Literature DB >> 21800169

Navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty in knees with osteoarthritis due to extra-articular deformity.

Fabio Catani1, Vitantonio Digennaro, Andrea Ensini, Alberto Leardini, Sandro Giannini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Extra-articular post-traumatic deformity may make difficult the implantation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Staged surgical procedures, including femoral or tibial osteotomy, can be required to restore proper alignment. These procedures may be inappropriate because of high rate of complications. Intra-articular resection is an alternative procedure, but it is limited by the potential compromise of collateral knee ligaments. Conventional instrumentation cannot be used in patients with previous trauma and residual bone deformity. We want to assess whether computer-assisted surgery may be a good alternative to traditional techniques.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive TKAs were performed in 20 patients (12 men and 8 women) with knee arthritis due to extra-articular deformity. The mean age was 52 years. According to Moreland method, the mean (± standard deviation) of the pre-operative hip-knee-ankle angle was 10.4° ± 8.3° in varus. In all cases, an image-free knee navigation system was used because of the severe deformity or the presence of retained hardware that prevented the use of the intramedullary rod. The average follow-up was 3.1 years.
RESULTS: One month after surgery, the mean hip-knee-ankle angle was 0.8° ± 1.2° in varus. At follow-up, the Knee Society Score increased from an average of 48 pre-operatively to 91 (P < 0.05) post-operatively, with over 90% of excellent and good results. Mean range of motion improved from a 7°-74° mean range pre-operatively to 0°-94° post-operatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The general value of navigation systems in achieving accurate bone cuts and restoring the mechanical axis has been established in the literature for standard TKA but not yet for extra-articular deformity. Our findings at mid-term follow-up on a large cohort of these patients showed that these systems used for intra-articular resection are a very effective alternative to previous techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective study, Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21800169     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1602-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

2.  Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Ensini; F Catani; A Leardini; M Romagnoli; S Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery?: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial.

Authors:  Y Kalairajah; A J Cossey; G M Verrall; G Ludbrook; A J Spriggins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

4.  Two year follow-up comparing computer assisted versus freehand TKR on joint stability, muscular function and patients satisfaction.

Authors:  C Lüring; F Oczipka; L Perlick; M Tingart; J Grifka; H Bäthis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Navigation and CAS: is D-day approaching?

Authors:  Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.

Authors:  J R Moreland; L W Bassett; G J Hanker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  [Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies].

Authors:  H Bäthis; S Shafizadeh; T Paffrath; C Simanski; J Grifka; C Lüring
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  When computer-assisted knee replacement is the best alternative.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; J Bohannon Mason; Joseph Moskal; David C Pollock; John Mann; Vincent J Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Navigation-assisted minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty in patients with extra-articular femoral deformity.

Authors:  Kang-Il Kim; Alankar A Ramteke; Dae-Kyung Bae
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia.

Authors:  Gregg R Klein; Matthew S Austin; Eric B Smith; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  17 in total

1.  The limits of precision in conventionally instrumented computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R E da Assunção; N J Hancock; W J M Bruce; P Walker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Computer-assisted navigation for the intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy can avoid outliers compared with the conventional technique.

Authors:  Kilian Reising; Peter C Strohm; Oliver Hauschild; Hagen Schmal; Mohmed Khattab; Norbert P Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Computer Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does it Make a Difference?

Authors:  Emil G Haritinian; Ashvin L Pimpalnerkar
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2013-06

4.  Does the severity of preoperative varus deformity influence postoperative alignment in both conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Dong Beom Heo; Dae Hyun Tak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The dorsal pedis artery as a new distal landmark for extramedullary tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Natsuki Sugimura; Masahiko Ikeuchi; Masashi Izumi; Koji Aso; Takahiro Ushida; Toshikazu Tani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation.

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Raffaele Iorio; Daniele Mazza; Ludovico Caperna; Gabriele Bolle; Giuseppe Argento; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Toe-out angle changes after total knee arthroplasty in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Masayuki Tazawa; Makoto Sohmiya; Naoki Wada; Irma Ruslina Defi; Kenji Shirakura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  [Computer-assisted systems in total knee arthroplasty. Useful aid or only additional costs].

Authors:  T Calliess; M Ettinger; H Windhagen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Handheld computer-navigated constrained total knee arthroplasty for complex extra-articular deformities.

Authors:  M Pietsch; M Hochegger; O Djahani; G Mlaker; M Eder-Halbedl; Th Hofstädter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Accuracy of CT-based patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty in patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M G M Schotanus; E H van Haaren; R P M Hendrickx; E J P Jansen; N P Kort
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.