Literature DB >> 26676874

Is age a limiting factor for adaptation to cochlear implant?

Anne-Lise Hiel1,2, Jean-Marc Gerard3, Monique Decat4,5, Naïma Deggouj4,5.   

Abstract

The influence of age on adaptation to cochlear implant (CI) is still being contested in the literature. The aim of this study was twofold. First, hearing outcomes in quiet conditions were compared between CI users implanted over and under the age of 70 years. Second, the effect of the duration of auditory deprivation was investigated. The study design is a retrospective review and the setting is in academic tertiary referral center. One hundred and twenty-one postlingually deafened implanted adults participated in this study. Hearing outcomes were compared between 121 postlingually deafened adults implanted under 40, between 40 and 70, and over 70 years of age. Speech audiometry measurements were taken at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 60 months post-cochlear implantation (pCI), in quiet conditions only. Hearing outcomes were significantly better only at 1 year pCI in the youngest group compared to the two older groups. No significant difference was observed between the middle-aged and eldest subjects at any time. The influence of the severe-to-profound hearing loss (SPHL) duration was investigated and found to be equally distributed among the different age groups. Good hearing outcomes in elderly patients are not secondary to a difference in SPHL duration. Age should not be a limiting factor for cochlear implantation decision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age effect; Auditory deprivation; Cochlear implant; Elderly; Performance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26676874     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3849-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  34 in total

1.  Cochlear implant patients and quality of life.

Authors:  P J Karinen; M J Sorri; T T Välimaa; K H Huttunen; H J Löppönen
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  2001

2.  Aging alters the neural representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Michael Piskosz; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-10-28       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 3.  Understanding the deafened brain: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation.

Authors:  D S Lazard; A-L Giraud; D Gnansia; B Meyer; O Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 4.  Some effects of aging on central auditory processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Martin; James F Jerger
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

5.  Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates.

Authors:  Janice Leung; Nae-Yuh Wang; Jennifer D Yeagle; Jill Chinnici; Stephen Bowditch; Howard W Francis; John K Niparko
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  Cochlear implants in the geriatric population: benefits outweigh risks.

Authors:  C A Buchman; M J Fucci; W M Luxford
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.697

7.  Improvement of cognitive function after cochlear implantation in elderly patients.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Mathieu Marx; Bernard Fraysse; Eric Truy; Geneviève Lina-Granade; Michel Mondain; Françoise Sterkers-Artières; Philippe Bordure; Alain Robier; Benoit Godey; Bernard Meyer; Bruno Frachet; Christine Poncet-Wallet; Didier Bouccara; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 8.  Cochlear implantation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James M Gaylor; Gowri Raman; Mei Chung; Jounghee Lee; Madhumathi Rao; Joseph Lau; Dennis S Poe
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Cochlear implantation in older adults: long-term analysis of complications and device survival in a consecutive series.

Authors:  David S Chen; Danisa M Clarrett; Lingsheng Li; Steve P Bowditch; John K Niparko; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Christophe Vincent; Frédéric Venail; Paul Van de Heyning; Eric Truy; Olivier Sterkers; Piotr H Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski; Karen Schauwers; Stephen O'Leary; Deborah Mawman; Bert Maat; Andrea Kleine-Punte; Alexander M Huber; Kevin Green; Paul J Govaerts; Bernard Fraysse; Richard Dowell; Norbert Dillier; Elaine Burke; Andy Beynon; François Bergeron; Deniz Başkent; Françoise Artières; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation in the elderly: outcomes, long-term evolution, and predictive factors.

Authors:  Leire Garcia-Iza; Zuriñe Martinez; Ane Ugarte; Mercedes Fernandez; Xabier Altuna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults is Time-sensitive Towards Positive Outcome: Prediction using Advanced Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Hosung Kim; Woo Seok Kang; Hong Ju Park; Jee Yeon Lee; Jun Woo Park; Yehree Kim; Ji Won Seo; Min Young Kwak; Byung Chul Kang; Chan Joo Yang; Ben A Duffy; Young Sang Cho; Sang-Youp Lee; Myung Whan Suh; Il Joon Moon; Joong Ho Ahn; Yang-Sun Cho; Seung Ha Oh; Jong Woo Chung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolai Bernhard; Ulrich Gauger; Eugenia Romo Ventura; Florian C Uecker; Heidi Olze; Steffen Knopke; Toni Hänsel; Annekatrin Coordes
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.