Literature DB >> 23073714

The brain uses efference copy information to optimise spatial memory.

C C Gonzalez1, M R Burke.   

Abstract

Does a motor response to a target improve the subsequent recall of the target position or can we simply use peripheral position information to guide an accurate response? We suggest that a motor plan of the hand can be enhanced with actual motor and efference copy feedback (GoGo trials), which is absent in the passive observation of a stimulus (NoGo trials). To investigate this effect during eye and hand coordination movements, we presented stimuli in two formats (memory guided or visually guided) under three modality conditions (eyes only, hands only (with eyes fixated), or eyes and hand together). We found that during coordinated movements, both the eye and hand response times were facilitated when efference feedback of the movement was provided. Furthermore, both eye and hand movements to remembered locations were significantly more accurate in the GoGo than in the NoGo trial types. These results reveal that an efference copy of a motor plan enhances memory for a location that is not only observed in eye movements, but also translated downstream into a hand movement. These results have significant implications on how we plan, code and guide behavioural responses, and how we can optimise accuracy and timing to a given target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073714     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3298-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Ocular perturbations and retinal/extraretinal information: the coordination of saccadic and manual movements.

Authors:  G Binsted; D Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Duncker illusion and eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  J F Soechting; K C Engel; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effect of retinal and/or extra-retinal information on age in memory-guided saccades.

Authors:  M R Burke; J B Clarke; J Hedley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Self-moved target eye tracking in control and deafferented subjects: roles of arm motor command and proprioception in arm-eye coordination.

Authors:  J L Vercher; G M Gauthier; O Guédon; J Blouin; J Cole; Y Lamarre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Contribution of retinal versus extraretinal signals towards visual localization in goal-directed movements.

Authors:  O Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement.

Authors:  M A Goodale; D Pelisson; C Prablanc
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Apr 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions.

Authors:  H Bekkering; J J Adam; H Kingma; A Huson; H T Whiting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Combining eye and hand in search is suboptimal.

Authors:  Hanneke Liesker; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Gaze behavior when reaching to remembered targets.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Yasuo Terao; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Anticipatory eye movements evoked after active following versus passive observation of a predictable motion stimulus.

Authors:  M R Burke; G R Barnes
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  4 in total

1.  Multiple spatial representations interact to increase reach accuracy when coordinating a saccade with a reach.

Authors:  Yuriria Vazquez; Laura Federici; Bijan Pesaran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Differential effects of motor efference copies and proprioceptive information on response evaluation processes.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock; Edmund Wascher; Christian Beste
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Lateralization of spatial information processing in response monitoring.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-24

4.  Training of Working Memory Impacts Neural Processing of Vocal Pitch Regulation.

Authors:  Weifeng Li; Zhiqiang Guo; Jeffery A Jones; Xiyan Huang; Xi Chen; Peng Liu; Shaozhen Chen; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.