Literature DB >> 18259827

Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice.

W P Yau1, K Y Chiu, J L Zuo, W M Tang, T P Ng.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Postoperative alignment of the implanted prosthesis in computer-navigated TKA has been reported to be superior to that using the conventional technique. There is an assumption that use of computer navigation techniques can make an inexperienced or occasional TKA surgeon perform more like an expert TKA surgeon. To assess improved accuracy in recreation of mechanical alignment in TKA performed using computer navigation, a retrospective review of the experience of one of the authors (WPY) before and after using computer navigation was performed. We reviewed the radiographic results of 104 TKAs (52 computer navigation, 52 conventional technique) and found the accuracy of postoperative radiographic alignment of the implanted prosthesis was not improved by using computer navigation as judged by (1) overall limb alignment (case: varus 1.3 degrees ; control: varus 0.3 degrees ); (2) femoral component alignment (case: 90.3 degrees ; control: 90.3 degrees ); and (3) tibial component alignment (case: 89 degrees ; control: 90 degrees ). Significant factors that affected postoperative overall mechanical alignment in the current navigation series included severity of the preoperative deformity, amount of error in making bone cuts, and experience of the surgeon in using the computer navigation system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18259827      PMCID: PMC2504660          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0144-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  34 in total

1.  Early failures in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T K Fehring; S Odum; W L Griffin; J B Mason; M Nadaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  M Sparmann; B Wolke; H Czupalla; D Banzer; A Zink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-08

3.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial.

Authors:  S K Chauhan; R G Scott; W Breidahl; R J Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

4.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

5.  Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Masahiro Kurosaka; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Ryosuke Kuroda; Katsuhiko Ishimoto; Kazuo Tsujimoto; Ryoichi Shiba; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bernd Stöckl; Michael Nogler; Rafal Rosiek; Martin Fischer; Martin Krismer; Oliver Kessler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Improving tibial component coronal alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of a tibial planing device.

Authors:  Shantanu Patil; Darryl D D'Lima; James M Fait; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation.

Authors:  R Hart; M Janecek; A Chaker; P Bucek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Doerte Krocker; Ulrike Weiss; Stephan Tohtz; Carsten Perka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?

Authors:  Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack; Richard H Rothman; Shani Shastri; Sidney M Jacoby
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  22 in total

1.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of custom cutting guides based on three-dimensional computerized CT-scan planning and a conventional ancillary system based on two-dimensional planning in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Charles Kajetanek; Yves Catonné
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Lee; Jong-Hoon Park; Dong-Ik Song; Debabrata Padhy; Woong-Kyo Jeong; Seung-Beom Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Relationship between cutting errors and learning curve in computer-assisted total knee replacement.

Authors:  Alfonso Manzotti; Pietro Cerveri; Elena De Momi; Chris Pullen; Norberto Confalonieri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  An alternative method to create extramedullary references in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jai-Gon Seo; Young-Wan Moon; Sang-Hoon Park; Jae-Woo Shim; Sang-Min Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Distal femur rotation relates to joint obliquity in ACL-deficient Chinese.

Authors:  W P Yau; K Y Chiu; August W M Fok; C H Yan; F Y Ng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does the severity of preoperative varus deformity influence postoperative alignment in both conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Dong Beom Heo; Dae Hyun Tak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  [Computer-assisted systems in total knee arthroplasty. Useful aid or only additional costs].

Authors:  T Calliess; M Ettinger; H Windhagen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Accuracy of image-free navigation for severely deformed knees.

Authors:  Minoru Takasaki; Shuichi Matsuda; Shingo Fukagawa; Hiroaki Mitsuyasu; Hiromasa Miura; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Tibial stress fracture after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F Massai; F Conteduca; A Vadalà; R Iorio; L Basiglini; A Ferretti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.