A Eliot Shearer1, Robert W Eppsteiner1, Kathy Frees1, Viral Tejani1, Christina M Sloan-Heggen1, Carolyn Brown2, Paul Abbas2, Camille Dunn1, Marlan R Hansen1, Bruce J Gantz1, Richard J H Smith3. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. 3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Interdepartmental PhD Program in Genetics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: richard-smith@uiowa.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation is an effective habilitation modality for adults with significant hearing loss. However, post-implant performance is variable. A portion of this variance in outcome can be attributed to clinical factors. Recent physiological studies suggest that the health of the spiral ganglion also impacts post-operative cochlear implant outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine whether genetic factors affecting spiral ganglion neurons may be associated with cochlear implant performance. METHODS: Adults with post-lingual deafness who underwent cochlear implantation at the University of Iowa were studied. Pre-implantation evaluation included comprehensive genetic testing for genetic diagnosis. A novel score of genetic variants affecting genes with functional effects in the spiral ganglion was calculated. A Z-scored average of up to three post-operative speech perception tests (CNC, HINT, and AzBio) was used to assess outcome. RESULTS: Genetically determined spiral ganglion health affects cochlear implant outcomes, and when considered in conjunction with clinically determined etiology of deafness, accounts for 18.3% of the variance in postoperative speech recognition outcomes. Cochlear implant recipients with deleterious genetic variants that affect the cochlear sensory organ perform significantly better on tests of speech perception than recipients with deleterious genetic variants that affect the spiral ganglion. CONCLUSION: Etiological diagnosis of deafness including genetic testing is the single largest predictor of postoperative speech outcomes in adult cochlear implant recipients. A detailed understanding of the genetic underpinning of hearing loss will better inform pre-implant counseling. The method presented here should serve as a guide for further research into the molecular physiology of the peripheral auditory system and cochlear implants.
BACKGROUND:Cochlear implantation is an effective habilitation modality for adults with significant hearing loss. However, post-implant performance is variable. A portion of this variance in outcome can be attributed to clinical factors. Recent physiological studies suggest that the health of the spiral ganglion also impacts post-operative cochlear implant outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine whether genetic factors affecting spiral ganglion neurons may be associated with cochlear implant performance. METHODS: Adults with post-lingual deafness who underwent cochlear implantation at the University of Iowa were studied. Pre-implantation evaluation included comprehensive genetic testing for genetic diagnosis. A novel score of genetic variants affecting genes with functional effects in the spiral ganglion was calculated. A Z-scored average of up to three post-operative speech perception tests (CNC, HINT, and AzBio) was used to assess outcome. RESULTS: Genetically determined spiral ganglion health affects cochlear implant outcomes, and when considered in conjunction with clinically determined etiology of deafness, accounts for 18.3% of the variance in postoperative speech recognition outcomes. Cochlear implant recipients with deleterious genetic variants that affect the cochlear sensory organ perform significantly better on tests of speech perception than recipients with deleterious genetic variants that affect the spiral ganglion. CONCLUSION: Etiological diagnosis of deafness including genetic testing is the single largest predictor of postoperative speech outcomes in adult cochlear implant recipients. A detailed understanding of the genetic underpinning of hearing loss will better inform pre-implant counseling. The method presented here should serve as a guide for further research into the molecular physiology of the peripheral auditory system and cochlear implants.
Authors: A Eliot Shearer; E Ann Black-Ziegelbein; Michael S Hildebrand; Robert W Eppsteiner; Harini Ravi; Swati Joshi; Angelica C Guiffre; Christina M Sloan; Scott Happe; Susanna D Howard; Barbara Novak; Adam P Deluca; Kyle R Taylor; Todd E Scheetz; Terry A Braun; Thomas L Casavant; William J Kimberling; Emily M Leproust; Richard J H Smith Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Douglas P Sladen; Christopher D Frisch; Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; Jennifer H Torres; Daniel M Zeitler Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Christopher H Raine; Quentin Summerfield; David R Strachan; Jane M Martin; Catherine Totten Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Diane S Lazard; Christophe Vincent; Frédéric Venail; Paul Van de Heyning; Eric Truy; Olivier Sterkers; Piotr H Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski; Karen Schauwers; Stephen O'Leary; Deborah Mawman; Bert Maat; Andrea Kleine-Punte; Alexander M Huber; Kevin Green; Paul J Govaerts; Bernard Fraysse; Richard Dowell; Norbert Dillier; Elaine Burke; Andy Beynon; François Bergeron; Deniz Başkent; Françoise Artières; Peter J Blamey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kristen L Seligman; A Eliot Shearer; Kathy Frees; Carla Nishimura; Diana Kolbe; Camille Dunn; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Richard J H Smith Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 5.591
Authors: A Eliot Shearer; Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Richard J H Smith Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 4.379