Literature DB >> 8898799

Carotid Doppler ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery stenosis based on residual lumen diameter calculated from en bloc carotid endarterectomy specimens.

N Suwanwela1, U Can, K L Furie, J F Southern, N R Macdonald, C S Ogilvy, C J Hansen, F S Buonanno, W M Abbott, W J Koroshetz, J P Kistler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Carotid duplex ultrasound is widely used to screen patients for carotid endarterectomy and if combined with MR angiography and transcranial Doppler may be an alternative to conventional angiography in the preoperative assessment. We have examined the correlation between Doppler velocities and the residual lumen diameters of internal carotid arteries from surgical pathological specimens to establish Doppler criteria for residual lumen diameter independent of percent stenosis.
METHODS: Ninety-one patients who underwent 99 carotid endarterectomies for internal carotid artery stenosis within 6 months of their carotid duplex ultrasound evaluation were studied. The endarterectomy specimens were removed en bloc, and the minimal residual lumen diameter was calculated by computer analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of the Doppler criteria for determining high-grade stenosis were calculated and receiver-operator curves generated.
RESULTS: Peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV),and carotid index (peak internal carotid artery velocity/ common carotid artery velocity) correlated with the residual lumen diameter. PSV > 440 cm/s, EDV > 155 cm/s, or carotid index > 10 indicated a residual lumen diameter of < or = 1.5 mm (specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 58%, 63%, and 30%, respectively). When these criteria were combined, the sensitivity increased to 72%. A PSV > 200 cm/s combined with either an EDV > 140 cm/s or a carotid index > 4.5 has a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 61%.
CONCLUSIONS: Doppler criteria can be both specific and sensitive for detecting a significant stenosis, defined as a < or = 1.5 mm residual lumen diameter. By adjustment of the velocity criteria, it can be 100% specific or a highly sensitive test (96%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8898799     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.27.11.1965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  6 in total

1.  Reappraisal of flow velocity ratio in common carotid artery to predict hemodynamic change in carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Masahiro Kamouchi; Kazuhiro Kishikawa; Yasushi Okada; Tooru Inoue; Setsuro Ibayashi; Mitsuo Iida
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Carotid endarterectomy: applying trial results in clinical practice.

Authors:  P M Walker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Carotid duplex ultrasound and transcranial Doppler findings in commercial divers and pilots.

Authors:  Banafshe Dormanesh; Kia Vosoughi; Fahimeh H Akhoundi; Masoud Mehrpour; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Setareh Esmaeili; Azin Shafiee Sabet
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Poststenotic flow and intracranial hemodynamics in patients with carotid stenosis: transoral carotid ultrasonography study.

Authors:  Masahiro Kamouchi; Kazuhiro Kishikawa; Yasushi Okada; Tooru Inoue; Setsuro Ibayashi; Mitsuo Iida
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Asymptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Origin Stenosis.

Authors:  Karen L. Furie; Mehmet Akif Topcuoglu; Peter J. Kelly; Walter J. Koroshetz; J. Philip Kistler
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001-10

6.  In vivo feasibility of endovascular Doppler optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Cuiru Sun; Felix Nolte; Kyle H Y Cheng; Barry Vuong; Kenneth K C Lee; Beau A Standish; Brian Courtney; Thomas R Marotta; Adrian Mariampillai; Victor X D Yang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.732

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.