Lisa M Pollack1, Donatus U Ekwueme2, Mei-Chuan Hung3, Jacqueline W Miller2, Su-Hsin Chang4. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus, Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. 2. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA. 3. Leidos Inc., Atlanta, GA, 30345, USA. 4. Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus, Box 8100, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. chang.su-hsin@wustl.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides free cervical cancer screening to low-income women. This study estimated the health benefits gained in terms of life years (LYs) saved and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained if cervical cancer screening by the NBCCEDP increased to reach more eligible women. METHODS: Data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, NBCCEDP, and Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys were used. LYs saved and QALYs gained/100,000 women were estimated using modeling methods. They were used to predict additional health benefits gained if screening by the NBCCEDP increased from 6.5% up to 10-25% of the eligible women. RESULTS: Overall, per 100,000 women screened by the NBCCEDP, 1,731 LYs were saved and 1,608 QALYs were gained. For white women, 1,926 LYs were saved and 1,780 QALYs were gained/100,000 women screened by the NBCCEDP. For black women, 1,506 LYs were saved and 1,300 QALYs were gained/100,000 women screened. If the proportion of eligible women screened by the NBCCEDP increased to 10-25%, the estimated health benefits would range from 6,626-34,896 LYs saved and 6,153-32,407 QALYs gained. CONCLUSIONS: The reported estimates emphasize the value of cervical cancer screening program by extending LE in low-income women. Further, it demonstrates that screening a higher percentage of eligible women in the NBCCEDP may yield more health benefits.
PURPOSE: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides free cervical cancer screening to low-income women. This study estimated the health benefits gained in terms of life years (LYs) saved and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained if cervical cancer screening by the NBCCEDP increased to reach more eligible women. METHODS: Data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, NBCCEDP, and Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys were used. LYs saved and QALYs gained/100,000 women were estimated using modeling methods. They were used to predict additional health benefits gained if screening by the NBCCEDP increased from 6.5% up to 10-25% of the eligible women. RESULTS: Overall, per 100,000 women screened by the NBCCEDP, 1,731 LYs were saved and 1,608 QALYs were gained. For white women, 1,926 LYs were saved and 1,780 QALYs were gained/100,000 women screened by the NBCCEDP. For black women, 1,506 LYs were saved and 1,300 QALYs were gained/100,000 women screened. If the proportion of eligible women screened by the NBCCEDP increased to 10-25%, the estimated health benefits would range from 6,626-34,896 LYs saved and 6,153-32,407 QALYs gained. CONCLUSIONS: The reported estimates emphasize the value of cervical cancer screening program by extending LE in low-income women. Further, it demonstrates that screening a higher percentage of eligible women in the NBCCEDP may yield more health benefits.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cervical cancer; Low-income; National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP); Screening
Authors: Lisa C Richardson; Janet Royalty; William Howe; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Vicki B Benard Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mohua Basu; Jared Linebarger; Sheryl G A Gabram; Sharla Gayle Patterson; Miral Amin; Kevin C Ward Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Donatus U Ekwueme; Vladislav J Uzunangelov; Thomas J Hoerger; Jacqueline W Miller; Mona Saraiya; Vicki B Benard; Ingrid J Hall; Janet Royalty; Chunyu Li; Evan R Myers Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Florence K L Tangka; David H Howard; Janet Royalty; Lucinda P Dalzell; Jacqueline Miller; Brett J O'Hara; Susan A Sabatino; Kristy Joseph; Kristy Kenney; Gery P Guy; Ingrid J Hall Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Lindsay M Sabik; Natasha K Stout; Michael T Halpern; Joseph Lipscomb; Scott Ramsey; Debra P Ritzwoller Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2022-07-05
Authors: Cathy J Bradley; Lindsay M Sabik; Julia Entwistle; Jennifer L Stevens; Lindsey Enewold; Joan L Warren Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Ada Pariser; Kelly A Hirko; Gladys M Muñoz; Gladys Pico-Gleason; Chelsea Robinson; Jean M Kerver Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2022 Jan-Dec