Literature DB >> 35547340

Registration of Proximal Tibial Centre May Need to be Selectively Lateralized to Avoid Coronal Malalignment in Digitally-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty.

Arun Mullaji1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Placement of prosthetic components and limb alignment can be adversely impacted by errors in identification of registration points in digitally assisted knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to trigonometrically analyze the impact on the accuracy of coronal tibial component and limb alignment of discrepancy between the registered midpoint of the proximal bony tibia vis-à-vis the radiographic medio-lateral center of the lateralized final tibial implant in certain varus-deformed knees.
Methods: We analyzed trigonometrically the angular difference θ in coronal alignment of tibial component and hip-knee-ankle angle resulting from lateral translation of the medio-lateral center of the final tibial implant, with respect to the initial registered midpoint of the proximal bony tibia. θ was calculated using the equation tan( θ ) = d/t, where d is the numerical distance between the registered point and the center of the final tibial tray position and t is the length of tibia distal to the resection.
Results: One degree of varus malpositioning of the tibial component and the limb can occur for every 6.3 mm of lateral translation of the tibial implant with respect to the midpoint of the proximal bony tibia of average reported length (372 mm). The magnitude of this error is inversely proportional to tibial length and the patient's height. Conclusions: Coronal malalignment of the tibial component and the limb is directly proportional to the amount of lateral translation of the tibial tray with respect to the registered midpoint of the proximal bony tibia and inversely proportional to the patient's height. This may occur in cases with tibial extra-articular deformity, those undergoing reduction osteotomy, downsizing of the tray, or inadvertently during tibial preparation. The error can be avoided by initial registration of the tibial midpoint more laterally by templating, re-registering the new center of the resected tibial surface or osteotomy for extra-articular deformity. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty; Malalignment; Robotic knee arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 35547340      PMCID: PMC9043048          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00601-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  19 in total

1.  Tibial shaft axis does not always serve as a correct coronal landmark in total knee arthroplasty for varus knees.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Hideki Mizu-uchi; Hiromasa Miura; Ryuji Nagamine; Ken Urabe; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

3.  The Inadequacy of Short Knee Radiographs in Evaluating Coronal Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Park; Jeffrey B Stambough; Ryan M Nunley; Robert L Barrack; Denis Nam
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements.

Authors:  Frederick W Werner; David C Ayers; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Tibial tray rotation and posterior slope increase risk for outliers in coronal alignment.

Authors:  Dominique P D'Lima; Philip Huang; Pichai Suryanarayan; Adam Rosen; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Tibial shaft anatomy differs between Caucasians and East Asian individuals.

Authors:  Hongyi Shao; Chilung Chen; Daniel Scholl; Ahmad Faizan; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Efficacy of Patient-Specific Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont; Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab; Peter Fennema
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty for arthritis with extra-articular deformity.

Authors:  Arun Mullaji; Gautam M Shetty
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation improve the accuracy of tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reha N Tandogan; Nanne P Kort; Ersin Ercin; Floris van Rooij; Luca Nover; Mo Saffarini; Michael T Hirschmann; Roland Becker; David Dejour
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.114

10.  Significant Incidence of Extra-Articular Tibia Vara Affects Radiological Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Balaji Saibaba; Mandeep S Dhillon; Devendra K Chouhan; Rajendra K Kanojia; Mahesh Prakash; Vikas Bachhal
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.