Meg Watson1, Vicki Benard, Lavinia Lin, Tanner Rockwell, Janet Royalty. 1. Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE MS-F76, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA, mwatson2@cdc.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Reflex human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is the preferred triage option for most women diagnosed with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). This study was conducted to describe follow-up results of women with ASC-US Pap test results in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP), focusing on HPV test use. METHODS: We examined the follow-up of 45,049 women in the NBCCEDP with ASC-US Pap tests during 2009-2011. Data on demographic characteristics, diagnostic procedures, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: NBCCEDP providers diagnosed 45,049 women (4.5 % of all Pap tests) with an ASC-US result. Of those, 28,271 (62.8 %) were followed with an HPV test, 3,883 (8.6 %) with a repeat Pap test, 6,592 (14.6 %) with colposcopy, and 6,303 were lost to follow-up (14.0 %). Women aged 40 and older were followed more often with an HPV test. White, black, and Asian/Pacific Islander women were followed more often with an HPV test after an ASC-US Pap compared to Hispanic and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. Among women with a positive HPV test on follow-up, almost 90 % continued with colposcopy as recommended. AI/AN women had the highest rates of HPV positivity (55.2 %) and of no follow-up (25.0 %). CONCLUSION: This is the first analysis describing follow-up of ASC-US Pap test results in the NBCCEDP, providing a window into current management of ASC-US results. Findings raise concerns about persistent disparities among AI/AN women. During 2009-2011, nearly two-thirds of women with an ASC-US Pap test result were followed with an HPV reflex test.
PURPOSE: Reflex human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is the preferred triage option for most women diagnosed with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). This study was conducted to describe follow-up results of women with ASC-US Pap test results in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP), focusing on HPV test use. METHODS: We examined the follow-up of 45,049 women in the NBCCEDP with ASC-US Pap tests during 2009-2011. Data on demographic characteristics, diagnostic procedures, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: NBCCEDP providers diagnosed 45,049 women (4.5 % of all Pap tests) with an ASC-US result. Of those, 28,271 (62.8 %) were followed with an HPV test, 3,883 (8.6 %) with a repeat Pap test, 6,592 (14.6 %) with colposcopy, and 6,303 were lost to follow-up (14.0 %). Women aged 40 and older were followed more often with an HPV test. White, black, and Asian/Pacific Islander women were followed more often with an HPV test after an ASC-US Pap compared to Hispanic and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. Among women with a positive HPV test on follow-up, almost 90 % continued with colposcopy as recommended. AI/AN women had the highest rates of HPV positivity (55.2 %) and of no follow-up (25.0 %). CONCLUSION: This is the first analysis describing follow-up of ASC-US Pap test results in the NBCCEDP, providing a window into current management of ASC-US results. Findings raise concerns about persistent disparities among AI/AN women. During 2009-2011, nearly two-thirds of women with an ASC-US Pap test result were followed with an HPV reflex test.
Authors: Vicki B Benard; William Howe; Mona Saraiya; William Helsel; Herschel W Lawson Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Grace A Alfonsi; S Deblina Datta; Theresa Mickiewicz; Laura A Koutsky; Khalil Ghanem; Michael Hagensee; Peter Kerndt; Katherine Hsu; Hillard Weinstock; Judith C Shlay Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Vicki B Benard; Mona S Saraiya; Ashwini Soman; Katherine B Roland; K Robin Yabroff; Jackie Miller Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Barbara S Apgar; Anne L Kittendorf; Catherine M Bettcher; Jean Wong; Amanda J Kaufman Journal: Am Fam Physician Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 3.292
Authors: Thomas C Wright; L Stewart Massad; Charles J Dunton; Mark Spitzer; Edward J Wilkinson; Diane Solomon Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Katrina F Trivers; Vicki B Benard; Christie R Eheman; Janet E Royalty; Donatus U Ekwueme; Herschel W Lawson Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Virginia Senkomago; Janet Royalty; Jacqueline W Miller; Lee E Buenconsejo-Lum; Vicki B Benard; Mona Saraiya Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Tom Collins; Lindsay R Stradtman; Robin C Vanderpool; Deborah R Neace; Karen D Cooper Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Yan-Ying Wang; Ling-Hua Kong; Yang Liu; Shu Wang; Qing-Bo Fan; Lan Zhu; Jing-He Lang Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.889