Literature DB >> 18632880

Gaze behavior when reaching to remembered targets.

J Randall Flanagan1, Yasuo Terao, Roland S Johansson.   

Abstract

People naturally direct their gaze to visible hand movement goals. Doing so improves reach accuracy through use of signals related to gaze position and visual feedback of the hand. Here, we studied where people naturally look when acting on remembered target locations. Four targets were presented on a screen, in peripheral vision, while participants fixed a central cross (encoding phase). Four seconds later, participants used a pen to mark the remembered locations while free to look wherever they wished (recall phase). Visual references, including the screen and the cross, were present throughout. During recall, participants neither looked at the marked locations nor prevented eye movements. Instead, gaze behavior was erratic and was comprised of gaze shifts loosely coupled in time and space with hand movements. To examine whether eye and hand movements during encoding affected gaze behavior during recall, in additional encoding conditions, participants marked the visible targets with either free gaze or with central cross fixation or just looked at the targets. All encoding conditions yielded similar erratic gaze behavior during recall. Furthermore, encoding mode did not influence recall performance, suggesting that participants, during recall, did not exploit sensorimotor memories related to hand and gaze movements during encoding. Finally, we recorded a similar lose coupling between hand and eye movements during an object manipulation task performed in darkness after participants had viewed the task environment. We conclude that acting on remembered versus visible targets can engage fundamentally different control strategies, with gaze largely decoupled from movement goals during memory-guided actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18632880     DOI: 10.1152/jn.90518.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  13 in total

1.  Brain activation related to combinations of gaze position, visual input, and goal-directed hand movements.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Min Wu; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  The role of observers' gaze behaviour when watching object manipulation tasks: predicting and evaluating the consequences of action.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Gerben Rotman; Andreas F Reichelt; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Kinematic synergies during saccades involving whole-body rotation: a study based on the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis.

Authors:  Adriana M Degani; Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos; Thomas Robert; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  The brain uses efference copy information to optimise spatial memory.

Authors:  C C Gonzalez; M R Burke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Gaze strategies during visually-guided versus memory-guided grasping.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Spatial and temporal eye-hand coordination relies on the parietal reach region.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Markus Hauschild; Melanie Wilke; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Delay of gaze fixation during reaching movement with the non-dominant hand to a distant target.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Shannon D R Ringenbach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Eye-hand coordination: memory-guided grasping during obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Hana H Abbas; Ryan W Langridge; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Task-Irrelevant Expectation Violations in Sequential Manual Actions: Evidence for a "Check-after-Surprise" Mode of Visual Attention and Eye-Hand Decoupling.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.