Literature DB >> 19590859

Combining eye and hand in search is suboptimal.

Hanneke Liesker1, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B J Smeets.   

Abstract

When performing everyday tasks, we often move our eyes and hand together: we look where we are reaching in order to better guide the hand. This coordinated pattern with the eye leading the hand is presumably optimal behaviour. But eyes and hands can move to different locations if they are involved in different tasks. To find out whether this leads to optimal performance, we studied the combination of visual and haptic search. We asked ten participants to perform a combined visual and haptic search for a target that was present in both modalities and compared their search times to those on visual only and haptic only search tasks. Without distractors, search times were faster for visual search than for haptic search. With many visual distractors, search times were longer for visual than for haptic search. For the combined search, performance was poorer than the optimal strategy whereby each modality searched a different part of the display. The results are consistent with several alternative accounts, for instance with vision and touch searching independently at the same time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590859      PMCID: PMC2721960          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1928-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Ocular gaze is anchored to the target of an ongoing pointing movement.

Authors:  S F Neggers; H Bekkering
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?

Authors:  M F Land; M Hayhoe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Eye-hand coupling during closed-loop drawing: evidence of shared motor planning?

Authors:  G Anthony Reina; Andrew B Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Coordinated control of eye and hand movements in dynamic reaching.

Authors:  S F W Neggers; H Bekkering
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Optimal transsaccadic integration explains distorted spatial perception.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; J Douglas Crawford; Douglas B Tweed
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration.

Authors:  M A Meredith; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Near optimal combination of sensory and motor uncertainty in time during a naturalistic perception-action task.

Authors:  A Aldo Faisal; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  3 in total

1.  The brain uses efference copy information to optimise spatial memory.

Authors:  C C Gonzalez; M R Burke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye-hand coupling is not the cause of manual return movements when searching.

Authors:  Hanneke Liesker; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Role of Gaze Cues in Interpersonal Motor Coordination: Towards Higher Affiliation in Human-Robot Interaction.

Authors:  Mahdi Khoramshahi; Ashwini Shukla; Stéphane Raffard; Benoît G Bardy; Aude Billard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.