Literature DB >> 23090530

Cervical carcinoma rates among young females in the United States.

Vicki B Benard1, Meg Watson, Philip E Castle, Mona Saraiya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: All national organizations now recommend that women be screened for cervical cancer beginning at age 21 years, regardless of age of sexual initiation; however, studies have shown that providers continue to screen much earlier than recommended. Two federal cancer surveillance systems were used to quantify the burden of invasive cervical carcinoma among women younger than 40 years of age.
METHODS: We examined combined data from the National Program of Cancer Registries and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program covering 92% of the U.S. population. We calculated the age-adjusted incidence of cervical carcinoma among women younger than age 40 years by age, race, ethnicity, and histology for the time period of 1999-2008.
RESULTS: For women younger than age 40 years, 78% of the cervical cancer cases were diagnosed in women aged 30-39, 21% were diagnosed in women 20-29 years of age, and 1% was diagnosed in women younger than age 20 years. There was an average of 3,063 cases of invasive cervical carcinomas annually from 1999 through 2008, with an average of 14 carcinomas per year (rate of 0.15 per 100,000 females) among those aged 15-19 years, and 125 carcinomas per year (rate of 1.4 per 100,000 females) among those aged 20-24 years.
CONCLUSION: Cervical cancer is very rare in young women. Widespread implementation of Pap testing over the past four decades has detected very few cases of cervical cancer in women younger than 25 while potentially causing harm with unnecessary follow-up interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23090530      PMCID: PMC4540330          DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31826e4609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  28 in total

1.  Cervical cancer incidence in a prevaccine era in the United States, 1998-2002.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya; Faruque Ahmed; Sheila Krishnan; Thomas B Richards; Elizabeth R Unger; Herschel W Lawson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kyrgiou; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; M Arbyn; W Prendiville; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Worldwide human papillomavirus etiology of cervical adenocarcinoma and its cofactors: implications for screening and prevention.

Authors:  Xavier Castellsagué; Mireia Díaz; Silvia de Sanjosé; Nubia Muñoz; Rolando Herrero; Silvia Franceschi; Rosanna W Peeling; Rhoda Ashley; Jennifer S Smith; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer; F Xavier Bosch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Misclassification of race/ethnicity in a population-based cancer registry (United States).

Authors:  Scarlett L Gomez; Sally L Glaser
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Adherence to guidelines for follow-up of low-grade cytologic abnormalities among medically underserved women.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Herschel W Lawson; Christie R Eheman; Christa Anderson; William Helsel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Risk factors for rapid-onset cervical cancer.

Authors:  A Hildesheim; O Hadjimichael; P E Schwartz; C M Wheeler; W Barnes; D M Lowell; J Willett; M Schiffman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Human papillomavirus 16 and 18 L1 serology compared across anogenital cancer sites.

Authors:  J J Carter; M M Madeleine; K Shera; S M Schwartz; K L Cushing-Haugen; G C Wipf; P Porter; J R Daling; J K McDougall; D A Galloway
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Cervical cancer incidence in the United States by area of residence, 1998 2001.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Steven S Coughlin; Trevor Thompson; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Case completeness and data accuracy in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries.

Authors:  Kathleen K Thoburn; Robert R German; Mary Lewis; Phyllis Janie Nichols; Faruque Ahmed; Jeannette Jackson-Thompson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Psychological effects of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear test result: anxiety and associated factors.

Authors:  N M Gray; L Sharp; S C Cotton; L F Masson; J Little; L G Walker; M Avis; Z Philips; I Russell; D Whynes; M Cruickshank; C M Woolley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  23 in total

1.  Exceptional Response to Nivolumab in a 13-Year-Old Female with Metastatic HPV-Negative Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Joseph H Oved; Ashley Graul; Robert A Burger; Lauren E Schwartz; M Carolina Reyes; Frank M Balis
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.311

2.  Parental Choice of Recall Method for HPV Vaccination: A Pragmatic Trial.

Authors:  Allison Kempe; Sean T O'Leary; Jo Ann Shoup; Shannon Stokley; Steven Lockhart; Anna Furniss; L Miriam Dickinson; Juliana Barnard; Matthew F Daley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Estimating the impact of increasing cervical cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program among low-income women in the USA.

Authors:  Lisa M Pollack; Donatus U Ekwueme; Mei-Chuan Hung; Jacqueline W Miller; Su-Hsin Chang
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Perceived effectiveness of HPV test as a primary screening modality among US providers.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Provider management of equivocal cervical cancer screening results among underserved women, 2009-2011: follow-up of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Meg Watson; Vicki Benard; Lavinia Lin; Tanner Rockwell; Janet Royalty
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Effects of the Prophylactic HPV Vaccines on HPV Type Prevalence and Cervical Pathology.

Authors:  Ian N Hampson
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.818

7.  Screening adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Lori A Boardman; Katina Robison
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Age-specific occurrence of HPV16- and HPV18-related cervical cancer.

Authors:  Silvia de Sanjose; Cosette M Wheeler; Wim G V Quint; William C Hunt; Nancy E Joste; Laia Alemany; F Xavier Bosch; Evan R Myers; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Population-Based Incidence Rates of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Era.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Philip E Castle; Steven A Jenison; William C Hunt; Jane J Kim; Jack Cuzick; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ruofei Du; Michael Robertson; Scott Norville; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Effects of HIV infection on metastatic cervical cancer and age at diagnosis among patients in Lusaka, Zambia.

Authors:  Mario Jesus Trejo; Amr S Soliman; Yuli Chen; Mulele Kalima; Alick Chuba; Eslone Chama; Catherine K Mwaba; Lewis Banda; Kennedy Lishimpi
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.