Literature DB >> 16551312

Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial.

Adrianne Feldstein1, Patricia J Elmer, David H Smith, Michael Herson, Eric Orwoll, Chuhe Chen, Mikel Aickin, Martha C Swain.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Osteoporosis treatment rates after a fracture are low. This study evaluated methods to increase guideline-recommended osteoporosis care postfracture.
DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to usual care or one of two interventions. Analysis of primary outcomes used electronic data and linear regression.
SETTING: A Pacific Northwest nonprofit health maintenance organization. PARTICIPANTS: Female patients aged 50 to 89 who suffered a fracture in 1999 and had not received bone mineral density (BMD) measurement or medication for osteoporosis (n=311) and their primary care providers (n=159). INTERVENTION: Patient-specific clinical guideline advice to the primary care provider delivered by electronic medical record (EMR) message or electronic reminder to the provider plus an educational letter mailed to the patient. MEASUREMENTS: BMD measurement and osteoporosis medication.
RESULTS: At 6 months, provider reminder resulted in 51.5% of patients receiving BMD measurement or osteoporosis medication, provider reminder plus patient education resulted in 43.1%, and usual care resulted in 5.9% (P<.001). The effect of provider advice combined with patient education was not significantly different from provider advice alone (P=.88). Patients aged 60 to 69 were 18% (95% confidence interval=3-34) more likely to receive BMD measurement or an osteoporosis medication than those aged 80 to 89.
CONCLUSION: Patient-specific postfracture advice to the provider through an EMR message significantly increased BMD measurement and osteoporosis medication. As EMRs become more widespread, this intervention could improve osteoporosis management for many postfracture patients. Future research should identify barriers to and facilitators of care for older, high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16551312     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00618.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  78 in total

1.  Secondary prevention program for osteoporotic fractures and long-term adherence to bisphosphonates.

Authors:  S Ojeda-Bruno; A Naranjo; F Francisco-Hernández; C Erausquin; I Rúa-Figueroa; J C Quevedo; C Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Testing and treatment for osteoporosis following hip fracture in an integrated U.S. healthcare delivery system.

Authors:  A Shibli-Rahhal; M S Vaughan-Sarrazin; K Richardson; P Cram
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Underprescription of beneficial medicines in older people: causes, consequences and prevention.

Authors:  Antonio Cherubini; Andrea Corsonello; Fabrizia Lattanzio
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Development of an electronic medical record based intervention to improve medical care of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B J Edwards; A D Bunta; J Anderson; A Bobb; A Hahr; K J O'Leary; A Agulnek; L Andruszyn; K A Cameron; M May; N H Kazmers; N Dillon; D W Baker; M V Williams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Nurse case-manager vs multifaceted intervention to improve quality of osteoporosis care after wrist fracture: randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  S R Majumdar; J A Johnson; D Bellerose; F A McAlister; A S Russell; D A Hanley; S Garg; D A Lier; W P Maksymowych; D W Morrish; B H Rowe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Little; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Brent Mollon; Jaron Chong; Anne M Holbrook; Melani Sung; Lehana Thabane; Gary Foster
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007).

Authors:  Sallie-Anne Pearson; Annette Moxey; Jane Robertson; Isla Hains; Margaret Williamson; James Reeve; David Newby
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianfranco Damiani; Luigi Pinnarelli; Simona C Colosimo; Roberta Almiento; Lorella Sicuro; Rocco Galasso; Lorenzo Sommella; Walter Ricciardi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.