Literature DB >> 20839234

Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI.

Marc F Lensink1, Shoshana J Wodak.   

Abstract

Reliable prediction of the amino acid residues involved in protein-protein interfaces can provide valuable insight into protein function, and inform mutagenesis studies, and drug design applications. A fast-growing number of methods are being proposed for predicting protein interfaces, using structural information, energetic criteria, or sequence conservation or by integrating multiple criteria and approaches. Overall however, their performance remains limited, especially when applied to nonobligate protein complexes, where the individual components are also stable on their own. Here, we evaluate interface predictions derived from protein-protein docking calculations. To this end we measure the overlap between the interfaces in models of protein complexes submitted by 76 participants in CAPRI (Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions) and those of 46 observed interfaces in 20 CAPRI targets corresponding to nonobligate complexes. Our evaluation considers multiple models for each target interface, submitted by different participants, using a variety of docking methods. Although this results in a substantial variability in the prediction performance across participants and targets, clear trends emerge. Docking methods that perform best in our evaluation predict interfaces with average recall and precision levels of about 60%, for a small majority (60%) of the analyzed interfaces. These levels are significantly higher than those obtained for nonobligate complexes by most extant interface prediction methods. We find furthermore that a sizable fraction (24%) of the interfaces in models ranked as incorrect in the CAPRI assessment are actually correctly predicted (recall and precision ≥50%), and that these models contribute to 70% of the correct docking-based interface predictions overall. Our analysis proves that docking methods are much more successful in identifying interfaces than in predicting complexes, and suggests that these methods have an excellent potential of addressing the interface prediction challenge.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20839234     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  36 in total

1.  A machine learning approach for the prediction of protein surface loop flexibility.

Authors:  Howook Hwang; Thom Vreven; Troy W Whitfield; Kevin Wiehe; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-06-01

Review 2.  Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  A method for integrative structure determination of protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Andrea Rossi; Agustin Avila-Sakar; Seung Joong Kim; Javier Velázquez-Muriel; Pavel Strop; Hong Liang; Kristin A Krukenberg; Maofu Liao; Ho Min Kim; Solmaz Sobhanifar; Volker Dötsch; Arvind Rajpal; Jaume Pons; David A Agard; Yifan Cheng; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Solvated protein-DNA docking using HADDOCK.

Authors:  Marc van Dijk; Koen M Visscher; Panagiotis L Kastritis; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Protein-protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination.

Authors:  Srayanta Mukherjee; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  OPTIMIZATION BIAS IN ENERGY-BASED STRUCTURE PREDICTION.

Authors:  Robert J Petrella
Journal:  J Theor Comput Chem       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.939

8.  Performance of MDockPP in CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 including the prediction of water-mediated interactions.

Authors:  Xianjin Xu; Liming Qiu; Chengfei Yan; Zhiwei Ma; Sam Z Grinter; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-12-02

9.  Methods of protein structure comparison.

Authors:  Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

10.  Inclusion of the orientational entropic effect and low-resolution experimental information for protein-protein docking in Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (CAPRI).

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Chengfei Yan; Sam Z Grinter; Shan Chang; Lin Jiang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.