MOTIVATION: Structural characterization of protein interactions is necessary for understanding and modulating biological processes. On one hand, X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy provide atomic resolution structures but the data collection process is typically long and the success rate is low. On the other hand, computational methods for modeling assembly structures from individual components frequently suffer from high false-positive rate, rarely resulting in a unique solution. RESULTS: Here, we present a combined approach that computationally integrates data from a variety of fast and accessible experimental techniques for rapid and accurate structure determination of protein-protein complexes. The integrative method uses atomistic models of two interacting proteins and one or more datasets from five accessible experimental techniques: a small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) profile, 2D class average images from negative-stain electron microscopy micrographs (EM), a 3D density map from single-particle negative-stain EM, residue type content of the protein-protein interface from NMR spectroscopy and chemical cross-linking detected by mass spectrometry. The method is tested on a docking benchmark consisting of 176 known complex structures and simulated experimental data. The near-native model is the top scoring one for up to 61% of benchmark cases depending on the included experimental datasets; in comparison to 10% for standard computational docking. We also collected SAXS, 2D class average images and 3D density map from negative-stain EM to model the PCSK9 antigen-J16 Fab antibody complex, followed by validation of the model by a subsequently available X-ray crystallographic structure.
MOTIVATION: Structural characterization of protein interactions is necessary for understanding and modulating biological processes. On one hand, X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy provide atomic resolution structures but the data collection process is typically long and the success rate is low. On the other hand, computational methods for modeling assembly structures from individual components frequently suffer from high false-positive rate, rarely resulting in a unique solution. RESULTS: Here, we present a combined approach that computationally integrates data from a variety of fast and accessible experimental techniques for rapid and accurate structure determination of protein-protein complexes. The integrative method uses atomistic models of two interacting proteins and one or more datasets from five accessible experimental techniques: a small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) profile, 2D class average images from negative-stain electron microscopy micrographs (EM), a 3D density map from single-particle negative-stain EM, residue type content of the protein-protein interface from NMR spectroscopy and chemical cross-linking detected by mass spectrometry. The method is tested on a docking benchmark consisting of 176 known complex structures and simulated experimental data. The near-native model is the top scoring one for up to 61% of benchmark cases depending on the included experimental datasets; in comparison to 10% for standard computational docking. We also collected SAXS, 2D class average images and 3D density map from negative-stain EM to model the PCSK9 antigen-J16 Fab antibody complex, followed by validation of the model by a subsequently available X-ray crystallographic structure.
Authors: Dmitry Lyumkis; Arne Moeller; Anchi Cheng; Amber Herold; Eric Hou; Christopher Irving; Erica L Jacovetty; Pick-Wei Lau; Anke M Mulder; James Pulokas; Joel D Quispe; Neil R Voss; Clinton S Potter; Bridget Carragher Journal: Methods Enzymol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.600
Authors: Greg L Hura; Angeli L Menon; Michal Hammel; Robert P Rambo; Farris L Poole; Susan E Tsutakawa; Francis E Jenney; Scott Classen; Kenneth A Frankel; Robert C Hopkins; Sung-Jae Yang; Joseph W Scott; Bret D Dillard; Michael W W Adams; John A Tainer Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Andrey Parshin; Anthony L Shiver; Jookyung Lee; Maria Ozerova; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Carol A Gross; Sergei Borukhov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sjoerd J de Vries; Isaure Chauvot de Beauchêne; Christina E M Schindler; Martin Zacharias Journal: Biophys J Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Eric D Merkley; Steven Rysavy; Abdullah Kahraman; Ryan P Hafen; Valerie Daggett; Joshua N Adkins Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: Thomas A Hopf; Charlotta P I Schärfe; João P G L M Rodrigues; Anna G Green; Oliver Kohlbacher; Chris Sander; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Debora S Marks Journal: Elife Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Lester Carter; Seung Joong Kim; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Jan Stöhr; Guillaume Poncet-Montange; Thomas M Weiss; Hiro Tsuruta; Stanley B Prusiner; Andrej Sali Journal: Biophys J Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 4.033