yan Kang; Ming Fu; Wei-Ming Liao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Selective medial soft tissue release combined with tibial reduction osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Qian Tang; Hua-Chen Yu; Ping Shang; Shang-Kun Tang; Hua-Zi Xu; Hai-Xiao Liu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.