Literature DB >> 15932824

Adherence to guidelines for follow-up of low-grade cytologic abnormalities among medically underserved women.

Vicki B Benard1, Herschel W Lawson, Christie R Eheman, Christa Anderson, William Helsel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) who had findings on a Papanicolaou (Pap) test of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) were followed up in accordance with the interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology.
METHODS: For this study period, the guidelines for a Pap result of ASC-US or LSIL specified follow-up by Pap tests repeated every 4 to 6 months for 2 years. If a second report of ASC-US or LSIL was made, the patient was to have colposcopy. We analyzed data from 10,004 women who had a result of ASC-US or LSIL followed by a second ASC-US or LSIL from 1991-2000.
RESULTS: As judged by the guidelines, 44% of women who had 2 low-grade abnormalities were followed up appropriately with colposcopy. Among women with 2 ASC-US results, those aged less than 30 years were more likely to receive colposcopy than the other age groups, while women who were aged 60 years and older were more likely to be followed up with a third Pap test. For each of the 4 result groups, American Indian or Alaska Native women had the highest percentages of a third Pap test, whereas Black or African-American women had a higher percentage of no follow-up.
CONCLUSION: More than one half of the women studied were not followed up in accordance with the established guidelines for managing abnormal cervical cytology. Factors such as age and race or ethnicity influence whether women with cytologic abnormalities receive appropriate follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15932824     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000159549.56601.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  30 in total

1.  Factors associated with time to colposcopy after abnormal Pap testing in HIV-infected women.

Authors:  Amy S Baranoski; Elizabeth A Stier
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Predictors of adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear among underserved inner-city women.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Erin K Tagai; Kuang-Yi Wen; Minsun Lee; Siu-Kuen Azor Hui; Deirdre Kurtz; John Scarpato; Enrique Hernandez
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-01-31

3.  Using the word 'cancer' in communication about an abnormal Pap test: finding common ground with patient-provider communication.

Authors:  Melissa A Simon; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Veenu Randhawa; Priya John; Gregory Makoul; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

Review 4.  Gynecologic cancer disparities: a report from the Health Disparities Taskforce of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Yvonne Collins; Kevin Holcomb; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Dineo Khabele; John H Farley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program data validation project.

Authors:  Christie R Eheman; Steven Leadbetter; Vicki B Benard; A Blythe Ryerson; Janet E Royalty; Donald Blackman; Lori A Pollack; Paula Willey Adams; Fran Babcock
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Cervical carcinoma rates among young females in the United States.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Meg Watson; Philip E Castle; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Invasive cervical cancer risk among HIV-infected women: a North American multicohort collaboration prospective study.

Authors:  Alison G Abraham; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Yuezhou Jing; Stephen J Gange; Timothy R Sterling; Michael J Silverberg; Michael S Saag; Sean B Rourke; Anita Rachlis; Sonia Napravnik; Richard D Moore; Marina B Klein; Mari M Kitahata; Gregory D Kirk; Robert S Hogg; Nancy A Hessol; James J Goedert; M John Gill; Kelly A Gebo; Joseph J Eron; Eric A Engels; Robert Dubrow; Heidi M Crane; John T Brooks; Ronald J Bosch; Howard D Strickler
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

8.  ACCISS study rationale and design: activating collaborative cancer information service support for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Veenu Randhawa; H Gene McFadden; Angela Fought; Emily Bullard; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Predictors of timely follow-up after abnormal cancer screening among women seeking care at urban community health centers.

Authors:  Tracy A Battaglia; M Christina Santana; Sharon Bak; Manjusha Gokhale; Timothy L Lash; Arlene S Ash; Richard Kalish; Stephen Tringale; James O Taylor; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Variations in practice guideline adherence for abnormal cervical cytology in a county healthcare system.

Authors:  Rita Singhal; Lisa V Rubenstein; Mingming Wang; Martin L Lee; Anwar Raza; Christine H Holschneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.