Literature DB >> 26116889

Perceived effectiveness of HPV test as a primary screening modality among US providers.

Crystale Purvis Cooper1, Mona Saraiya2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The human papillomavirus (HPV) test, administered alone without the Papanicolaou (Pap) test, was recently recognized as a cervical cancer screening option in the United States by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the Food and Drug Administration has approved an HPV test for primary screening.
METHODS: Surveys of US internists, family practitioners, nurse practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists were conducted in 2009 and 2012 to investigate providers' perceptions of the effectiveness of the HPV test administered alone as a population-based screening modality (2009: N=1040, 141-494 per provider group; 2012: N=1039, 155-435 per provider group).
RESULTS: The majority in each provider group agreed that the HPV test administered alone is an effective screening modality in 2009 (75.3%-86.1%) and 2012 (79.5%-91.8%), and agreement rose significantly during this time period among family practitioners (χ(2)=15.26, df=1, p<0.001) and nurse practitioners (χ(2)=4.53, df=1, p=0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: Agreement that the HPV test administered alone is an effective cervical cancer screening modality was widespread among providers in both 2009 and 2012, however implementation of guidelines for screening with the HPV test may be influenced by many other factors including reimbursement and patient preferences. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Health care providers; Human papillomavirus DNA test; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26116889      PMCID: PMC4547872          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  18 in total

Review 1.  American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carolyn D Runowicz; Diane Solomon; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Robert A Smith; Harmon J Eyre; Carmel Cohen
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987-2000).

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; David E Nelson; Helen I Meissner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 45, August 2003. Cervical cytology screening (replaces committee opinion 152, March 1995).

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Is probability sampling always better? A comparison of results from a quota and a probability sample survey.

Authors:  R G Cumming
Journal:  Community Health Stud       Date:  1990

6.  The effect of HEDIS measurement of colorectal cancer screening on insurance plans in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Mona Sarfaty; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States.

Authors:  Eileen F Dunne; Elizabeth R Unger; Maya Sternberg; Geraldine McQuillan; David C Swan; Sonya S Patel; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Epidemiology and natural history of human papillomavirus infections in the female genital tract.

Authors:  Kevin A Ault
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006

10.  Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study.

Authors:  Joakim Dillner; Matejka Rebolj; Philippe Birembaut; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Anne Szarewski; Christian Munk; Silvia de Sanjose; Pontus Naucler; Belen Lloveras; Susanne Kjaer; Jack Cuzick; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Christine Clavel; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-10-13
View more
  6 in total

1.  Role of Screening History in Clinical Meaning and Optimal Management of Positive Cervical Screening Results.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Walter K Kinney; Xiaonan Xue; Li C Cheung; Julia C Gage; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas S Lorey; Hormuzd A Katki; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The role of primary care Nurse Practitioners in reducing barriers to cervical cancer screening: A literature review.

Authors:  Elizabeth M King; David S Busolo
Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J       Date:  2022-04-01

3. 

Authors:  Elizabeth M King; David S Busolo
Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Primary HPV testing recommendations of US providers, 2015.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.

Authors:  Thibaut Raginel; Guillaume Grandazzi; Guy Launoy; Mélanie Trocmé; Véronique Christophe; Célia Berchi; Lydia Guittet
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Clinical significance of human papillomavirus genotyping.

Authors:  Youn Jin Choi; Jong Sup Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.401

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.