Feasibility of detecting intravascular flow using a catheter based endovascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) system is demonstrated in a porcine carotid model in vivo. The effects of A-line density, radial distance, signal-to-noise ratio, non-uniform rotational distortion (NURD), phase stability of the swept wavelength laser and interferometer system on Doppler shift detection limit were investigated in stationary and flow phantoms. Techniques for NURD induced phase shift artifact removal were developed by tracking the catheter sheath. Detection of high flow velocity (~51 cm/s) present in the porcine carotid artery was obtained by phase unwrapping techniques and compared to numerical simulation, taking into consideration flow profile distortion by the eccentrically positioned imaging catheter. Using diluted blood in saline mixture as clearing agent, simultaneous Doppler OCT imaging of intravascular flow and structural OCT imaging of the carotid artery wall was feasible. To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo demonstration of Doppler imaging and absolute measurement of intravascular flow using a rotating fiber catheter in carotid artery.
Feasibility of detecting intravascular flow using a catheter based endovascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) system is demonstrated in a porcine carotid model in vivo. The effects of A-line density, radial distance, signal-to-noise ratio, non-uniform rotational distortion (NURD), phase stability of the swept wavelength laser and interferometer system on Doppler shift detection limit were investigated in stationary and flow phantoms. Techniques for NURD induced phase shift artifact removal were developed by tracking the catheter sheath. Detection of high flow velocity (~51 cm/s) present in the porcine carotid artery was obtained by phase unwrapping techniques and compared to numerical simulation, taking into consideration flow profile distortion by the eccentrically positioned imaging catheter. Using diluted blood in saline mixture as clearing agent, simultaneous Doppler OCT imaging of intravascular flow and structural OCT imaging of the carotid artery wall was feasible. To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo demonstration of Doppler imaging and absolute measurement of intravascular flow using a rotating fiber catheter in carotid artery.
Entities:
Keywords:
(120.5050) Phase measurement; (170.3880) Medical and biological imaging; (170.4500) Optical coherence tomography; (280.3340) Laser Doppler velocimetry
Blood flow velocity and volumetric flow measurements are important parameters for
assessment of the severity of stenosis and the outcome of interventional therapy.
Over the last two decades Duplex ultrasonogrophy [1,2] has become a routine imaging
and measurement technique for the detection and clinical monitoring of carotid
stenosis. Despite the inherent alteration of hemodynamics, as a consequence of
physically placing a catheter in the coronary artery, intravascular ultrasound
Doppler measurements [3] have been used for
coronary blood flow measurements. Other ultrasound techniques such as color coded
intravascular ultrasound blood flow imaging [4] and de-correlation based flow measurements [5] have been proposed to extract flow information from
cross-sectional IVUS data and display simultaneous morphological data and flow
information. Endovascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become an important
modality for coronary stenosis imaging and stenting evaluation [6]. However, limited in vivo
blood flow measurement has been conducted by endovascular OCT since the attempt by
Li et al. [7] to measure the
intraluminal velocity profile in a vessel phantom using a prototype OCT Doppler
catheter. Using color Doppler [8],
phase-resolved Doppler OCT [9,10], autocorrelation [11] or Kasai velocity estimation techniques [12] in a circumferentially scanning catheter
probe carries its own unique challenges. These include dilution of blood by saline
to improve OCT penetration, motion artifacts induced by the rotating optical probe,
and the radially dependent noise background of measured Doppler signals. The
widespread clinical use of the C7-XR OCT system (Lightlab Imaging, St. Jude Medical
Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA) would benefit from a technique compatible with
rotational OCT catheters for Doppler imaging. In this paper we show preliminary
results of in vivo intraluminal blood flow measurement using
endovascular OCT in a porcine carotid model.
2. Materials and methods
Porcine carotid imaging protocols were approved by the Animal Care Committees of
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada, and described previously [13,14]. We noted the C7-XR OCT
system has been applied to various endovascular structural imaging successfully with
its high frame rate of 100 frames/s. However this results in a ~500 A-scans in each
frame and contains insufficient overlap for adjacent pixels and thus the real-time
velocity estimation by phase resolved methods could not be obtained accurately
[15]. A custom-made data acquisition
system [16] was combined with the C7-XR OCT
system to acquire high-density A-line images at 20 frames/s rates that are suitable
for Doppler shift calculation.
2.1 System configuration
The system used in this study consists of the C7-XR OCT system and a personal
computer equipped with a data acquisition card (ATS9350, Alazartech) via PCIe x8
interface, a display card with graphics processing unit (GPU) for high speed
computation (GeForce GTX 460 1GB, NVIDIA) over PCIe x16 interface and a solid
state drive (Intel 510 Series 250GB) through SATA II interface. Figure 1(a)
displays the interconnections between the hardware and the motherboard,
and the connection between the personal computer and the back end of the C7-XR
OCT system, which enabled raw OCT signal acquisition, saving and
post-processing. The DAQ channels included a linear k-clock,
the A-scan trigger, and the raw OCT signal. Previously developed custom software
[16] was employed in this study with
addition of minor modifications to accommodate the endovascular OCT system that
provided a linear k-space sampling clock.
Fig. 1
Doppler imaging setup for endovascular OCT system. (a) High-speed
data acquisition and graphics processing unit (GPU) processor
connection to back end of C7-XR OCT system for high density A-line
imaging. Clk: k-clock, Trig: A-scan trigger, Ch1:
channel for raw OCT signal; DAQ: data acquisition; SSD: solid-state
drive. (b) The imaging catheter showing the Doppler angle of the
imaging beam, which is variable depending on the position of the
guide wire and catheter location. (c) A schematic diagram showing
the imaging catheter is not coaxial with the blood vessel.
θbf indicates the beam-to-flow angle.
Doppler imaging setup for endovascular OCT system. (a) High-speed
data acquisition and graphics processing unit (GPU) processor
connection to back end of C7-XR OCT system for high density A-line
imaging. Clk: k-clock, Trig: A-scan trigger, Ch1:
channel for raw OCT signal; DAQ: data acquisition; SSD: solid-state
drive. (b) The imaging catheter showing the Doppler angle of the
imaging beam, which is variable depending on the position of the
guide wire and catheter location. (c) A schematic diagram showing
the imaging catheter is not coaxial with the blood vessel.
θbf indicates the beam-to-flow angle.The angle between the scanning beam and the axis of catheter (C7 Dragonfly, St.
Jude Medical Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA) was measured to be ~70° in
air without water or saline injection from a measurement shown in Fig. 1(b). However, this angle may change
slightly during imaging due to refractive index variation of various mixing
ratios of water, blood, contrast and saline. Moreover, in most cases, the
imaging catheter is not coaxial with the blood vessel, as determined by the
positions of the guide wire and image catheter. This non-coaxial orientation
(shown in Fig. 1(c)) while in most cases
creates non-perpendicularity between the beam and flow direction such that the
Doppler signal induced by blood flow can be obtained also represents a source of
error in determining the absolute flow velocity.The flow velocity is calculated from Doppler shift obtained by Kasai
autocorrelation [15]. The resulting
measurement accuracy of blood flow depends on the size of the window used for
Kasai calculation and the percentage of voxel overlap between adjacent A-lines.
To optimize the radial and circumferential resolution, the percentage of overlap
of the window is carefully chosen based on the axial point spread function (PSF)
and spot size of the OCT system. The axial PSF at 3 dB is ~14 um in air,
resulting in ~10 um in tissue, which degrades due to multiple scattering of
photons and dispersion. However, previous research has shown that the variation
of PSF remains minimal within blood vessels, for example, approximately 4% at an
optical depth of 35 mean free path (mfp) [17]. The spot size and working distance (from the edge of the
catheter) of the catheter are 25 um and ~1.5 mm respectively. The scanning beam
diverges as the distance from the catheter is increased as shown in Fig. 2(a)
. The percentage of overlap of adjacent voxels according to the beam spots
is plotted in Fig. 2(b). The four curves
representing percentage of voxel overlap versus the distance from the catheter
for 2500 A-lines/frame, 1250 A-lines/frame, 830 A-lines/frame and 500
A-lines/frame respectively. It can be seen that the pixels still have ~80%
overlap at 4 mm away from the catheter at 2500 A-lines/frame, while the overlap
percentage decreases with the decreasing the A-line density. Therefore 2500
A-line/frame images would be more suitable for accurate Doppler shift
calculations. A 2 × 10 window (at depth and transverse directions
relative to the optical beam) was chosen for Kasai autocorrelation calculation
of Doppler shift to improve velocity detection sensitivity during Doppler
processing.
Fig. 2
(a) A schematic diagram showing the scanning beam from the imaging
catheter. (b) Percentage of voxel overlap changes with the distance
from the catheter for 2500 A-lines, 1250 A-lines, 830 A-lines and
500 A-lines per frame. The decline of voxel overlap between A-lines
limits adequate imaging of Doppler shift.
(a) A schematic diagram showing the scanning beam from the imaging
catheter. (b) Percentage of voxel overlap changes with the distance
from the catheter for 2500 A-lines, 1250 A-lines, 830 A-lines and
500 A-lines per frame. The decline of voxel overlap between A-lines
limits adequate imaging of Doppler shift.
2.2 Motion artifact of imaging catheter removal
Movement of the catheter induces artifact, which can be observed from the Doppler
image of the sheath of the catheter. The rotation and axial motion of the fiber
optic core within the catheter during endovascular imaging procedure also
contribute to the detected Doppler image artifacts, and limit the minimal
detectable velocity. Bending and twisting of the imaging catheter sheath,
unavoidable during in vivo navigation of the catheter through
the vasculature, can adversely couple with the high-speed rotation of the optic
fiber and induce vibration. The vibration can introduce undesired relative
motion (both radial and longitudinal) between the optic fiber and the catheter
sheath. The resultant non-uniform rotational distortion (NURD) [18], when severe, can induce obvious
artifacts in the structural imaging [19].
Phase sensitive imaging is more susceptible to such relative motion and
significant phase shift artifact can exist without obvious structural imaging
NURD.To understand the NURD induced phase shift artifacts caused by the complex fiber
motion and its effect on flow detection, a slow flow phantom was imaged with the
Dragonfly catheter. Homogenously diluted mixture of blood (1.5% by volume) in
saline, simulating imcompletely clearing of blood during salineflush, was
injected to the flow phantom at 50 ml/hr (corresponding to 3.5 mm/s maximal flow
velocity) using an infusion pump. The imaging results are shown in Fig. 3
. Figure 3(a) is a structural
image, from which the sheath and internal reflection of the imaging catheter can
be observed. The catheter sheath, containing inner and outer surface
reflections, can serve as reference surfaces for phase shift calibration against
the phase artifacts. In addition, internal multiple reflection, such as those
from the interface of focal elements in the fiber probe, may serve as phase
shift calibration against phase instability in the swept source laser,
interferometer and DAQ of the OCT system [10]. The Doppler shift generated in the internal reflection (red
curve in Fig. 3(b)) is < 0.02 rad,
therefore the phase instability induced error is negligible. The phase shift
generated on the catheter sheath (black curve in Fig. 3(b)) is due to the NURD induced phase artifact as the catheter
sheath is stable. Without removing the NURD artifacts, the slow flow rate
induced Doppler shift is completely masked as shown in Fig. 3(c). The total Doppler shift detected in the flow
region is a vector sum of the shift generated by the flowing particles and the
shift produced by the moving fiber optic. From Fig. 3(c), it can be seen that the bulk-phase change induced by the
oscillation of the fiber optic is constant along the radial direction. Therefore
the fiber motion artifact can be eliminated by subtracting the Doppler shift
measured on the sheath of the catheter. The corrected phase map is shown in
Fig. 3(d), where the average Doppler
shift of the flow is ~0.4 rad corresponding to flow velocity of 4 mm/s, which is
comparable with the theoretical value.
Fig. 3
Imaging of a slow flow phantom. (a) Structural image of 1.5% blood in
saline mixture within the tube, where arrow A indicates the internal
reflection of the imaging optics, and arrow B indicates the outer
surface of the imaging catheter sheath. (b) Phase shift obtained
from the internal reflection indicated by arrow A and catheter
sheath indicated by arrow B in (a). The phase shift of the catheter
sheath is the median of data along the catheter thickness. (c)
Doppler shift image of the slow flow phantom. The dashed ring
indicates the sheath of the imaging catheter, with phase shift
induced by NURD in a radially constant manner throughout the image.
(d) Doppler image after suppression of the motion artifact, which
displays the phase shift induced by the slow flow inside the tube
phantom. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Imaging of a slow flow phantom. (a) Structural image of 1.5% blood in
saline mixture within the tube, where arrow A indicates the internal
reflection of the imaging optics, and arrow B indicates the outer
surface of the imaging catheter sheath. (b) Phase shift obtained
from the internal reflection indicated by arrow A and catheter
sheath indicated by arrow B in (a). The phase shift of the catheter
sheath is the median of data along the catheter thickness. (c)
Doppler shift image of the slow flow phantom. The dashed ring
indicates the sheath of the imaging catheter, with phase shift
induced by NURD in a radially constant manner throughout the image.
(d) Doppler image after suppression of the motion artifact, which
displays the phase shift induced by the slow flow inside the tube
phantom. Scale bars = 1 mm.
2.3 Noise floor in Doppler shift measurement
During endovascular imaging, except for various motion artifacts, the density of
A-lines and the angular line spaces increasing along the radius would also
affect the Doppler shift calculation. A phantom was constructed to evaluate
these effects. The phantom was made of gelatin with TiO2 particles to
model scatterers (concentration: 0.5 g/l). The concentration of TiO2
was chosen to simulate relatively low SNR conditions that would be encountered
during in vivo endovascular imaging, with incomplete clearing
of blood in the vessel lumen. A tube with ~3 mm outer diameter was embedded to
allow insertion of the OCT catheter. The Dragonfly OCT imaging catheter was
advanced in the tube through a guide wire to the region of interest. Since there
is no movement of the phantom, any nonzero phase shift detected during this
procedure was attributed to measurement error. A cross-section of the phantom
was imaged by both 2500 A-lines per frame and 500 A-lines per frame. Figures 4(a)
and 4(b) demonstrate the
structural and color Doppler images after removing bulk motion induced by
catheter oscillation. Both images were acquired with 2500 A-lines per frame. The
white sector in Fig. 4(a) indicates a
region of interest (ROI), where the Doppler shift was calculated as shown in
Fig. 4(b). The standard deviation of
the phase shift determines the minimal detectable phase change. This parameter
varies with the radial distance and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the OCT
signal. Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show these relations for 2500 A-line
per frame mode, and in comparison, 500 A-line per frame mode. The latter showed
consistently higher noise floor in the phase measurement, and would not be
suitable for in vivo measurements. When the radial distance
from the catheter increases or when the SNR decreases, the phase measurement
noise floor increases as expected [10].
Fig. 4
(a) Structural image of a stationary tissue phantom with
TiO2 particles. White sector represents the ROI. (b)
Color Doppler image of the ROI after bulk motion correction. (c) The
standard deviation of the Doppler shift changes with radial distance
and (d) signal to noise ratio (SNR). The data points in (c) and (d)
represent five regions at different radial distances, consisting of
39,600 pixels (2500 A-lines per frame) or 7,920 pixels (500 A-lines
per frame). The low SNR phantom is constructed to mimic low SNR of
intraluminal blood typically encountered during in
vivo experiments. The Doppler noise floor increases at
the edge of the image with larger radial distance (less voxel
overlap between A-lines) and lower SNR.
(a) Structural image of a stationary tissue phantom with
TiO2 particles. White sector represents the ROI. (b)
Color Doppler image of the ROI after bulk motion correction. (c) The
standard deviation of the Doppler shift changes with radial distance
and (d) signal to noise ratio (SNR). The data points in (c) and (d)
represent five regions at different radial distances, consisting of
39,600 pixels (2500 A-lines per frame) or 7,920 pixels (500 A-lines
per frame). The low SNR phantom is constructed to mimic low SNR of
intraluminal blood typically encountered during in
vivo experiments. The Doppler noise floor increases at
the edge of the image with larger radial distance (less voxel
overlap between A-lines) and lower SNR.
3. In vivo porcine carotid artery imaging
Intravascular flow velocity profiles in porcine carotid arteries were imaged
in vivo using the above system setup. The in
vivo porcine carotid imaging procedure presented in this paper has been
previously described by our group [20] after
adaptation of using 1.5% by volume blood in saline mixture instead of pure saline as
the clearing agent injected by an automated pump during Doppler OCT imaging. Briefly
a femoral incision was made at the groin of the pig, which was continuously
anaesthetized. An 8-French catheter was inserted into the incision as the entry
point of the catheter system. Various catheters were used to aid the final insertion
of the guide wire and OCT imaging catheter to the carotid artery. Doppler OCT images
consisting of 2500 A-lines/frame were taken at a frame rate of 20 frames/s without
pullback.A 3-dimensional reconstruction from pull-back OCT imaging may help to deduce the
angle between the catheter axis and the vessel center-line, which may help with
better estimation of the beam to flow angle. Structural images of the vessel wall
were first obtained by flushing the blood with pure saline. A 3D structural image of
the vessel with catheter and guide wire inside are shown in Fig. 5(a)
, which shows the catheter is at approximately 10° angle with the
vessel wall. The insertion of a catheter into an artery leads to the formation of an
annular region between the catheter wall and the arterial wall. A comparison is made
with finite element simulation of eccentric annular flow. The simulation is carried
out with incompressible and Newtonian fluid with density of 1060 kg/m3
and viscosity of 0.003 Pa·s. Simulation geometry is set with vessel diameter
of 2.5 mm, catheter diameter 0.9 mm, and established laminar flow pattern. The
catheter is positioned eccentrically with a gap of 0.2 mm from the vessel wall. The
volumetric flow rate applied at the inlet was 5 ml/s, similar to typical salineflush injection rate used for the porcine experiments. The flow profile obtained
from the simulation is shown in Fig. 5(b),
where the maximum flow is ~57 cm/s.
Fig. 5
In vivo endovascular flow measurement. (a) 3D OCT image
of the catheter and the vessel wall, which shows the angle between the
catheter and the wall is ~10°. (b) Simulation results of blood
flow. (c) Cross-sectional OCT image of a porcine carotid artery with
shadow casted by guide wire. (d) The same cross-section as (c) imaged by
500 A-lines/frame with Doppler shift overlaid, showing mainly noise. (e)
and (f) (Media
1). (e) Phase shift image, 2500
A-lines/frame, without NURD induced phase artifact removal. It shows
distorted phase contour lines. (f) Phase shift image after NURD induced
phase artifact removal by tracking the phase shift in the catheter
sheath. The corrected phase contour lines are as expected. The NURD
induced artifact is time variant, as shown by
Media
1. (g) A typical cross-sectional
frame, 2500 A-lines/frame with Doppler shift overlaid, showing aliased
phase changes. (h) The unwrapped phase map of (g), where * indicates the
highest velocity region. The arrows indicate incorrect phase unwrapping
due to noise and high shear rate near the vessel wall. Scale bars = 1
mm.
In vivo endovascular flow measurement. (a) 3D OCT image
of the catheter and the vessel wall, which shows the angle between the
catheter and the wall is ~10°. (b) Simulation results of blood
flow. (c) Cross-sectional OCT image of a porcine carotid artery with
shadow casted by guide wire. (d) The same cross-section as (c) imaged by
500 A-lines/frame with Doppler shift overlaid, showing mainly noise. (e)
and (f) (Media
1). (e) Phase shift image, 2500
A-lines/frame, without NURD induced phase artifact removal. It shows
distorted phase contour lines. (f) Phase shift image after NURD induced
phase artifact removal by tracking the phase shift in the catheter
sheath. The corrected phase contour lines are as expected. The NURD
induced artifact is time variant, as shown by
Media
1. (g) A typical cross-sectional
frame, 2500 A-lines/frame with Doppler shift overlaid, showing aliased
phase changes. (h) The unwrapped phase map of (g), where * indicates the
highest velocity region. The arrows indicate incorrect phase unwrapping
due to noise and high shear rate near the vessel wall. Scale bars = 1
mm.At the end of flushing when the blood flow mixed with saline images of 500
A-lines/frame and 2500 A-lines/frame were both recorded for Doppler flow
measurement. One frame of the structural OCT image of porcine carotid artery
consisting of 2500 A-lines is shown in Fig. 5
(c). A seam line appear at the location of the transition between the
first and the last A-line due to changes in vessel dimension and relative catheter
motion during a cardiac cycle [20]. The
longer arrow denotes the guide wire and its artifact. The same cross section imaged
by 500 A-lines/frame overlaid with the Doppler signal is shown in Fig. 5(d), where the Doppler shift image shows
mainly noise, as expected. In comparison, Figs.
5(e), 5(f) and 5(g) show the 2500 A-lines images, without
Doppler artifact removal, with removal, and after applying structural mask to show
only the intravascular flow Doppler shift. Due to the high flow velocity in the
carotid vessel, the Doppler shift is aliased between [-π, π]. The
aliasing pattern within the vessel lumen is distorted by the NURD induced phase
artifacts, introducing significant asymmetry in the phase image, as shown in Fig. 5(e). Correction of the phase artifacts,
by tracking the phase shift observed on the catheter sheath, significantly reduces
the distortion and returns the aliasing contour lines towards the expected pattern.
The NURD induced phase artifacts are time variant as shown by video
(Media
1) and therefore, frame to frame subtraction
will not be sufficient. There are residual phase artifacts which may be greater than
those induced by vessel wall motion secondary to arterial pulsation.A quality-guided phase unwrapping algorithm [21] was used to unwrap the phase map and the corresponding unwrapped
phase map is shown in Fig. 5(h). The maximum
Doppler shift indicated by ‘*’ is ~24 rad, representing highest blood
flow velocity of ~51 cm/s calculated with an estimated Doppler angle of 80°.
The arrow indicated area was not unwrapped correctly due to the high shear rate near
the wall and Doppler shift noise, which can be observed in (g). The area between the
guide wire and the seam line could not be unwrapped properly due to the
discontinuity induced by the motion of the catheter and the guide wire. Therefore,
this region was not displayed in Fig.
5(h).In certain clinical settings, it may not be required to phase unwrap the Doppler
image, as the aliasing provides natural contour plot of the flow profile. Figure 6
demonstrates a video of simultaneous structural and Doppler OCT imaging of a
porcine carotid artery, where dilute (1.5%) blood in salineflush is injected with a
contrast injector pump at 5 ml/s (note: typical human carotid angiography uses 4 to
6 ml/s injection rate of contrast). Structural OCT NURD effects can be seen at the 6
to 7 o’clock sector. Seam lines can be seen at 11 to 2 o’clock sector
in the Doppler flow images. At the beginning of the video sequence, there is
homogenous filling of the vessel lumen by the blood in salineflush, while the
vessel wall is still visible. Despite the dilute nature of the flush (1.5% blood by
volume), Doppler shift induced by the intravascular flow is clearly visible with
associated aliasing rings, which shows the changes of flow waves with time due to
changes of flow rate (velocity) [22].
Visibility of the carotid artery wall is affected towards the end of the video
sequence, when the injection comes to an end and increased amount of blood starts to
fill in the lumen.
Fig. 6
(Media
2) Simultaneous structural (left)
and Doppler overlay (right) OCT video images
(Media
2) over 2 seconds during the late
phase of pump injection. Note the arterial pulsations in the structural
images and the aliasing rings of the flow profile in the Doppler image.
A seam line is moving through between the 11 o’clock and 2
o’clock positions, more apparent in the Doppler image than the
structural. Scale bar = 1 mm.
(Media
2) Simultaneous structural (left)
and Doppler overlay (right) OCT video images
(Media
2) over 2 seconds during the late
phase of pump injection. Note the arterial pulsations in the structural
images and the aliasing rings of the flow profile in the Doppler image.
A seam line is moving through between the 11 o’clock and 2
o’clock positions, more apparent in the Doppler image than the
structural. Scale bar = 1 mm.
4. Discussion and conclusion
While multiple different scanning protocols for phase resolved Doppler OCT flow
imaging in the Cartesian coordinate have been introduced in the recent years [23,24],
especially with the advance of increased A-scan rates available via high speed swept
wavelength lasers or line-scan cameras and galvoscanners, rotational catheter based
phase resolved Doppler OCT for intravascular flow is less developed. Frame to frame
phase shift calculation is not reliable with fiber rotational speed of 100 rps
during in vivo imaging. Therefore, line-to-line phase calculation
needs to be employed, yet 50 to 100 kHz A-scan rate limits the frame rate since
sufficient A-scan density is required for Doppler imaging. In this work, the imaging
was conducted at a frame rate of 20 frames/s with 2500 A-lines/frame, which is the
optimized condition for this particular endovascular OCT system. Theoretically the
denser the A lines the better Doppler signal can be detected. As the rotating speed
of the catheter is 20 rounds/s, the maximum A lines per frame is 2500 for the 50 KHz
endovascular OCT system. Thus the animal trials were conducted with 2500
A-lines/frame imaging. The laser, rotary mechanism of the catheter, and the
physiological characteristics being imaged, need to be considered simultaneously to
determine an optimized condition for a particular application.Currently the minimum detectable flow velocity determined by the noise floor of the
Doppler shift shown in Fig. 3(a) is ~2 mm/s,
assuming a Doppler angle of 70°. The maximum detectable velocity, when
multiple aliasing rings are visible, is affected by a combination of factors
including SNR, spatial resolution, and the performance of the phase unwrapping
techniques. In principle, phase unwrapping technique breaks down when the velocity
gradient equivalent to 2π occurs over a spatial dimension comparable to the
resolution of the OCT system [25]. In
practice, reduced SNR due to the low scattering flush fluid (1.5% blood in saline)
will further decrease the maximal detectable velocity. The finite element simulation
provided similar results with real-time intravascular imaging as shown in Fig. 5, demonstrating measurement of absolute
flow velocity at 51 cm/s.We note the simulation contains assumptions including non-deformable straight tube
with homogenous material properties, fluid density and viscosity of blood. These
depart from biological tissue with visco-elastic properties and responds to pressure
wave propagation from the arterial pulse. Many other factors, such as scatterer
concentration and tissue scattering parameters [26] affect the OCT signal and Doppler flow profile measurement. The main
source of error, however, arises from inability to precisely define the Doppler
angle in this work. Under in vivo conditions with catheter bending
within pulsating vessel, 10° angular error will not be an over estimation as
observed from real-time angiography. Therefore, future Doppler measurement accuracy
improvement can be obtained by conical rotational scanning.In comparison to IVUS based Doppler methods for intravascular flow imaging, Doppler
OCT provides better spatial and velocity resolution as both technique are subjected
to the same Doppler angle error, but optical wavelength is much shorter than IVUS
even when the latter operates at 100 MHz. OCT suffers from the need to optically
clear the blood while imaging, hence the pump injector may distort the intravascular
flow profile from physiological states. We note, however, during most catheter based
interventional procedures, the multiple devices inside the vessel (e.g., guide
catheter, imaging catheter, guide wires, etc.) would have already significantly
altered the flow profile. Directly imaging changes during different stages of
interventional treatment, such as those before and after angioplasty or stenting,
will provide insights to clinical applications, especially considering subtle
changes of the vessel in geometry can affect the flow field significantly [27].In conclusion, simultaneous structure OCT imaging and Doppler flow measurement in
porcine carotid artery was demonstrated, after investigating the required A-scan
density and NURD induced phase shift artifact. Using an endovascular OCT system with
custom-built data acquisition system and phase shift artifact removal algorithm,
minimal detectable velocity was characterized in a slow flow phantom. To our
knowledge, this is the first in vivo demonstration of Doppler
imaging and absolute measurement of intravascular flow using a rotating fiber
catheter in carotid artery.
Authors: Guillermo J Tearney; Evelyn Regar; Takashi Akasaka; Tom Adriaenssens; Peter Barlis; Hiram G Bezerra; Brett Bouma; Nico Bruining; Jin-man Cho; Saqib Chowdhary; Marco A Costa; Ranil de Silva; Jouke Dijkstra; Carlo Di Mario; Darius Dudek; Darius Dudeck; Erling Falk; Erlin Falk; Marc D Feldman; Peter Fitzgerald; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Hector Garcia; Nieves Gonzalo; Juan F Granada; Giulio Guagliumi; Niels R Holm; Yasuhiro Honda; Fumiaki Ikeno; Masanori Kawasaki; Janusz Kochman; Lukasz Koltowski; Takashi Kubo; Teruyoshi Kume; Hiroyuki Kyono; Cheung Chi Simon Lam; Guy Lamouche; David P Lee; Martin B Leon; Akiko Maehara; Olivia Manfrini; Gary S Mintz; Kyiouchi Mizuno; Marie-angéle Morel; Seemantini Nadkarni; Hiroyuki Okura; Hiromasa Otake; Arkadiusz Pietrasik; Francesco Prati; Lorenz Räber; Maria D Radu; Johannes Rieber; Maria Riga; Andrew Rollins; Mireille Rosenberg; Vasile Sirbu; Patrick W J C Serruys; Kenei Shimada; Toshiro Shinke; Junya Shite; Eliot Siegel; Shinjo Sonoda; Shinjo Sonada; Melissa Suter; Shigeho Takarada; Atsushi Tanaka; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Troels Thim; Thim Troels; Shiro Uemura; Giovanni J Ughi; Heleen M M van Beusekom; Antonius F W van der Steen; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Gerrit-Ann van Es; Gijs van Soest; Renu Virmani; Sergio Waxman; Neil J Weissman; Giora Weisz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Frank J H Gijsen; Jolanda J Wentzel; Attila Thury; Frits Mastik; Johannes A Schaar; Johan C H Schuurbiers; Cornelis J Slager; Wim J van der Giessen; Pim J de Feyter; Anton F W van der Steen; Patrick W Serruys Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2008-07-11 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Kyle H Y Cheng; Cuiru Sun; Juan P Cruz; Thomas R Marotta; Julian Spears; Walter J Montanera; Aman Thind; Brian Courtney; Beau A Standish; Victor X D Yang Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Alexey V Kamenskiy; Yuris A Dzenis; Jason N Mactaggart; Anastasia S Desyatova; Iraklis I Pipinos Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Kenneth K C Lee; Adrian Mariampillai; Joe X Z Yu; David W Cadotte; Brian C Wilson; Beau A Standish; Victor X D Yang Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Kyle H Y Cheng; Cuiru Sun; Barry Vuong; Kenneth K C Lee; Adrian Mariampillai; Thomas R Marotta; Julian Spears; Walter J Montanera; Peter R Herman; Tim-Rasmus Kiehl; Beau A Standish; Victor X D Yang Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Osman O Ahsen; Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Michael G Giacomelli; Zhao Wang; Kaicheng Liang; Tsung-Han Tsai; Benjamin Potsaid; Hiroshi Mashimo; James G Fujimoto Journal: Opt Lett Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 3.776
Authors: Tianshi Wang; Tom Pfeiffer; Evelyn Regar; Wolfgang Wieser; Heleen van Beusekom; Charles T Lancee; Geert Springeling; Ilona Krabbendam; Antonius F W van der Steen; Robert Huber; Gijs van Soest Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Nathan D Shemonski; Adeel Ahmad; Steven G Adie; Yuan-Zhi Liu; Fredrick A South; P Scott Carney; Stephen A Boppart Journal: Opt Express Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Yang Xu; Donald Darga; Jason Smid; Adam M Zysk; Daniel Teh; Stephen A Boppart; P Scott Carney Journal: Opt Lett Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 3.776
Authors: Barry Vuong; Helen Genis; Ronnie Wong; Joel Ramjist; Jamil Jivraj; Hamza Farooq; Cuiru Sun; Victor X D Yang Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 3.732