Literature DB >> 26936574

Nonlinear frequency compression: Influence of start frequency and input bandwidth on consonant and vowel recognition.

Joshua M Alexander1.   

Abstract

By varying parameters that control nonlinear frequency compression (NFC), this study examined how different ways of compressing inaudible mid- and/or high-frequency information at lower frequencies influences perception of consonants and vowels. Twenty-eight listeners with mild to moderately severe hearing loss identified consonants and vowels from nonsense syllables in noise following amplification via a hearing aid simulator. Low-pass filtering and the selection of NFC parameters fixed the output bandwidth at a frequency representing a moderately severe (3.3 kHz, group MS) or a mild-to-moderate (5.0 kHz, group MM) high-frequency loss. For each group (n = 14), effects of six combinations of NFC start frequency (SF) and input bandwidth [by varying the compression ratio (CR)] were examined. For both groups, the 1.6 kHz SF significantly reduced vowel and consonant recognition, especially as CR increased; whereas, recognition was generally unaffected if SF increased at the expense of a higher CR. Vowel recognition detriments for group MS were moderately correlated with the size of the second formant frequency shift following NFC. For both groups, significant improvement (33%-50%) with NFC was confined to final /s/ and /z/ and to some VCV tokens, perhaps because of listeners' limited exposure to each setting. No set of parameters simultaneously maximized recognition across all tokens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936574      PMCID: PMC4769266          DOI: 10.1121/1.4941916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech recognition and sound quality for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Steven C Marcrum; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Across- and within-consonant errors for isolated syllables in noise.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Jace Wolfe; Andrew John; Erin Schafer; Myriel Nyffeler; Michael Boretzki; Teresa Caraway
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and non-linear frequency compression for children with mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  Jace Wolfe; Andrew John; Erin Schafer; Mary Hudson; Michael Boretzki; Susan Scollie; Whitney Woods; Julie Wheeler; Krystal Hudgens; Sara Neumann
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.

Authors:  Chelsea Kimlinger; Ryan McCreery; Dawna Lewis
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Katie Masterson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review.

Authors:  Andrea Simpson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

8.  Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Brian R Glasberg; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Vowel space characteristics and vowel identification accuracy.

Authors:  Amy T Neel
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  11 in total

1.  Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.

Authors:  Melinda C Anderson; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  The Use of Frequency Lowering Technology in the Treatment of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: A Review of the Literature and Candidacy Considerations for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  Quantifying the Range of Signal Modification in Clinically Fit Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Varsha Rallapalli; Melinda Anderson; James Kates; Lauren Balmert; Lynn Sirow; Kathryn Arehart; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Perception of Medial Consonants by Children With and Without Speech and Language Disorders: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Françoise Brosseau-Lapré; Jennifer Schumaker; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Dawna Lewis; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Joshua M Alexander
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Quality ratings of frequency-compressed speech by participants with extensive high-frequency dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Judy G Kopun; Meredith Spratford; Clairissa M Mollak; Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Evaluation of a Frequency-Lowering Algorithm for Adults With High-Frequency Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 9.  Auditory perceptual efficacy of nonlinear frequency compression used in hearing aids: A review.

Authors:  Yitao Mao; Jing Yang; Emily Hahn; Li Xu
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-07-04

10.  Comparison of Frequency Transposition and Frequency Compression for People With Extensive Dead Regions in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Thomas Baer; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.